Darkseid/Thanos vs Team

I showed that they have feats that can be compared in order to try and determine which is superior. I could also back up claims in regards to which one has a better healing factor, is more durable, faster etc.

Which brings us back to, you shouldn't make claims that you can't back up.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I showed that they have feats that can be compared in order to try and determine which is superior. I could also back up claims in regards to which one has a better healing factor, is more durable, faster etc.

Which brings us back to, you shouldn't make claims that you can't back up.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You still won't answer my question. I will ask again since you claimed feats can be determined to definitively prove who is stronger since you mentioned this feat does it prove this Hulk is stronger than Superman.

Sure, just as soon as you quote where I said "feats can be determined to definitively prove who is stronger".

Originally posted by Silent Master
I showed that they have feats that can be compared in order to try and determine which is superior. I could also back up claims in regards to which one has a better healing factor, is more durable, faster etc.

Which brings us back to, you shouldn't make claims that you can't back up.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Sure, just as soon as you quote where I said [b]"feats can be determined to definitively prove who is stronger". [/B]

IMO, destroying an asteroid 2x the size of Earth is better than failing to destroy the moon.

Originally posted by Silent Master
IMO, destroying an asteroid 2x the size of Earth is better than failing to destroy the moon.

What does that question have to do with whether or not those two feats can be compared?

Originally posted by Silent Master
What does that question have to do with whether or not those two feats can be compared?

Quote where I stated that "feats can determine who is stronger"

Originally posted by Silent Master
I showed that they have feats that can be compared in order to try and determine which is superior. I could also back up claims in regards to which one has a better healing factor, is more durable, faster etc.

Which brings us back to, you shouldn't make claims that you can't back up.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Quote where I stated that "feats can determine who is stronger"

I didn't ask you to quote me saying that "feats that can be compared in order to try and determine which is superior" I asked for you to quote me saying "feats can determine who is stronger Like you claimed.

BTW, since I know that you have trouble with simple concepts, if I had been talking about strength of the characters and not how the feats stack up, I'd have used the word stronger rather than superior.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I didn't ask you to quote me saying that "feats that can be compared in order to try and determine which is superior" I asked for you to quote me saying [b]"feats can determine who is stronger Like you claimed.

BTW, since I know that you have trouble with simple concepts, if I had been talking about strength of the characters and not how the feats stack up, I'd have used the word stronger rather than superior. [/B]

Originally posted by quanchi112
So superior doesn't mean stronger in the way you implied it since we are comparing strength feats I guess saying superior doesn't mean stronger. Wow.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Superior doesn't mean physically stronger.Not always.

Originally posted by quanchi112
We were discussing strength feats so the superior of the two feats doesn't mean stronger ? I mean really.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So superior doesn't mean stronger in the way you implied it since we are comparing strength feats I guess saying superior doesn't mean stronger. Wow.

I was talking about comparing those two specific feats, therefore my use of the word superior would indicate that I was saying that one of the feats is superior to the other.

BTW, you really need to learn the difference between imply and infer.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I was talking about comparing those two specific feats, therefore my use of the word superior would indicate that I was saying that one of the feats is superior to the other.

BTW, you really need to learn the difference between imply and infer.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you didn't mean which strength feat was superior to the other. That's why I asked the question if you believe based on these two feats if the Hulk is stronger than Superman since you said feats can prove which is superior here.

Again, I said that it was possible to compare two feats and determine which(feat) is superior. and then I posted two feats which proved my point.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, I said that it was possible to compare two feats and determine which(feat) is superior. and then I posted two feats which proved my point.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So by saying which feat is superior you are saying who is stronger, right ?

By saying which feat is superior, I'm saying which of those two specific feats is more impressive.

Back on topic, you should stick with claims that you can actually back up.