Ra's al Ghul w/ Muramasa Sword vs Wolverine

Originally posted by Omega Vision
If we want to talk experience R'as has Wolverine beat by about 600-700 years.

However Wolverine mast was in the thousands and could impart knowledge into his students. Wolverine also defeated thounds year old swordmaster in angle of death numerous times.

Ras has nothing on Wolverine. He not as skilled, his feats arnt as good. He physicaly inferior. Oh and Wolverine the superior swordsmaster......and that his bread and butter.

but I like that you nit picked a single part of my arguement, while ignoring the whole of it.

Originally posted by tsscls
If it's just a TKO. then Ra's.
For the kill, Wolverine.

😆

that all this statement deserves......

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
it won't

I thought one of the problems Daken had with it was it was specifically not as strong as his adamantium claws and he had to be careful with it or it could break?

And against adamantium...

Logan KO'd a brick from different dimension... with a bokken.

Originally posted by Q99
I thought one of the problems Daken had with it was it was specifically not as strong as his adamantium claws and he had to be careful with it or it could break?

And against adamantium...

reason they sheathed it with adamatium was to protect the rest of his body from it.

Originally posted by Q99
I thought one of the problems Daken had with it was it was specifically not as strong as his adamantium claws and he had to be careful with it or it could break?

And against adamantium...

The problem was that his claws weren't anchored to the adamantium, but to the normal bone. Muramasa claws got dislocated and he was helpless.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
No he doesent. Ras was stated as beign around 500, your exaggerating his age. That make him 350 years older then Wolverine.

However Wolverine mast was in the thousands and could impart knowledge into his students. Wolverine also defeated thounds year old swordmaster in angle of death numerous times.

Ras has nothing on Wolverine. He not as skilled, his feats arnt as good. He physicaly inferior. Oh and Wolverine the superior swordsmaster......and that his bread and butter.

but I like that you nit picked a single part of my arguement, while ignoring the whole of it.

There have been a lot of ages given ranging from 450 to 700 years old.

It really doesn't matter either way, I'm just pointing out the stupidity of the experience argument in comics since all things being equal if experience was that important Thor would be a Top Tier MA.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan

Beat me to it again 😂

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
The problem was that his claws weren't anchored to the adamantium, but to the normal bone. Muramasa claws got dislocated and he was helpless.

Ah, I see.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
His Countdown Bio says "many centuries ago" and the art indicates Middle Age Arabia, IE before 500 years ago.
http://www.dccomics.com/dcu/heroes_and_villains/?hv=origin_stories/ras_al_ghul&p=1

The art.......come on man now your stretching big time......

Originally posted by Omega Vision
There have been a lot of ages given ranging from 450 to 700 years old.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
It really doesn't matter either way, I'm just pointing out the stupidity of the experience argument in comics since all things being equal if experience was that important Thor would be a Top Tier MA.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Beat me to it again 😂

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
First that doesent prove he more then 500 years old. Hell that doesent even prove he more then 3 hundred years old. Many simply mean more then two.

Did you even read the resurrection of Ras al Ghul? Your referring to the pre-crisis version of the character.
The post crisis version is far older.
Morrison basically established that Ras is at least over 600 years old, hes easily older than Wolverine.

The Lazuras pits give him enhanced speed and strength. Batman has never defeated a just out of the lazuras pit Ras because that would be too hard for him.

Originally posted by SasuOna
Did you even read the resurrection of Ras al Ghul? Your referring to the pre-crisis version of the character.
The post crisis version is far older.
Morrison basically established that Ras is at least over 600 years old, hes easily older than Wolverine.

The Lazuras pits give him enhanced speed and strength. Batman has never defeated a just out of the lazuras pit Ras because that would be too hard for him.

Prove it. Prove that it gives him inhuman strength and speed. also why would we assume he jsut got out of the pit? Thats a pretty riduclous assumption no? (if your not willing to prove both, prove this one, the age one is pretty irrelevent, I jsut simply don't believe it.)

again why does ras win?

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
Oh and Wolverine the superior swordsmaster......and that his bread and butter.

Actually, according to his bio, he is 700 years old.

Originally posted by Starscream M
why would that matter even if true? logan doesn't have a sword in this fight

Originally posted by Prep-Man
Actually, according to his bio, he is 700 years old.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
becuase Logans far better with his claws, and if he even better then Ra's with swords, it makes this fight pretty dam one sided.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
bio again arnt usable on the boards.

Read Morrison's Ra's storyline. I believe it's there. You can't just dismiss it, because you haven't read it.

Originally posted by Starscream M
your logic is truly impeccable. 🙄

Logan skills with claws>>>>sword

Logan skill with swords>>>>Ras

Then logically he going to beat Ras.

Not to mention the numerous times he defeated people more skilled, as skilled, more experienced then Ras, using his claws.