Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
I thought this was on looks? I never though superman pissed off look overly bad ass to be honest.
this doesn't impress you at all?
Originally posted by Digi
I don't really think we should take into account how often a character is pissed. I think an objective test would be to take 3-4 angry stills of a character, show them to a non-comic fan, and ask them who looks the most badass.Superman wears underwear on the outside. He's not winning that test. Given the criteria I listed, Hulk would actually probably come out on top more often than not. I'll stick with Thor. He poses well, has a cape for emphasis, doesn't wear underwear on the outside (pr), and has the aforementioned weather affects to help the aura.
come on. so does batman, wolverine did for years, and so on and so forth. it's never been an issue.
http://img133.imageshack.us/i/23mw3.jpg/
biscuits
*no offense Digi*
Originally posted by -Pr-
compared to wolverine? the guy who gets angry when you use the last of the milk on him?
Originally posted by Digi
I don't really think we should take into account how often a character is pissed. I think an objective test would be to take 3-4 angry stills of a character, show them to a non-comic fan, and ask them who looks the most badass.
All more badass than the Supes pics posted. And that was just on page 1 of a google search. The hammer and armor help too, in addition to the lightning. His entire mystique is a bit more badass, imo.
Originally posted by Starscream M
wait, first this is a subjective question...so you can't really say superman isn't #1
True, but we're biased comic fans. Pr has read more Superman comics than any of us, I've read more Thor comics than most. We're not the best judges. Of course it's subjective, but you can create as much objectivity as possible in the scenario I suggested.
Or we can play semantics, whichever you prefer.
