Which is more durable?

Started by Colossus-Big C3 pages

Which is more durable?

cables arm
colossus body
omega reds tenticles
iron mans armor
cyborg supermans cyborg parts
supermans eye ball

colossus body...duh

omega reds testicles

it had to be done

Superman's eyeball.

Originally posted by Galan007
Superman's eyeball.
its not more durable than colossus body, which adamantium can't even cut

Originally posted by Starscream M
its not more durable than colossus body
Proof!? sneer

Originally posted by Galan007
Proof!? sneer
admantium can't cut colossus, Im sure it can scratch supermans eyeballs

or put it this way, do you think superman would shrug off attacks that colossus' body can withstand directly to his eyes?

Originally posted by Starscream M
its not more durable than colossus body, which adamantium can't even cut

it can cut, given the right amount of force

Originally posted by Starscream M
admantium can't cut colossus, Im sure it can scratch supermans eyeballs
Proof!? You ever seen anything scratch Superman's eye?

Me either. sneer

Originally posted by Starscream M
its not more durable than colossus body, which adamantium can't even cut

Incorrect. Adamantium can cut his skin if it had enough force behind it.

Originally posted by Galan007
Proof!? You ever seen anything scratch Superman's eye?

Me either. sneer

we have to assume that superman's eye, however durable it may be, is not as durable as the rest of his body...which HAS been scratched by objects considerably less sharp or unbreakable than adamantium

Re: Which is more durable?

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
cyborg supermans cyborg parts
brilliant

If Wolverine slashed Supermans face, and a claw caught his eye, you honestly think it won't hurt him?

Originally posted by KingD19
If Wolverine slashed Supermans face, and a claw caught his eye, you honestly think it won't hurt him?

No, I don't. However i think either side would be hard pressed to prove this.

Originally posted by Lunacyde
No, I don't. However i think either side would be hard pressed to prove this.
Prove it then

Originally posted by Starscream M
we have to assume that superman's eye, however durable it may be, is not as durable as the rest of his body...
Why?

the human eye containes no muscles bones or organs ,-It logically should be less durable than your body

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
the human eye containes no muscles bones or organs ,-It logically should be less durable than your body
Logically a good comic does not make.

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
the human eye containes no muscles bones or organs ,-It logically should be less durable than your body

But Superman > Colossus so it follows that Superman's eye would be > Colossus's body 😖hifty:

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
the human eye containes no muscles bones or organs ,-It logically should be less durable than your body
The human eye is an organ and does contain some muscular tissue.

What relevance does that have to Superman?