Originally posted by Turr_Phennir
There's plenty. There's next to nothing concrete about his personality, traits, flaws, i.e. the essential components that endears a character to a person. Revan is an idea, a template, a blank canvas that has yet to receive color.
I thought Revan's personality was quite obvious, despite what limited character control we had in the first game. It's clear he's a lifelong learner, he's a prodigy in the classroom (with which I can strongly identify), he was charismatic and idealistic, a strong combination in a time of strife and war. He has a sense of humor, as shown by his endearment of HK's personality, and he was for all intents and purposes an energetic leader, constantly looking for new ways to defeat his foes (first the Mandos, then the Sith).
The rest we can infer from the dialogue choices. Drew K, who's writing Revan's personality in the novel, wrote the dialogue for the first game. Some of the dialogue choices, especially those with a wry sense of humor, can be attributed to Drew's interpretation of the character he's essentially creating.
One isn't likely to be enamored with a lump of clay and mistake it for a fully defined statue.
Sorry, I almost thought this was a Sidious reference.
The idea of Revan is intriguing and I'm looking forward to the novel for just that reason, but I find the idea of being a Revan fanboy to be as silly as it is impossible, and the product of deep-seated narcissism. (This applies for most BioWare protagonists.)
When I skimmed previously and saw deep-seated narcissism, I immediately thought you were all talking of me. What does that say?