Originally posted by Mindset
Wakanda has shown knowledge of how to make secondary adamantium? Anyway, it doesn't matter if they have or not.We know that a substance identified simply as adamantium was shown to be malleable.
Primary adamantium isn't indestructible.
which we know primary adamatiun not
yes it is, unless manipulated like magneto did.
Originally posted by Mindset
No, it's not more reasonable to assume it's one over the other unless you want to believe it's secondary for some reason.We know the primary we've seen before is not, that doesn't mean the primary adamantium Wakanda had isn't.
Did Hulk have Magneto in his fist when he dented it?
then it would not be primary adamatiun. Your entire arguement is retarded. Your trying to pretend it reasonable to believe the wanka found a magaical new adamatium that is super malluable, dispite zero explanation.....or even being implied.... 🙄
That was not stated to be primary adamatium, it again was simply stated as adamatium. which again would most likely being the most common, which is secondary. Also do you know how many times Hulk has failed to damage adamatium?
It's not logical to assume. That's for dumber people. You don't want to be one of them.
No, that would make it not the primary adamantium you've experienced before. My entire argument is that you can't prove it's secondary beyond a doubt. No explanation is needed.
I know he damaged a supposed indestructible metal.
Originally posted by Mindset
It's not logical to assume.No, that would make it not the primary adamantium you've experienced before. My entire argument is that you can't prove it's secondary beyond a doubt. No explanation is needed.
I know he damaged a supposed indestructible metal.
We can prove it not primary adamatiun, your simply argueing semantics at this point.
Well it was not primary adamatiun so irrelevant.
So if the metal not is strong as primary adamatium and it far more malleable, it pretty save to say it not primary adamatium
Originally posted by Mindset
OK, prove it's not primary adamantium.You have no proof that wasn't as strong as primary adamantium.
Yes I do, first primary adamatium is not the malleable which you keep ignoring
second there is prove it not as strong. Becuase it was broken, by individual who has not shown anything on characters levels who have failed to break primary adamatium like Hulk, Thing,Tiger Shark, Namor ect.
I don't think adamantium is truly "indestructable" no different than Juggernaut isn't really "invincible". Extremely, extremely tough, but not indestructable to say Galactus or LT using force. It is the strongest Earth metal.
Lol at you guys arguing. Either way no way Omega Red beats Iron Man in a straight up match. Iron Man beats the living piss out of him. While Drunk.
Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
Yes they could, the could both damage secondary adamatium. I actually say damaginf stark armor is as impressive as breaking out of adamatium net. It hard to even tell how much damage Morlun did to the actual nets. Actaully I say more things have damage secondary adamatium then have pieced Starks armor.Several people and pobjects have destroy and damage secondary adamatium it far less durable. Adamatium needles have been broken and damage simply trying to peirce hulks skin....
Prove Colossus can even dent secondary adamantium. You're basing your point entirely on your speculation of how secondary adamantium works, and this Colossus assumption is as null as many of your other claims.
Originally posted by MindsetHell, it wasn't even any sort of adamantium, because no adamantium looks like that. It was a rope that they named Adamantium.
When something is called adamantium that means it's secondary when you want it to be.Come on, Bran, you should know this.
My theory is sound, because I'm right.
PIS = Plot Induced Stupidity
At times, for the sake of the plot, characters that are immensely more powerful than their opponent will "job" to carry on the plot of the story, even though the characters powers and history would clearly show that they are more than capable of destroying their opponent. For this reason we have a No PIS Rule. This rule prohibits the use of such instances of PIS from being used as evidence in debates.
b/c Digi set so.. wink
i fall back on PIS and i like a Mod ruling.