French parliament approves face veil ban

But who would want a race war in the first place?
I'd would be very happy with British Asians at 25% of the UK's population and at least 40% of the UK's major cities (London, Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool, Cardiff, Glasgow, Edinburgh, Bradford, Newcastle, Leeds & Bristol)

And the same thing can be said for Canada as well, Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, Quebec City, Ottawa, Calgary, Edmonton all have large South Asian populations and it would be eaiser to expand because White Canadians are a lot more tolerant than White British people.

BROWN PRIDE!

Originally posted by majid86
But who would want a race war in the first place?
I'd would be very happy with British Asians at 25% of the UK's population and at least 40% of the UK's major cities (London, Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool, Cardiff, Glasgow, Edinburgh, Bradford, Newcastle, Leeds & Bristol)

Okay, now the blacks and east asians want the same thing. Do some math and see how that works out in the cities.

Originally posted by majid86
But who would want a race war in the first place?
I'd would be very happy with British Asians at 25% of the UK's population and at least 40% of the UK's major cities (London, Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool, Cardiff, Glasgow, Edinburgh, Bradford, Newcastle, Leeds & Bristol)

it was you i was quoting when i brought it up

you also seem to go out of your way to divide the world into racial groups in your thinking

Originally posted by inimalist
America is the only nation on the planet with some form of ICBM defense shield.

Originally posted by inimalist
it was you i was quoting when i brought it up

you also seem to go out of your way to divide the world into racial groups in your thinking

Nah man, you got it all wrong, im NOT a racist and NOT a jihadist either, i just what to see my people prosper in the majority english speaking nations that they live in (USA, Canada, Britain, South Africa, Australia, New Zealand)

And there is nothing wrong with that and white people should accept it because they would benefit as well from it.

Originally posted by Parmaniac
Is it save to fire nukes out off the air with these things? I'm really not sure most likely the nuke will just get destroyed but isn't there at least a little doubt left in the minds of experts about firing at nukes?

No. It's impossible to accidentally set off a nuclear weapon by shooting it.

Originally posted by majid86
Nah man, you got it all wrong, im NOT a racist and NOT a jihadist either, i just what to see my people prosper in the majority english speaking nations that they live in (USA, Canada, Britain, South Africa, Australia, New Zealand)

And there nothing wrong with that and white people should accept it because they would benefit as well from it.

Your People? That sounds like something a KKK member would say. 😐

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
No. It's impossible to accidentally set off a nuclear weapon by shooting it.

unless you are shooting it with neutrons

Originally posted by majid86
Nah man, you got it all wrong, im NOT a racist and NOT a jihadist either, i just what to see my people prosper in the majority english speaking nations that they live in (USA, Canada, Britain, South Africa, Australia, New Zealand)

And there is nothing wrong with that and white people should accept it because they would benefit as well from it.

for someone who isn't a racist, racial issues seem really important to you

Originally posted by inimalist
unless you are shooting it with neutrons

Maybe, I think modern nukes are subcritical before being set off. The "gun" system as it was described to me.

this is reply intended for majid
i didnt want to say it.. b/c i didnt want to be considered racist by pointing out the obvious.. 😬 but, yeh.

in my mind everyone will have a beautiful tan look. i call it milky cinnamoni . with light brown colored hair with high lights and variation of eye color..

that will be the next lvl of racism: eye color..

i had to repost b/c i screwed up.. i was falling asleep.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Maybe, I think modern nukes are subcritical before being set off. The "gun" system as it was described to me.

fair enough

im reading through a history of nucelar science, and im only at the neurton bombardment part.

Originally posted by King Castle
this is reply intended for majid
i didnt want to say it.. b/c i didnt want to be considered racist by pointing out the obvious.. 😬 but, yeh.

in my mind everyone will have a beautiful tan look. i call it milky cinnamoni . with light brown colored hair with high lights and variation of eye color..

that will be the next lvl of racism: eye color..

i had to repost b/c i screwed up.. i was falling asleep.

I kind of agree with you on that but eye colour racism is even more pointless than racism itself.
And i already naturally have brown skin, jet black hair and brown eyes so i dont have to worry about getting a tan, dying my hair & getting eye contacts.
Im a naturally 5 foot 11 inches 240 lbs exotic guy all the way and proud of it.

Originally posted by inimalist
they might have numbers, but they would be outclassed militarily and economically. If Europe/Russia/America wanted to, they could make East and South Asia vassal states. It would be a killing field, but the mixture of sanctions and military supremency could make the nations these races belong to very weak.

Really? In terms of nuclear power you might have a point, but economically? Japan, China, India, Latin America, the asian tigers and the middle eastern nations toghether could destroy the USA (considering it a white nation as you did), Russian and European economies even worst than the opposite. And besides, who would follow sanctions against all nations on the planet except for usa and europe? They would be the ones isolated and screwed. So, no vassal states, the chinese by themselves could run the USA's economy into the ground as it is today.

As far as conventional warfare is concerned, USA, Russia and Europe would be defeated as well. Only through Nuclear war would they be able to 'win' and they'd lose hundreds of millions and be left to deal with radiation poisioning for centuries to pull that off. A lot of these 'non-white' countries have second strike capabilties. You put too much faith on anti-ICBM shields.

you are far overstating the grain of truth you have there...

it is certainly not meaningless when looked at from a psychological viewpoint. Race has played a huge part not only in human society, but in human evolution and cognition

Different races never emerged throughout human evolution, human intracladistic diversity is clinal. Therefore the concept of race, which is a taxonomic categorization, is meaningless to humans from an evolutionary point of view. This is the dominant perception among both biologists and anthropologists concerned with human evolution.

