Originally posted by Black bolt zSo they could have beaten him without a cc in that scenario ? Wow. Like I said you don't grasp the source material.
You don't comprehend that it showed them charge him and that was it.And once again and please listen [b]A CC WAS NOT NEEDED, IT WAS USED NOT NEEDED!!!!
[/B]
Originally posted by Black bolt z
You don't comprehend that it showed them charge him and that was it.And once again and please listen [b]A CC WAS NOT NEEDED, IT WAS USED NOT NEEDED!!!!
[/B]
Yet you have no idea what else they could've done right? They were all running for their lives from Thanos and did try and stop him. They COULDN'T. All that did stop him was a CC. End of story. Unless they said what else they could've done, you're only speculating.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiI know they couldn't stop him by themselves.But thanos on many occasions had been KO'd by less then 1% of a CC.
Yet you have no idea what else they could've done right? They were all running for their lives from Thanos and did try and stop him. They COULDN'T. All that did stop him was a CC. End of story. Unless they said what else they could've done, you're only speculating.
They didn't have the power by themselves but the CC was just massive overkill.Do you agree?
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi👆
No it wasn't massive overkill at all. It didn't even kill him. If it killed him that would be overkill and it didn't even do that. It barely even KO'd him.. it took the CC to put him down and then 3 of the most powerful TP people in Marvel just to keep him in that state. So no it wasn't overkill
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiYour basing your opinion off the fact that Galactus feared Tyrant 😆
Again you're focusing on just the blasts empowering or not empowering Tyrant... these aren't the only circumstances are they?1. Why did Galactus back down from Tyrant and let me take his herald the first time they met... Galactus didn't say...oo because you're dangerous and my blasts empower you did he? No.. He said.. because Galaxies would be destroyed in the collateral damage of their fight and he didn't want that. Hmmmmm seems to be very clear to me and the reader doesn't it? He feared Galaxies being destroyed as a side effect of their fight NOT because his blasts would empower Tyrant
2. Galactus has met numerous foes and acted condescending towards them... InBetweener, Mephisto (in his realm) and even Odin. Yet did he act this way against Tyrant? No... he feed on a planet to be at a high level of power.. so high in fact he hadn't felt that good in ages. And he prepped for him not act condescending to him right? Does these things sounds like someone who views Tyrant as a legitimate threat or someone he isn't worried about like how he acted like Odin was an insect? Of course not, he clearly feared Tyrant and his power.
Thanos is a skyfather.. an amped and prepped Skyfather and Tyrant was going to kill him and beat thanos. Yet how is this not a skyfather level feat? Please explain that
Originally posted by quanchi112Drax with he anti matter.Or the black hole.
Name me one timem when Thanos was ko'd by less.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiYour referring to TI right?You do know it didn't show thanos when they charged at him right?
No it wasn't massive overkill at all. It didn't even kill him. If it killed him that would be overkill and it didn't even do that. It barely even KO'd him.. it took the CC to put him down and then 3 of the most powerful TP people in Marvel just to keep him in that state. So no it wasn't overkill
Originally posted by Black bolt zYes, he was weakened. reread the story. I tire of you not knowing the source material.
No he wasn't really weakeded.And so how does it help your case that he was KO'd and not killed?
If he's killed he comes right back if he is ko'd he loses. You aren't old enough to challenge me, sport.
Originally posted by quanchi112He was weakened when he woke up.By the time drax attacked him he was at full power.
Yes, he was weakened. reread the story. I tire of you not knowing the source material.If he's killed he comes right back if he is ko'd he loses. You aren't old enough to challenge me, sport.
Exactly.Anti matter killed him.A CC>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Anti matter.
It should be able to kill him or KO him.Whatever it likes.
Originally posted by Black bolt zYes, he was weakened. Reread the arc.
He was weakened when he woke up.By the time drax attacked him he was at full power.Exactly.Anti matter killed him.A CC>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Anti matter.It should be able to kill him or KO him.Whatever it likes.
I said explain one time when he was ko'd and you can't even do that. Asking you any question and watching you guess is truly amusing. You have no idea about anything.
It killed him it didn't ko him. You seem to think koing someone is the same thing. Another def you can't figure out.
Originally posted by Black bolt z
He was weakened when he woke up.By the time drax attacked him he was at full power.Exactly.Anti matter killed him.A CC>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Anti matter.It should be able to kill him or KO him.Whatever it likes.
U honestly have NO CLUE what you're talking about. Go by T.I. and read the story again. He was weakened throughout the ENTIRE story. Even right before Drax attacked him.. they stated he had REGAINED TOO MUCH power.. NOT ALL or HE'S BACK AT FULL POWER.. He regained to much for them to mentally control. Then in the next book AFTER drax killed him they even referenced him still regaining strength... making it clear he was still in the process of gaining all his power back. To say nothing of the fact that in one of the early T.I.'s R.R. stated that his durability appeared weaker than normal. Add it all up... he was weakened and not at his normal durability and yet he still wrecked.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiYes I know he was weaked in the beginning.But this is hours later in the 3rd comic that drax does this.
U honestly have NO CLUE what you're talking about. Go by T.I. and read the story again. He was weakened throughout the ENTIRE story. Even right before Drax attacked him.. they stated he had REGAINED TOO MUCH power.. NOT ALL or HE'S BACK AT FULL POWER.. He regained to much for them to mentally control. Then in the next book AFTER drax killed him they even referenced him still regaining strength... making it clear he was still in the process of gaining all his power back. To say nothing of the fact that in one of the early T.I.'s R.R. stated that his durability appeared weaker than normal. Add it all up... he was weakened and not at his normal durability and yet he still wrecked.
He regained his full strength.Then he went into the cancerverse and was weakened again.
Originally posted by Black bolt zThey never state he regained his full power not once. read what he wrote...you just state the same thing over and over. It's not how to debate.
Yes I know he was weaked in the beginning.But this is hours later in the 3rd comic that drax does this.He regained his full strength.Then he went into the cancerverse and was weakened again.
Originally posted by Black bolt zIf they stated he's at full strength that means he's at full power. He gained enough power for this tactic to not work. I mean you don't even understand what this means. I actually feel sorry for you. No joke.
They stated he became too strong for their minds.WHat more proof do you need?