Anne Rice's "Vampire Chronicles" versus the "Twilight" Vampires

Started by Rogue Jedi13 pages

Originally posted by dadudemon
Dude, 30 days of night?

😆

Really?

Lost boys? Really?

Angel?

Really?

😆

You make it seem as thought there's any logical comparison.

When selene goes into vamp. mode, her eyes get lighter and they glow.

When all the other vampire (cept in Bloodrayne) go vampire, they turn into ugly ass monsters.

Yup, it's a vampire trait shared by all those franchises, fact. Underworld vampires do not share this trait.

Rayne is only half vampire, she doesn't go full monster vamp. Obviously the ridged brow is one of the traits she inherited.

pure speculation

Pure speculation? It's in the movies/shows, dude. Nothing to speculate, it's fact.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Pure speculation? It's in the movies/shows, dude. Nothing to speculate, it's fact.

Pure speculation.

It's never said.

And when she starts to rage, it never changes.

It's just something you made up to justify her man-brow.

313

Originally posted by dadudemon
Pure speculation.

It's never said.

And when she starts to rage, it never changes.

It's just something you made up to justify her man-brow.

313

Nah. In Angel, when he is in human form, he's all Twilight looking, and when he goes vamp, BOOM, out comes the ridge.

Same with the Lost Boys.

In 30 Days of Night, the humans look human, the Vampires have the extended brow.

Facts. 😄 Not that it really matters, if I had her dhampir bewbz in my face I'd agree with anything you say.

Well, Buffyverse vampires, have a bumpy forehead in vampire mode, so yeah. However True Blood Vampires for example do not. I don't know about Bloodrayne, I only played part of the first game and you mostly see her from the back and it didn't come up in the part I played.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, Buffyverse vampires, have a bumpy forehead in vampire mode, so yeah. However True Blood Vampires for example do not. I don't know about Bloodrayne, I only played part of the first game and you mostly see her from the back and it didn't come up in the part I played.
Mhm, their foreheads are "elongated", or whatever you wanna call it. Just remembered that the Van Helsing vampires have this too.

Rice vamps don't have this. Nor do the Twitwinkies.

Bloodrayne just happens to have it.

wuuuuuuuuuuuuuut

Actually, the see-through shirt is kinda gay as well.

wuuuuuuuuuutt

i admit it is kinda hard to tell the difference between them with those pics.. besides lestat is bi..

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
i admit it is kinda hard to tell the difference between them with those pics.. besides lestat is bi..

Almost every Ricevamp has bisexual, if not, homosexual tendencies.

Originally posted by Slay
Almost every Ricevamp has bisexual, if not, homosexual tendencies.
No.

Ricevamps sexual rogans are non functional. They learn, as Vampires, to love their companion, male or female, on a level that humans cannot possibly comprehend. The way she writes it, it implies that it it better than sex.

They are not Bi, they just love each other passionately.

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
i admit it is kinda hard to tell the difference between them with those pics.. besides lestat is bi..

He's closer to 90% gay, 10% straight. 😐

Don't try and white-wash it.

Edward?

100% straight.

😐

People can call the twivamps f*gs, but they aren't gay. 😐

i dont remember ever reading the vamps sex organs not working... if i recall in blood and gold marius and armand had sex with some roman chick and was no mention of their organs not working..

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
No.

Ricevamps sexual rogans are non functional. They learn, as Vampires, to love their companion, male or female, on a level that humans cannot possibly comprehend. The way she writes it, it implies that it it better than sex.

They are not Bi, they just love each other passionately.


Dude, stop trying to make Ricevamps look like John Rambo. They're bi, or gay. If you read The Vampire Armand there'd be no doubt in your mind. That's one of Rice's favourite subjects, you'll even find it in her Sleeping Beauty series. Anyway, the Ricevamps are better because they're beautifully complex creatures, not because of how strong their pyrokinesis or whatever is.

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
i dont remember ever reading the vamps sex organs not working... if i recall in blood and gold marius and armand had sex with some roman chick and was no mention of their organs not working..

Doesn't even really matter whether their sexual organs are in function. It's made clear numerous of times through the entire series that a few male vampires cherish a sexual desire for one another.

this really puts things in perspective.. gonna have to ponder things a bit

Originally posted by Slay
Dude, stop trying to make Ricevamps look like John Rambo. They're bi, or gay. If you read The Vampire Armand there'd be no doubt in your mind. That's one of Rice's favourite subjects, you'll even find it in her Sleeping Beauty series. Anyway, the Ricevamps are better because they're beautifully complex creatures, not because of how strong their pyrokinesis or whatever is.
That's actually the one that I have not read.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
That's actually the one that I have not read.

I've only read 4 of them:

Interview with the Vampire.
The Vampire Lestat.
The Queen of the Damned.
The Tale of the Body Thief.

I read them in that order...as a kid, more or less. I read them over a boring summer break.

I might read others, but I'm more intereseted in reading about D from Vampire Hunter D. Apparantly, it is a really good vampire series and some say it is better than Anne Rice's works.

I have watched the movie and the animation was just astounding: some of the best I've ever seen. Each still frame is almost like a painting (anime).

The "back-story" is much more interesting than the "The Vampire Chronicles."