Morlun vs Wolverine

Started by King Castle8 pages

i seriously doubt Wakanda should have even bn capable of making Secondary Adamantium..on their own.

Probably begged shield for some adamantium filament strips for their net weaving and hopes to study it and steal the process which obviously failed since the best use they came up with it was to add it to straw rope net. 🤣 😆

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
what a waste of time.

What we know is that was certain not A grade primary adamatium.

Prove it.

okay, look at the net.

I did.

Still waiting for proof.

Until proven otherwise, Wolverine's face gets a one way ticket to the great white north.

it doesnt act like adamantium.

adamantium does not bend nor fold in order to be made into a a net.

what did wakandans due bond it to a molecular lvl it still wouldnt allow for it to bend and fold to the extreme needed for a net.

Originally posted by Mindset
Prove it.

Prove that it is.

For starters it not nearl malleable enough. Whole point of carbon adamatium is that it far more maullable to work with able to make tenticals needed for Omega Red. This is stated in any refferences guide , any hand book under omega red should have this. Also stated in uncanny x-men I believe.

Also the fact it got ripped, which that in it self would not make it primary adamatium.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
Prove that it is.

For starters it not nearl malleable enough. Whole point of carbon adamatium is that it far more maullable to work with able to make tenticals needed for Omega Red. This is stated in any refferences guide , any hand book under omega red should have this. Also stated in uncanny x-men I believe.

Also the fact it got ripped, which that in it self would not make it primary adamatium.

And still, I don't need to. 😬

None of that makes it not primary adamantium, it makes it not the primary adamantium you've seen before.

so you think that Wakandans discovered how to make Adamantium malleable and usable as a rope type material?

lets say they did do you think it would be equally strong as a solid bar of adamantium?

Originally posted by Mindset
And still, I don't need to. 😬

None of that makes it not primary adamantium, it makes it not the primary adamantium you've seen before.


yes you do, there zero evidences it primary adamatium

It not primary adamatium. It acts nothing like it, it far more malluable and far less durable. Also zero evidences they even know how to make primary adamatium, and there really zero evidences that it is primary adamatium.

prove it not secondary adamatium.

Dum Dum you should sign up in the wiki killermovie forum and help me with the Weapon X/wolverine characters.

http://killermovies.wikispaces.com/

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
yes you do, there zero evidences it primary adamatium

It not primary adamatium. It acts nothing like it, it far more malluable and far less durable. Also zero evidences they even know how to make primary adamatium, and there really zero evidences that it is primary adamatium.

prove it not secondary adamatium.

No, I don't. I never claimed it was, I claimed you can't prove that it is or isn't.
Originally posted by King Castle
so you think that Wakandans discovered how to make Adamantium malleable and usable as a rope type material?

lets say they did do you think it would be equally strong as a solid bar of adamantium?

Maybe.

Originally posted by Mindset
No, I don't. I never claimed it was, I claimed you can't prove that it is or isn't. Maybe.

so this debate pointless. and your argueing to argue.

Originally posted by King Castle
Dum Dum you should sign up in the wiki killermovie forum and help me with the Weapon X/wolverine characters.

http://killermovies.wikispaces.com/


me and wiki dont get along.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
so this debate pointless. and your argueing to argue.
No, I'm pointing out that you can't prove your claim with any certainty.

Originally posted by Mindset
No, I'm pointing out that you can't prove your claim with any certainty.

we can make a pretty well educated guess. There much more evidences point to one side then the other.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
we can make a pretty well educated guess. There much more evidences point to one side then the other.
Not really, since we don't know how the net was made, it could be primary adamantium as far as we know. Nor does the dialogue point to it being one of the other. When something is simply called adamantium is it usually talking about secondary adamantium?

Originally posted by Mindset
When something is simply called adamantium is it usually talking about secondary adamantium?

yes, but there are exceptions.

Don't lie.

Originally posted by Mindset
Not really, since we don't know how the net was made, it could be primary adamantium as far as we know. Nor does the dialogue point to it being one of the other. When something is simply called adamantium is it usually talking about secondary adamantium?

But yes here what we do know.

Wanka never shown any knowledge of how to make primary adamatium

We know primary is not very malleable adamatium which is what led to carbon adamatium being made if not mistaken

We know primary adamatium is industructable.