The One-Above-All versus The Fulcrum

Started by Omega Vision2 pages
Omega Vision Face Flowed Into Her Eyes

Originally posted by Tannz0rz
Hrm, if that's true, then what if they are in fact the same entity just under different names?

Because Jack Kirby can be as many people as he wants.

Tannz0rz Junior Member
Originally posted by Omega Vision
Because Jack Kirby can be as many people as he wants.

Wait what? Re-read my question. 😉

Omega Vision Face Flowed Into Her Eyes

Originally posted by Tannz0rz
Wait what? Re-read my question. 😉

Well I still stand by my statement that Jack Kirby can be as many different people as he wants.

See there's Jack Kirby and then there's Jack Kirby. Which are both different from Jack Kirby.

guy222 With my gal

The Fulcrum

Tannz0rz Junior Member

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Well I still stand by my statement that Jack Kirby can be as many different people as he wants.

See there's Jack Kirby and then there's Jack Kirby. Which are both different from Jack Kirby.

My point of that post was that your answer seemed to not be relevant to my question.
I repeat: "what if they are in fact the same entity just under different names?"

Ah, and guy, glad to see someone take the side of the Fulcrum.

Omega Vision Face Flowed Into Her Eyes

Originally posted by Tannz0rz
My point of that post was that your answer seemed to not be relevant to my question.
I repeat: "what if they are in fact the same entity just under different names?"

Ah, and guy, glad to see someone take the side of the Fulcrum.


I have no problem with that interpretation.

But then I also think that the TOAA and the Presence are the same being. 😉

Tannz0rz Junior Member

Originally posted by Omega Vision
I have no problem with that interpretation.

But then I also think that the TOAA and the Presence are the same being. 😉

Ah, then I suppose that was a misinterpretation on my part.

guy222 With my gal

Originally posted by Tannz0rz
My point of that post was that your answer seemed to not be relevant to my question.
I repeat: "what if they are in fact the same entity just under different names?"

Ah, and guy, glad to see someone take the side of the Fulcrum.

🙂

The story the Brothers wrote, I liked it

Endless Mike Sqirrel Girl fanboy

TOAA, unless the Fulcrum actually is TOAA

Omega Vision Face Flowed Into Her Eyes

Originally posted by Endless Mike
TOAA, unless the Fulcrum actually is TOAA

Either way Jack Kirby wins.

Falamu Senior Member

Um, just wondering, in response to the first post, when did Marvel ever say that the One-Above-All not being God really "wasn't the case"? Because I never heard that before. The One-Above-All entity in Marvel is enigmatic, perhaps, but, yes, I think the basic concept for it was that it serving as the supreme Creator of the Marvel Multiverse.