The Forum Appendix: The KillerMovies Wikispace · Comic Book 'Versus' Forum

Astner The Ghost Who Walks

Originally posted by Bentley
Ok, so how is Dynamic force different from Physical Destructive Capacity?

For our purposes it isn't at all.

Originally posted by Bentley
Edit: Are this categories messured in terms of the same values (example: Those in the Energy output page) or they have different terms each?

No, dynamic force will be measured in Newtwon and static force will be measured in Kilograms.

I know it might sound like a missnominer but so is out reaction speed which is actually meassured in time.

Astner The Ghost Who Walks

Made the static strength list.

http://killermovies.wikispaces.com/Static+force

Astner The Ghost Who Walks

I also got rid of the tertiary, secondary, primary bullshit and created individual tiers for where it was necessary.

http://killermovies.wikispaces.com/Travel+speed

Black bolt z Mindsets Master

Originally posted by Astner
I also got rid of the tertiary, secondary, primary bullshit and created individual tiers for where it was necessary.
http://killermovies.wikispaces.com/Travel+speed

Well that makes things confusing.

and what was it I am supposed to vote on?

Black bolt z Mindsets Master

In the template should we add an area for intelligence?

Astner The Ghost Who Walks

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Well that makes things confusing.
and what was it I am supposed to vote on?

Whether or not we should rather than just name the article after the name of a character put: <Fiction> - <object> - <character name>, i.e. Marvel comics - character - Thanos, DC comics - item - Spear of destiny.

It's beneficial for characters from different fictions with the same names. Dante, Thor, etc.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
In the template should we add an area for intelligence?

It should fall under power and abilities. It's rather hard to compress intelligence based achievements into one or two words.

Speaking of which the template will change, destructive capacity is better covered by one list than by four (since they'd be next to identical either way).

Black bolt z Mindsets Master

Originally posted by Astner
Whether or not we should rather than just name the article after the name of a character put: <Fiction> - <object> - <character name>, i.e. Marvel comics - character - Thanos, DC comics - item - Spear of destiny.
It's beneficial for characters from different fictions with the same names. Dante, Thor, etc.
It should fall under power and abilities. It's rather hard to compress intelligence based achievements into one or two words.
Speaking of which the template will change, destructive capacity is better covered by one list than by four (since they'd be next to identical either way).

To me it sounds like too much trouble.After the name of the character we have what series they are from so same name characters will have a difference.

K.ANd and should we do with characters who still currently have the abilities section?

King Castle Restricted

thinking if i should place all the Asgardian weapons under one page.

or should they all get there own individual page?

Black bolt z Mindsets Master

Originally posted by King Castle
thinking if i should place all the Asgardian weapons under one page.
or should they all get there own individual page?

I'd say their own page but probably get one or two more opinions.

Black bolt z Mindsets Master

Joker added.

Bentley Seitei

Wow, the main template changed A LOT, but I aprove!

Black bolt z Mindsets Master

Originally posted by Bentley
Wow, the main template changed A LOT, but I aprove!

What changed? Theres no abilities section anymore but thats it.

Bentley Seitei

Endurance just has two rows and Destructive capacity just one.

Black bolt z Mindsets Master

Originally posted by Bentley
Endurance just has two rows and Destructive capacity just one.

Edit: Now I see it. We need to stop changing it and decide on one template before we make any more.Because then we have different characters with different templates which doesn't look good.

Bentley Seitei

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Edit: Now I see it. We need to stop changing it and decide on one template before we make any more.Because then we have different characters with different templates which doesn't look good.

I just checked and it seems to be the case uhuh

Edit: I think this one can be the keeper, it's short and less prone to random ambiguities than the previous ones, although I did like describing the things we should consider "standard equipment" because the term is thrown around this forum. It can be done not in the table though.

Black bolt z Mindsets Master

Originally posted by Bentley
I just checked and it seems to be the case uhuh

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Edit: Now I see it. We need to stop changing it and decide on one template before we make any more.Because then we have different characters with different templates which doesn't look good.

Bentley Seitei

I noticed already you silly 😄

What do you think about this kind of table?

Black bolt z Mindsets Master

Originally posted by Bentley
I noticed already you silly 😄
What do you think about this kind of table?

Read the post that you "saw". It states my opinion.

Bentley Seitei

Yeah, but I think we all agree in that the templates are supposed to be defined and standarized as soon as possible, my question was more of the type "do you find it acceptable?"

I think it comprises the most important things concerning battle status and it's short, so I'd buy it.

Black bolt z Mindsets Master

Originally posted by Bentley
Yeah, but I think we all agree in that the templates are supposed to be defined and standarized as soon as possible, my question was more of the type "do you find it acceptable?"
I think it comprises the most important things concerning battle status and it's short, so I'd buy it.

I actually perfer the first one since it had the most info possible(I still don't understand the difference between dynamic force and physical) but all in all I don't care "that" much just so long as we get a permanent template soon.