Mr. Sinister vs Emma Frost

Started by chomperx918 pages

Originally posted by iceman24567
I just explained how he loses does a mod have to come in here and explain it for me so you understand? Where the hell is Pr
i gave my opinion on how he loses to. usually people who agree on who wins they back one another up. even if i agree with you or disagree u gotta find some way to get on my back cause afew others join in.

how about question the people who dont think emma would win since you think sinister loses.

Originally posted by Mindset
your forgivin

Originally posted by chomperx9
fixed
Incorrect. I see you haven't studied what logic is.

The argument from silence (also called argumentum ex silentio in Latin) is generally a conclusion based on silence or lack of contrary evidence. In the field of classical studies, it often refers to the deduction from the lack of references to a subject in the available writings of an author to the conclusion that he was ignorant of it. When used as a logical proof in pure reasoning, the argument is classed among the fallacies, but an argument from silence can be a convincing form of abductive reasoning.

Just because the other person doesn't answer doesn't mean they don't know.

Like we went over before, If I asked you about your password, your not answering would not mean that you didn't know what your password is.

Originally posted by Creshosk
If you're on the same side then why are you arguing with them?
check again who started questioning who

chomper:

experience != skill

experience != power

Sinister can be more experienced than Emma and still lose.

Originally posted by chomperx9
i gave my opinion on how he loses to. usually people who agree on who wins they back one another up. even if i agree with you or disagree u gotta find some way to get on my back cause afew others join in.

how about question the people who dont think emma would win since you think sinister loses.

I have no problem with those people because it's hardly a one sided match it could go i either way but I think Emma wins. I'm jumping on your back (lol) because the shit you spew is inaccurate to say the least.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Incorrect. I see you haven't studied what logic is.

The argument from silence (also called argumentum ex silentio in Latin) is generally a conclusion based on silence or lack of contrary evidence. In the field of classical studies, it often refers to the deduction from the lack of references to a subject in the available writings of an author to the conclusion that he was ignorant of it. When used as a logical proof in pure reasoning, the argument is classed among the fallacies, but an argument from silence can be a convincing form of abductive reasoning.

Just because the other person doesn't answer doesn't mean they don't know.

Like we went over before, If I asked you about your password, your not answering would not mean that you didn't know what your password is.

personal info has nothing to do with showing proof when making a point. how come i have to explain myself but nobody else does ?

Just because the other person doesn't answer doesn't mean they don't know.

ask your parents this. who is more likely to know the answer to something ? someone who answers a question or somene who ignores it.

Originally posted by chomperx9
i gave my opinion on how he loses to. usually people who agree on who wins they back one another up. even if i agree with you or disagree u gotta find some way to get on my back cause afew others join in.

how about question the people who dont think emma would win since you think sinister loses.

Because you're wrong about something.

If I were to make a thread about Wolverine vs 1 hand ninja and another pwerson were to say that wolverine wins and adds in that he could beat Galactus. That doesn't mean they're wrong about wolverine winning against the hand ninja just because they're wrong about wolverine beating galactus. And someone pointing out that Wolverine could not beat galactus does not mean that they think that the hand ninja could beat wolverine.

Emma does NOT have more experience. But she would beat sinister.

Originally posted by iceman24567
I have no problem with those people because it's hardly a one sided match it could go i either way but I think Emma wins. I'm jumping on your back (lol) because the shit you spew is inaccurate to say the least.
you started jumping on me over the more experience part when im agreeing with you on who wins.

wouldnt it make more sense to question the people who think she loses ?

Originally posted by chomperx9
check again who started questioning who
reported for trolling

Originally posted by Mindset
chomper:

experience != skill

experience != power

Sinister can be more experienced than Emma and still lose.

👆 you even got Mindset "debating"

Originally posted by chomperx9
you started jumping on me over the more experience part when im agreeing with you on who wins.

wouldnt it make more sense to question the people who think she loses ?

No it doesn't because like i said it's debatable who wins but it isn't debatable who is more experienced you better stop before a mod does come in here slick

Originally posted by Creshosk
Because you're wrong about something.

If I were to make a thread about Wolverine vs 1 hand ninja and another pwerson were to say that wolverine wins and adds in that he could beat Galactus. That doesn't mean they're wrong about wolverine winning against the hand ninja just because they're wrong about wolverine beating galactus. And someone pointing out that Wolverine could not beat galactus does not mean that they think that the hand ninja could beat wolverine.

Emma does NOT have more experience. But she would beat sinister.

i said emma has more eperience i no where said she can beat galactus and sinister cant. your comparrisons are horrible.

even if i make a point to you. you still gotta turn it around. or depends who is on

i can have an argument with ice-man about me saying wolverine loses to galacuts and him saying wolverine wins. you would bump in saying oh wolverine has an adamantium skeleton he cant lose.

Originally posted by chomperx9
personal info has nothing to do with showing proof when making a point. how come i have to explain myself but nobody else does ?
But its the same thing. If I were to ask you for a password and you didn't answer I couldn't accuse you of not knowing. even though its still a question.

They're both questions. Its an analogy to better show how you're commiting the argument from silence fallacy.

Originally posted by iceman24567
No it doesn't because like i said it's debatable who wins but it isn't debatable who is more experienced you better stop before a mod does come in here slick
you and your homies need to get off my back. anything i say you gotta find some way to turn it around no matter the subject. i dont know what the hell i did to you sorry but have no clue why you and the others are on my ass 24/7

and if you dont mind responding can you tell me how come you dont question the people who think emma would lose since you think she wins.

Originally posted by chomperx9
i said emma has more eperience i no where said she can beat galactus and sinister cant. your comparrisons are horrible.
You only think they're horrible because you don't understand. Emma does NOT have more experience.

Originally posted by chomperx9
[Beven if i make a point to you. you still gotta turn it around. or depends who is on[/b]
We won't know that until you make a point.

Originally posted by chomperx9
[Bi can have an argument with ice-man about me saying wolverine loses to galacuts and him saying wolverine wins. you would bump in saying oh wolverine has an adamantium skeleton he cant lose. [/B]
Strawmanning. Don't put words into my mouth.

I was trying to use obvious analogies you'd be able to understand. Looks like you can't even understand simple analogies.

Originally posted by Creshosk
But its the same thing. If I were to ask you for a password and you didn't answer I couldn't accuse you of not knowing. even though its still a question.

They're both questions. Its an analogy to better show how you're commiting the argument from silence fallacy.

there are different types of questions this part of the forum isnt about password sharing. its about comic fights.

again horrible comparrison

Originally posted by chomperx9
you and your homies need to get off my back. anything i say you gotta find some way to turn it around no matter the subject. i dont know what the hell i did to you sorry but have no clue why you and the others are on my ass 24/7

and if you dont mind responding can you tell me how come you dont question the people who think emma would lose since you think she wins.

The fact that i answered your question in the very post you quoted me on proves you are trolling 😬

Originally posted by iceman24567
I thought their was an age limit for this very reason?
Apparently he got his parents permission because the age limit is 13. And i fhe really is 12 then he's below the age limit.

Originally posted by chomperx9
there are different types of questions this part of the forum isnt about password sharing. its about comic fights.

again horrible comparrison

Oh I'm sorry, I thought that a question was a question. I guess its not a question it must be a supposition then right?

"What's your password?" is not a question then.