Rage.Of.Olympus
Senior Member
Originally posted by Stoic
You danced around everything that was posted, everything that I stated was in the comics themselves, not made up scenario's that you just posted, I'm not here to tell you how to properly debate, but to attempt to raise yourself up as someones superior isn't the right way to go about it.
😂
Originally posted by Stoic
Professor Hulk was clearly Thor's superior in the strength dept. showing his superiority by hand palming his face, chucking him into the arctic ocean like a child, and other such feats. Thor's eyes became red, and it was assumed that he entered Warrior Madness, which did not stop him from being slammed once more, and thrown away from the blast site, by an inferior Hulk than either WWHulk or World Breaker hulk.
😂
You need to re-read that fight. Preferably when your loins aren't burning for the color green.
Fun fact: It wasn't stated Thor entered Warrior Madness until the last panel of the fight.
Either way, it's just Thor cutting loose as he wanted to stop restraining himself against the Hulk.
Originally posted by Stoic
You obviously don't know as much about the Hulk as you would like people to subscribe to, or you would know that the Hulk has on two occasions been seperated from Banner. The Hulk without Banner is in fact souless and mindless, as seen when he beat up on both teams of Avengers which included classic Thors peer the Immortal Hercules.
I know plenty about the Hulk thank you very much. I just don't know him as well as I do Thor.
I know his mindless. I'm just not completely sure whether his soul less or not. So it was confirmed that the Hulk was soul less in that particular battle?
Poor Hercules. Is it not true that Thor went toe to toe with that same incarnation without any help?
Originally posted by Stoic
Let's talk about this invincible Thor that you want people to belive is such and such. Does anyone recall Mr. Hyde running into Thor and actually hurting him? Hyde did pass out, but Thor was anything but alright after the collision. This happened when the Masters of Evil beat herc into a coma, and took over the Avengers Mansion way back in the day.
😂 What the f*ck are you talking about? Good god.
When did I ever try to push Thor as invincible? Are you sure your reading my posts?
😂 Bringing up that scene really helps your case.
Thor was completely unharmed by the way:
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e139/RageOfTheGod/Thor/ThordefeatsHyde5.jpg
Originally posted by Stoic
As I stated earlier The Hulk that we are disscussing was not a dumb animal, he was actually and arguably more tactically sound than Thor. Possessing the intellect of one of the most brilliant scientists on Marvel Earth.
Lol.
Originally posted by Stoic
The Hulk was sucker punched when he was drained, as he had no idea what Tony was doing, and had he known he would have probably welcomed it. As Amadeus Cho pointed out, The Hulk is not a killer, but had all of the power to destroy every person on earth while in World Breaker Mode.
What the hell is this even supposed to be addressing in my post?
Originally posted by Stoic
You didn't offer any concrete evidence that a tactic like gamma absorption would be a decisive victory for Thor, The Hulk has been seen on many occasions to tunnel beneath the earth, at impressive speeds. See we can all use non canon scenario's to suit our arguments!
Concrete evidence? I thought I had but since you need some help:
Draining the Hulk of his energy has been shown to be a viable tactic. Even World Breaker Hulk. Thor has shown Mjolnir can absorb Gamma based energy and has drained the energy of various sources and beings throughout his history. In short, Thor can and will drain the Hulk of his power if he choose to do so.
What the f*ck are you talking about? When did I ever use a non cannon scenario? Your rambling. Stop.
Originally posted by Stoic
As I stated RK Thor and King Thor would win and this thread is spite on a grand scale. This is all that matters.RK Thor 10/10 ftw.
King Thor 10/10 ftw
Classic Thor 1/10 ftl
That's correct.
That's correct.
That's correct.
That's not correct.