King Kong versus the Hydes...

Started by Rogue Jedi5 pages

Originally posted by Robtard
BBA used MMA, he punched, kicked, threw his opponents and used joint manipulation.

Kong was more of a joke, but he punched, kicked and uses a couple of body throws.

But really, why not just accept that the Hydes are outclassed in this fight and move on?

Miss this?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I don't think it's as easy as all that. I'm pretty much undecided, but "Kong stomps!!!" Yeah, I have trouble believing that.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
OK, the Spidey comment was a bit out there. But they were quite adept at climbing shit.

IF one of them get on Kong's back, it'd be easy for them to destroy his eyes, you can't deny this. Imagine a cat on your head, dead set on not being removed, it'd take you a few seconds to remove it.

I agree they were adept at climbing shit, but Kong was pretty masterful considering he climbed the Empire State Building. And also your comparison isn't that well because us as humans do not have the durability that Kong does. Kong would not only remove it probably not hurt, but he would probably send one of them flying football fields.

I guess.

No, I didn't. Though it has nothing to do with what I said.

"Undecided" is not accepting the logical outcome and moving on.

Originally posted by Robtard
No, I didn't. Though it has nothing to do with what I said.

"Undecided" is not accepting the logical outcome and moving on.

Sue me? What's it matter to you? Let me remain undecided and you move on. By not moving on, you're doing the same thing you are accusing me of ✅

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Sue me? What's it matter to you? Let me remain undecided and you move on.

By not moving on, you're doing the same thing you are accusing me of ✅

Except you're clearly not undecided when you keep coming back with wacky angles in how the Hydes would win. "Eye scratching" being the latest.

No, dude. If you're still debating pro Hyde, the debate is ongoing, obviously.

Originally posted by Robtard
Except you're clearly not undecided when you keep coming back with wacky angles in how the Hydes would win. "Eye scratching" being the latest.

No, dude. If you're still debating pro Hyde, the debate is ongoing, obviously.

I am debating ways the Hydes COULD win, not WOULD win, there's a big difference.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I am debating ways the Hydes COULD win, not WOULD win, there's a big difference.

I accept your concession.

Originally posted by Robtard
I accept your concession.
It's not a concession, I'm still undecided.