Originally posted by Nephthys
They didn't change philosophically at all however. All that happened was that they stopped using armor and being so militarily focused because the Senate was worried about more war. After Redemption, the Jedi Order does a complete 180 and turn into their PT versions without explanation. I agree with Janus that this is a continuity issue.
Ok so you subscribe to the idea that if you don't get an explanation on something, it must be a continuity issue. Gotcha
I was merely correcting you. However, you cannot disagree that in the comic the Kotor-Jedi's issues to do with non-attachment are completely absent. Nomi was married and had a child, forming a romantic relationship with Ulic right in front of her fellow Jedi Knights. Sylvar and Crado were life-long mates, again, right in front of other jedi, as well as Vodo. Odan Urr's code was widely confusing and had many differing interpretations. It does not speak against emotion, nor does it speak against attachment, as we see both were allowed in the Great War era. [/B]
Not mentioning attachment and forbidding it are two different things. It doesn't have to be mentioned at all, I'm not sure what's so hard to understand about this. Now if it mentioned it then you would have a point. But not taking a stance on something and later taking a stance on something isn't a continuity issue. Taking a stance on something and going back on it later may be, which is still debatable.
