X-Men: First Class movie

Started by srankmissingnin14 pages

Originally posted by -Pr-
there's no reason they can't be, imo.

he would certainly strengthen their position, though.

It's like making a JLA movie without Batman... only in the case of the X-Men don't have equivalents of Superman, GL, Flash or Wonder Woman to bringing fans without Batman inclusion. None of the X-Men outside of Wolverine have been able to sustain a solo book, and the few that have come close, well they aren't in this movie either...

The only upside is if it bombs, Disney might be able to buy back the rights.

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
It's like making a JLA movie without Batman... only in the case of the X-Men don't have equivalents of Superman, GL, Flash or Wonder Woman to bringing fans without Batman inclusion. None of the X-Men outside of Wolverine have been able to sustain a solo book, and the few that have come close, well they aren't in this movie either...

The only upside is if it bombs, Disney might be able to buy back the rights.

the x-men does have characters who are integral to the books other than wolverine, though. if you made a jla movie without batman, you'd still have people like superman and wonder woman. the x-men still has cyclops, storm, xavier, and a healthy rogues gallery. etc.

i honestly don't think the ability to sustain a solo book really matters when you're making an ensemble movie.

plus, who plays them also plays a part.

i hope disney does.

Originally posted by -Pr-
the x-men does have characters who are integral to the books other than wolverine, though. if you made a jla movie without batman, you'd still have people like superman and wonder woman. the x-men still has cyclops, storm, xavier, and a healthy rogues gallery. etc.

i honestly don't think the ability to sustain a solo book really matters when you're making an ensemble movie.

plus, who plays them also plays a part.

i hope disney does.

True, in the scheme of things most of the X-Men are far more integral to the team than Wolverine, he rarely plays an essential role in any of the X-Men stories, but there is a reason all the team books with Wolverine sell better than Legacy, and there is a reason Legacy sells more than X-Factor and New Mutants. Character fanbase is important.

That said more people buy vinyl records than comics, so in the scheme of things we are inconsequential to the success of a movie. Maybe the general public will love Havok and the movie will be a massive success... who can say.

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
True, in the scheme of things most of the X-Men are far more integral to the team than Wolverine, he rarely plays an essential role in any of the X-Men stories, but there is a reason all the team books with Wolverine sell better than Legacy, and there is a reason Legacy sells more than X-Factor and New Mutants. Character fanbase is important.

That said more people buy vinyl records than comics, so in the scheme of things we are inconsequential to the success of a movie. Maybe the general public will love Havok and the movie will be a massive success... who can say.

I'm not arguing that the fanbase isn't important. I'd agree that an X-Men movie with Wolverine will always make more money than one without. All I was saying was that without him, one could potentially still turn a decent profit based on it's own merits.

Let's hope they don't, and they eventually reboot X-Men in a few years. Well, I do at least.

I'm very pissed at this movie. And it seems to contradict the other 4 X-Men films. Emma Stone appeared in X-Men Origins: Wolverine so I don't know how she can appear in this film that is supposed to be "canon" since it will take place in the 60's. I don't have high expectations for this film.

This guy's video did a great job on explaining why I'm not excited for this movie.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qebt-LyTYxY

You mean Emma Frost?

Originally posted by -Pr-
You mean Emma Frost?

CRAP! I can't believe I said that 😆 . Yeah, I meant Emma Frost XD.

Really Emma frost is in it? That's the one that changed to diamonds right?

Bingo

Maybe it will suck so bad that we can forget about it so we won't have to worry about it fitting into the other movies.

The trailer for this will debut tomorrow .

Oh, god. Don't think I'm ready, man.

Originally posted by Kazenji
The trailer for this will debut tomorrow .

Fox have already crushed my hopes for a good origin movie.
The era helps but the roster doesn't.

Originally posted by Kazenji
The trailer for this will debut tomorrow .

and here it is! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfZ5ZJPdG7k

Originally posted by Darth Venom
and here it is! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfZ5ZJPdG7k

Holy ****. I was not expect this at all... but that trailer look absolutely awesome. Better than Thor. Better than Cap. Better than Green Lantern. I just went from low expectations to can't wait. 😱

Here's the trailer embedded.

YouTube video

Why did FOX waste some many Superbowl spots with crappy House commericals when they had this?

I had no expectations. So I am very pleased.

really looks good hope it will do well

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
Holy ****. I was not expect this at all... but that trailer look absolutely awesome. Better than Thor. Better than Cap. Better than Green Lantern. I just went from low expectations to can't wait. 😱

Here's the trailer embedded.

YouTube video

Why did FOX waste some many Superbowl spots with crappy House commericals when they had this?

would beast be beast in this and not a man ?

Beast is the kid with the glasses.

That actually looks pretty good.
But I'm curious as to how Emma frost is in it when she was in wolverine and younger? Does she not age?