Darkseid/Thanos vs Team · Comic Book 'Versus' Forum

Silent Master Senior Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, you're known for this on herochat and repeating yourself in an endless loop avoiding all questions won't fly here.

I only end up repeating myself because like you refuse to back up their claims.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Silent Master
I only end up repeating myself because like you refuse to back up their claims.

I stated my reasoning as to why I came up to my conclusion do you agree with it or not ?

Silent Master Senior Member

Again, your reasoning isn't proof. I asked for proof.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, your reasoning isn't proof. I asked for proof.

So you shouldn't debate on here as most things can't be proven. You should never argue against a dc or marvel character as nothing can be definitively proven.

Silent Master Senior Member

You shouldn't make claims that you can't back up.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Silent Master
You shouldn't make claims that you can't back up.

read the rules. You can argue hulk vs. superman and back up those claims. there is no definitive proof there though either. You seem very new to comic debating.

Silent Master Senior Member

Only there is proof in that type of debate, as both characters have feats that can be quantified and compared.

You however are trying to use feats that can't be quantified and then claiming that one specific blast is more powerful than Odin's best.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Silent Master
Only there is proof in that type of debate, as both characters have feats that can be quantified and compared.
You however are trying to use feats that can't be quantified and then claiming that one specific blast is more powerful than Odin's best.

No, in this kind of debate unless you have a writer specifically comparing these two blasts we speculate just like Hulk vs. Superman. It's two different writers as well which always muddies the waters. I mean come on this isn't rocket science.

Silent Master Senior Member

So, you’re actually claiming that failing to destroy the moon with punches can’t be compared to destroying an asteroid that is 2x the size of Earth?

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Silent Master
So, you’re actually claiming that failing to destroy the moon with punches can’t be compared to destroying an asteroid that is 2x the size of Earth?

That's collateral damage against an object which is completely different than blasting a character. Or do you feel there's no difference between the two ?

Silent Master Senior Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
That's collateral damage against an object which is completely different than blasting a character. Or do you feel there's no difference between the two ?

So you admit that the Hulk and Superman actually have feats that can be compared to determine which is superior, which shoots a whole in your theory that "most things can't be proven".

You should really stick to claims that you can actually back up.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Silent Master
So you admit that the Hulk and Superman actually have feats that can be compared to determine which is superior, which shoots a whole in your theory that [b]"most things can't be proven".
You should really stick to claims that you can actually back up. [/B]

That can't be proven either because those feats are exclusive to those characters. You can present your case and try to prove it but you can't definitively prove it.

I enjoy you dodging all my questions while I answer all of yours it signifies a good debater as opposed to a bad debater.

Silent Master Senior Member

Let me get this right, you're claiming that destroying an asteroid that is twice the size of the Earth can't be proven to be a superior feat than failing to destroy the moon?

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Silent Master
Let me get this right, you're claiming that destroying an asteroid that is twice the size of the Earth can't be proven to be a superior feat than failing to destroy the moon?

Originally posted by quanchi112
That's collateral damage against an object which is completely different than blasting a character. Or do you feel there's no difference between the two ?

Do it again and I will report you. i answered this two posts up.

Silent Master Senior Member

How exactly did that answer my question?

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Silent Master
How exactly did that answer my question?

I said it's a different thing altogether than what we are discussing and different writers have different power levels in and with these characters anyways.

Silent Master Senior Member

Saying it's different doesn't answer the question that I asked.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Silent Master
Saying it's different doesn't answer the question that I asked.

It's completely irrelevant to what we are discussing here. You have a habit of avoiding the discussion at hand with questions surrounding other things.

Silent Master Senior Member

You said

Originally posted by quanchi112
read the rules. You can argue hulk vs. superman and back up those claims. there is no definitive proof there though either. You seem very new to comic debating.

So whether or not their feats can be compared actually is relevant to what we are discussing here.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Silent Master
You said
So whether or not their feats can be compared actually is relevant to what we are discussing here.

So you feel that's definitive proof ? Is Gray Hulk stronger than Superman iyo ?

That's hardly relevant to what we are discussing but go ahead and answer it.