Originally posted by Lord Lucien
facepalmNo, you half-wit. I asked if he made any good points and wanted to know why he was considered to have won, hence my follow-up question of "Was it because no one could argue against him?"
Which is obviously your attempt to insult me. Lucien, what I don't understand is that you think that I always debate poorly, when you actually don't look at the vast majority of my debates (not saying that you should, but you're being close minded). I'm actually debating in that thread pretty well.
I never admitted he won. I never said he won. I never conceded he won. I said nothing of the sort. Stop looking for hidden meaning and attacks against. I've actually been in that thread recently looking for wayward flaws in his points.
Then what is your point? You aren't fooling me; you were trying to indirectly insult me.
Jesus f*cking Christ.
What is it with you and your bias against me? Ever since that "What if the Empire invaded modern day Earth" thread you've been hating on me, despite me apologizing to you (even though, while I might have made some mistakes in that thread, you made far, far more) in both PMs and an entire thread devoted to that.
Originally posted by Zampanó
This is not so. His continuing pattern of passive-aggressive self-victimization, when combined with the absurdly personal nature of his intermittent outbursts (not to mention the longevity and import of fault within his construct of the dynamic at KMC) make him considerably more abrasive than you ever were, Neb.
Expect that I didn't do anything to "self victimize" myself in this thread or in the vast of the threads in which a lot of you bash me in.