Which is more durable?

Started by Blanket3 pages
Blanket Dead

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
The human eye is an organ and does contain some muscular tissue.

What relevance does that have to Superman?

Plus, how would having organs in it make it more durable?

Black bolt z Mindsets Master

Originally posted by Blanket
Plus, how would having organs in it make it more durable?
More tissue to cut through.This is a case of comic logic vs. RL logic.

xmarksthespot CEO, BS Comics

Originally posted by Black bolt z
More tissue to cut through.This is a case of comic logic vs. RL logic.
The idea in physiology is generally to protect organs with skin and the musculoskeletal system... rather than use them as a shield for other organs... ermm

Colossus-Big C Restricted

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
The idea in physiology is generally to protect organs with skin and the musculoskeletal system... rather than use them as a shield for other organs... ermm
Whoops, someone just made up a word 😗

Blanket Dead

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
Whoops, someone just made up a word 😗
There's a searchbar at the top of your browser I suspect. Use it on words before you make an ass of yourself.

Lunacyde Lord of Logic
Originally posted by Blanket
Prove it then

I just said anyone would be hard pressed to actually prove it either way.

I am only talking logically speaking it would take more force than Wolverine can produce to hurt Superman....even if it's his eye.

Blanket Dead

Originally posted by Lunacyde
I just said anyone would be hard pressed to actually prove it either way.

I am only talking logically speaking it would take more force than Wolverine can produce to hurt Superman....even if it's his eye.

So why bring up 'proof', if we're allowed to just insert our opinions into the mix?

Galan007 |Quantum Observer|

^ Cuz it's fun. Duh. uhuh

Lunacyde Lord of Logic
Originally posted by Blanket
So why bring up 'proof', if we're allowed to just insert our opinions into the mix?

Well normally I would say proof is necessary, but in this special situation I don't think there is any proof, so all we can depend on is logic.

galactusischere Apocalypse..begins!

Colossus.

Omega Vision Face Flowed Into Her Eyes

Cyborg Superman with Apokoliptian Metal would be > Colossus most likely.

Blanket Dead

Originally posted by Lunacyde
Well normally I would say proof is necessary, but in this special situation I don't think there is any proof, so all we can depend on is logic.
Right. Make up the rules as we go, I see.

cdtm Restricted
Originally posted by KingD19
If Wolverine slashed Supermans face, and a claw caught his eye, you honestly think it won't hurt him?

Why would it?

It's not just about the tool, it's about the force put behind it..

Or put another way, you honestly don't think Colossus would be bothered by a thumb to the eye from Wonder Woman, as Superman was?

Colossus-Big C Restricted

Originally posted by cdtm
Why would it?

It's not just about the tool, it's about the force put behind it..

Or put another way, you honestly don't think Colossus would be bothered by a thumb to the eye from Wonder Woman, as Superman was?

physical resistance and piercing resistant is not the same.

a diamond is incredibly hard to cut but can be smashed easily

cdtm Restricted

Anyways, no Hulks Pants?

KingD19 Shai-Gen's Enigmatic Wong

Originally posted by cdtm
Why would it?

It's not just about the tool, it's about the force put behind it..

Or put another way, you honestly don't think Colossus would be bothered by a thumb to the eye from Wonder Woman, as Superman was?

Well if you want to argue semantics, Kryptonians are essentially human(with a few unknown purpose organs), who gain powers in yellow sunlight. Despite Supes durability, his eyes are still much weaker than his skin/bones/muscles.

Colossus on the other hand is organic metal throughout, his eyes included, so maybe he would be as bothered, maybe he wouldn't.

But to say that a slash, stab to the eye wouldn't damage him at all is just....ughh.

Let's not forget, bone claw Wolverine sliced Thanos 🙂 (Waits for Quanchi to magically appear)

Blanket Dead

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
a diamond is incredibly hard to cut but can be smashed easily
that doesn't sound right...

Starscream M Senior Member

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
The human eye is an organ and does contain some muscular tissue.

What relevance does that have to Superman?

superman's physiology is similar to humans...although on a whole other level

hence his bones >>> his skin >>> his eyes

cdtm Restricted
Originally posted by Blanket
So why bring up 'proof', if we're allowed to just insert our opinions into the mix?

True enough.

Basically, as there isn't any way to prove whether Superman can take a Wolverine claw to the eye (DC's closest equivilant metal is only comparable to secondary Adamantium..) this debate hinges on proving that Supermans eye is significantly less durable than not only his body, but than characters Wolverine has failed to cut before.

We ARE in agreement that he can tank a Wolvie claw to the body, right?

KingD19 Shai-Gen's Enigmatic Wong

Originally posted by Starscream M
superman's physiology is similar to humans...although on a whole other level

hence his bones >>> his skin >>> his eyes

You know it's not Superman himself that's durable, it's that skin-tight energy field that allows him to fly through space unaided, and pick up huge objects without them crumbling under their own weight.

And yeah CD, we all know he can tank one to the body.