Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
No. Dre is more evasive, more athletic, more agile, Daniel is gonna have a hard time tagging him.They aren't fighting for points here, this is a street fight. Daniel lost a coupla times over to Johnny, if we go by street fight rules.
Dre goes Chi, Daniel is hypnotized, Dre scissor kicks him in the back of the head.
He's still a little kid, without the rules of the match, then he's even more ****ed here. Daniel's could outright kill him via choking or curb-stomp.
Dre won't go "Chi", he'll be dropped long before he starts to stare and move his arms in a stupid fashion. 70lbs 10 year old, dude.
This another one of those threads where it's painfully obvious that one side wins, yet you be you. Do you think Dre could have beaten you when you where a highshooler? <-- serious question
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Read the OP. This is Daniel from the first Karate Kid movie. That was the second one. He was older, stronger, faster, and had more training. AND the only reason Daniel beat him was because of those little drum thingies.
KK2 Daniel was the same age, height, weight, had the same strength, speed, and skills as from KK1. Don't try to make it as if Daniel was 15 years older and was trained by Pei Mei. The only new technique learned was the drum technique, to which was used, in a street fight, in the final scene. There were no rules and no limitations. Even without using the drum technique, Chozen was plenty bloodied up by the end of the fight. Why? Because there were no rules and Daniel used the skills he was taught by Miyagi. To say that Dre could best Chozen in a no rules bout is just delusional.
Again, Daniel has more body mass. He's taller, heavier, stronger and has more center of gravity than Dre. There is no way the little black kid is going to win in a no rules bout. And the whole "hypnotize chi" thing? It's a trifle overrated.
Originally posted by Robtard
He's still a little kid, without the rules of the match, then he's even more ****ed here. Daniel's could outright kill him via choking or curb-stomp.Dre won't go "Chi", he'll be dropped long before he starts to stare and move his arms in a stupid fashion. 70lbs 10 year old, dude.
This another one of those threads where it's painfully obvious that one side wins, yet you be you. Do you think Dre could have beaten you when you where a highshooler? <-- serious question
I reckon he'll say yes to prove his point.
Originally posted by ImpedimentOK let's take this step by step. How long was it from : A-Daniel beginning his training with Myagi, to B-Daniel winning the tournament?
KK2 Daniel was the same age, height, weight, had the same strength, speed, and skills as from KK1. Don't try to make it as if Daniel was 15 years older and was trained by Pei Mei. The only new technique learned was the drum technique, to which was used, in a street fight, in the final scene. There were no rules and no limitations. Even without using the drum technique, Chozen was plenty bloodied up by the end of the fight. Why? Because there were no rules and Daniel used the skills he was taught by Miyagi. To say that Dre could best Chozen in a no rules bout is just delusional.Again, Daniel has more body mass. He's taller, heavier, stronger and has more center of gravity than Dre. There is no way the little black kid is going to win in a no rules bout. And the whole "hypnotize chi" thing? It's a trifle overrated.
Dre whoops Daniel's ass. 😬
You guys are weird. Daniel didn't show good fighting even when he was winning , he was fighting like fat 8 year olds who are enrolled by their parents fight in tournaments. Dre showed much better damage soak and stronger and faster moves.The fact that his fights were less realistic and more "entertainment" orientated, are pretty much the reasons why he's a better fighter.
Plus, the the newer movie was much better than the original.