Originally posted by Mindship
Starflight, especially FTL, is going to require such extraordinary technology, that by the time we have it we will likely have become unimaginably advanced in other areas as well, eg, medical, nano, AI, etc. I can't imagine that an FTL race would send down its people prior to a thorough evaluation of our environment--indeed, they would make such an eval before they even set off for our world: very soon (next 50 yrs, if not less) we will be able to detect specifics about extrasolar worlds, eg, atmospheric composition, and from there infer details about that planet's biosphere. And they won't have to send down troops: they could send robots, nanoscale to megascale. I mean, the options available to a civilization capable of FTL starflight, IMO, are just too many to even enumerate.The best comparison I can think of is: imagine an aircraft carrier sending out UAVs for multipurpose operations against islands whose inhabitants' best weapons are bows and arrows.
I really don't see any contest here.
i don't agree with that idea. even for us there are things that we are incredibly advanced in, while we're lacking in other areas. if you went 200 years back in time and told someone that we have created transportation that can take fly and move four times faster than the sound of your voice can reach their ear, and then in the same breath tell that person that every year a million people die from cancer, theyd laugh in your face. "surely," they'd say, "surely, if your society is so incredibly advanced that you can achieve faster than sound speeds, then surely you've designed a full-proof cure to cancer and most sicknesses?!" now, im sure you can list a hundred and one reasons for why we haven't created a full proof cure for cancer yet, but it doesnt matter. the point is that not all aspects of science grow evenly. the implication that FTL travel=bullet phasing shields+ultra bacterial adapters is crazy speculative.