Originally posted by WhiteWitchKing
So you admit that you know nothing. That's all that's need to be said you lazy bum.No, not every writer addresses these levels. But the majority of this board knows they're far above herald level. Why prove a known fact? You prove Mar-Vell is comparable to a Controller.
You're just an ignorant, lazy bum on this board that don't know neither Magus nor Mar-Vell are comparable to a Controller.
lol. Let's just ignore the fact that AM was trying to harm that guardian. Nova and Magus would turn into ashes had AM attempted to do the same. Good feat for Prime and Yat.
AO stomps him then. None of this explains how Thanos can take on AO. His attacks on AO's construct Corps would do nothing. You can't kill energy constructs. The rip him apart and AO absorbs him into his Lantern.
Hmmmm, so Hal did what to Larfleeze? And Larfleeze didn't outright kill the star of the GL books? I'm shocked! Atrocitus got a beating when AO got serious.
By you're logic when the majority of comic readers with their expansive and cumulative comic knowledge agree that AO is more powerful than Thanos, we shouldn't take theirwords for it but believe the words of the known board troll and Thanos fanboy's biased/absurd opinion? Ewwwwwww
Yeah, the Controllers. So Thanos is riping himself a new a-hole because he's afraid that AO would maul him and turn him into battery juice? Yeah, you've yet again proven nothing to put him on Larfleeze's level.
I admit my point stands tall and that you aren't basing this off of anything. Your personal vendetta makes this all laughable in my eyes. Another unsupported claim of yours I can add to the list.
There are no levels according to these writers and we've already seen on panel the gl's more effective against the Am than the combined power of the Guardians. We've also seen a Guardian die far easier than a daxamite with two attacks compared to one touch. 😂
The onus is on you to prove a controller is what you claim not on me. You not debating is only showing you have nothing. You never bring anything to the table. You are comparable to shoko imo someone who makes claims and doesn't really ever prove anything. Harmless, really.
Am was trying to kill a daxamite and yet failed yet one touch killed an all powerful guardian according to you which contradicts your asinine statements these guys are above herald level characters.
You need to prove they'd be turned to ashes not just make another unsupportable claim. Mar-vell has shown his power level and Surfer has shown his. You haven't shown anything or eve alluded to examples just one random statement to the next.
Thanos teleports and rips off his battery from him. I have already explained this to you. Thanos can't be killed by his constructs whereas Thanos can cause them permanent death. All right on panel, sport.
Hal ripped away his battery. Ha. Larf only got the advantage after Atrocitus' attention was taken off of him. Larf is just really lucky against far weaker characters than even Thanos and hasn't shown to be above them even.
If they can prove it or provide evidence then that's another story but if a debater doesn't and says majority says and treats it as a fact that's another matter altogether. your logic states in a room full of idiots that if they agree 2+2=5 then I have no choice but to accept it. You aren't good at debating at all and make it so easy to destroy what you think of as a logical point.
Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwww.
You haven't proven the controllers are that powerful and I have already mentioned a guardian killed by one touch of a weakened A, whereas he failed to kill Yat with two attacks.
Larfleeze isn't even on the Surfer's level.