Iran announces first unarmed bomber!

Started by inimalist3 pages

The point of this is domestic, not international. The Iranian leadership wants the world to see its new weapons, so that it can convey to its people that it would be able to keep them safe in the event of an Israeli or American invasion.

But back to Blaxican's point, this won't keep them safe from either the US or Israel.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Maybe they (the Iranian government) are pathetic.

the simpliest explanation is usually the best alright!!

Originally posted by Robtard
But back to Blaxican's point, this won't keep them safe from either the US or Israel.

Exactly.

Originally posted by Robtard
But back to Blaxican's point, this won't keep them safe from either the US or Israel.

however, it does keep enough of the population under the control of the Clerics, as opposed to in outright revolt.

It requires tons of money being wasted on technology that doesn't work, to do that?

Originally posted by Robtard
But back to Blaxican's point, this won't keep them safe from either the US or Israel.

US may try the war, but it will end worse than Iraq or Afghanistan. People fail to release that Iran is neither Iraq nor Afghanistan and any attempts at 'warring' with them will end catastrophically for US, Israel and Iran.

If we take into consideration that a piss poor countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan could not be subjugated quickly, as originally thought by the US Administration and of course proved to be wrong, war with Iran will prove even more devastating.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
US may try the war, but it will end worse than Iraq or Afghanistan. People fail to release that Iran is neither Iraq nor Afghanistan and any attempts at 'warring' with them will end catastrophically for US, Israel and Iran.

If we take into consideration that a piss poor countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan could not be subjugated quickly, as originally thought by the US Administration and of course proved to be wrong, war with Iran will prove even more devastating.

But none of that will be due, in any way shape or form, to the creation of an unmanned bomber that is inferior to the unmanned bombers that already exist.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
US may try the war, but it will end worse than Iraq or Afghanistan. People fail to release that Iran is neither Iraq nor Afghanistan and any attempts at 'warring' with them will end catastrophically for US, Israel and Iran.

If we take into consideration that a piss poor countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan could not be subjugated quickly, as originally thought by the US Administration and of course proved to be wrong, war with Iran will prove even more devastating.

If the US tries to war with Iran like it did Iraq, it will fail, ie occupation and trying to bring "democracy" = fail, there's way to many outside factors.

Strategic strikes that will send Iran back 5-10 years military-wise will succeed; with ease. This is all that needs to be done, should Iran become a nuclear threat.

Personnally, I think the US will let Israel deal with Iran, should there be a need.

Originally posted by Robtard
If the US tries to war with Iran like it did Iraq, it will fail, ie occupation and trying to bring "democracy" = fail, there's way to many outside factors.

Strategic strikes that will send Iran back 5-10 years military-wise will succeed; with ease. This is all that needs to be done, should Iran become a nuclear threat.

Personnally, I think the US will let Israel deal with Iran, should there be a need.

I have my doubts about that, although it is certainly possible.

What I don't get is why isn't there a threat of war directed at North Korea who is already armed to their teeth?
Probably because China would go ape shit if US meddles anywhere near its boarders
Regardless, N. Korea seems far more trigger happy than Iran, yet somehow it is just left alone while Iran is constantly scrutinized.

Mark my words, war with Iran will NOT end well for the US and allies.

China - US relationship and N. Korea isn't oil rich. So the world is happy to let N. Korea hide in their corner and wave their big stick.

Really depends on the type of war.

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
It requires tons of money being wasted on technology that doesn't work, to do that?

yes

and, lets not balk entirely, its not a first class fighter bomber, or particularly threatening for any major power, it is something they didn't have before, and probably has some uses that expand Iran's military capabilities.

But more generally, Iran has frequent military demonstrations and other such things, to continutally put the fear of Western invasion in the minds of the people. This way, it looks like it is a choice between the vailiant Muslim clerics or utter despair.

America and Israel don't help this, though.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
North Korea who is already armed to their teeth?

bingo

he can hit back

Iran has oil, N. Korea doesn't

Israel will strike Iran like what they did to Iraq in 1981

I just watched ironman

They can't even reach Israel. Not a major threat. For now.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
I have my doubts about that, although it is certainly possible.

What I don't get is why isn't there a threat of war directed at North Korea who is already armed to their teeth?
Probably because China would go ape shit if US meddles anywhere near its boarders
Regardless, N. Korea seems far more trigger happy than Iran, yet somehow it is just left alone while Iran is constantly scrutinized.

Mark my words, war with Iran will NOT end well for the US and allies.

What exactly do you think would happen? Just curious.