Rage.Of.Olympus
Senior Member
Nowhere did I argue that Thor is harder to injure than either Norrin or Superman on average. He is however tougher than Norrin in my opinion, and once you reach the point where physical attacks effect them both, I'd say Thor can take it better.
Originally posted by kgkg
iic Thor said that none of his attack were doing anything to Durok … Surfer’s board was doing better than Thor yo. Thor tripping Durok doesn’t mean Thor was doing any better than Norrin. It would have been better if Thor was knocked out by a Durok punch than a high voltage cord? Shame really for a guy known as thunder god.
In the last issue, Thor state that every blow he struck against Durok did not affect him. Durok wasn't truly alive and did not tire so he could not truly die. That was the explanation in the story as I understood it. A bit of a Destroyer vibe going on. He could trade blows evenly, or knock him down with his attacks, but he just wasn't considered a living thing.
Based on their encounters, I'd say Durok is has the slight edge on a regular Thor in regards to strength.
Surfer's board charged at Durok -it might have zoomed around- and was logged at his throat. I'm not sure how to count that.
No, but Thor going toe to toe with Durok, trading blows evenly etc. is Thor faring better than Norirn.
When did I say that? I think it falls under the logic of powerful characters using debris. The voltage was what wore Thor out. That was the entire point of Loki's plot.