Race as is used in common speech is an artifical incoherent concept whose meaning does not reflect objective reality. The delimitations of a race are arbitrary and determined by whoever uses the term. They can be anything from skin color to religion. The fact that it may have psychological relevance to people who see the world or are seen through racialist lenses has nothing to do with what I was saying about biological races.

Significant hereditary cognitive differences among different 'races'? Is that what you're getting at? I'm extremelly skeptical and yes, I have read Lynn's work.

Originally posted by 753
Really? In terms of nuclear power you might have a point, but economically? Japan, China, India, Latin America, the asian tigers and the middle eastern nations toghether could destroy the USA (assuming it is a white nation as you did) and European economies even worst than the opposite, if it came to that. And besides, who would follow sanctions against all nations on the planet except for usa and europe? They would be the ones isolated and screwed. So, no vassal states, the chinese by themselves could run the USA's economy into the ground.

As far as conventional warfare is concerned, USA, Russia and Europe would be defeated as well. Only through Nuclear war would they be able to 'win' and they'd lose hundreds of millions and be left to deal with radiation poisioning for centuries to pull that off. A lot of these 'non-white' countries have second strike capabilties. You put too much faith on anti-ICBM shields.

lol, fair enough

Originally posted by 753
Different races never emerged throughout human evolution, human intracladistic diversity is clinal. Therefore the concept of race, which is a biological taxonomic categorization, is meaningless to humans from an evolutionary point of view. This is the dominant perception among both biologists and anthropologists concerned with human evolution.

Race as is used in common speech is an artifical incoherent concept whose meaning does not reflect objective reality. The delimitations of a race are arbitrary and determined by whoever uses the term. They can be anything from skin color to religion. The fact that it may have psychological relevance to people who see the world or are seen through racialist lenses has nothing to do with what I was saying about biological races.

Significant hereditary cognitive differences among different 'races'? Is that what you're getting at? I'm extremelly skeptical and yes, I have read Lynn's work.

lol

are you familiar with the psychological research on race?

Originally posted by inimalist

are you familiar with the psychological research on race?

That's what I wrote my doctoral thesis on.

Originally posted by Bardock42
That's what I wrote my doctoral thesis on.

you are right, i shouldn't start arguments i don't have the motivation to support

Originally posted by majid86
I meant all British Asians not just British Pakistanis and there is nothing wrong with our expansion, its not like we gonna kill every single white British person at all, our expansion is peaceful and is impossible to stop.

Bradford 2001 riots are nothing compared to what we will do to them if they provoke another race war with us in 2010. The richest man in the UK is a British Asian, we have British Asians in the new coalition government and in the new opposition and every other major UK political party, Soon we will have a British Asian in charge of the UK's armed forces and it will all become a reality in the next decade or so.

And if the white British people dont like it then they can either do something about it our go back to Saxony, Germany to where they originally came from.

What are you going on about?

Indians and Pakistanis cannot stand each other and you're talking about some kind of ''your people'' racial takeover of UK. It's just absurd.

Bradford riots were largely Asian Muslim riots. There weren't a whole lot of Hindus going ''in the name of Krishna, I will torch Bradford down''.
So general west Asians unity crap is just not working in this argument.
Pakistanis hate Indians, Indians hate Pakistanis, Sri Lankans hate Indians, Bangladeshi hate Pakistanis...Same thing like everywhere else in the world. (in groups of course, individuals can and do get on, as they should)

So you're not talking about Asian takeover, you're talking about Pakistani takeover, which won't happen (unless you kill off 80+ percent of UK white population.)

Originally posted by inimalist
lol, fair enough

lol

are you familiar with the psychological research on race?

lol

are you familiar with genetic and evolutionary research on race?

As far as psychology and 'race' are concerned, I'm only familiar with research on the subject of race and intelligence, probably less so than you. However, the fact that psychologists compare the results of IQ tests of groups of people they classify as white, black or asians does not turn said groups into actual biological races. And like I said, I'm extremelly skeptical of genetic explanations to the differences that have been encountered between the results of these groups.

So yeah, I'm gonna repeat that races don't exist in the human species and even if there were genetic traits causing significant differences in the average cognitive functions of distinct populations of humans like there are for skin color, races would still not exist, variation is clinal.

Originally posted by 753
lol

are you familiar with genetic and evolutionary research on race?

As far as psychology and 'race' are concerned, I'm only familiar with research on the subject of race and intelligence, probably less so than you. However, the fact that psychologists compare the results of IQ tests of groups of people they classify as white, black or asians does not turn said groups into actual biological races. And like I said, I'm extremelly skeptical of genetic explanations to the differences that have been encountered between the results of these groups.

So yeah, I'm gonna repeat that races don't exist in the human species and even if there were genetic traits causing significant differences in the average cognitive functions of distinct populations of humans like there are for skin color, races would still not exist, variation is clinal.

I don't understand.

If there are no races, who cleans all the houses? And where did all the melons and fried chicken go?