Originally posted by Silent Master
Then post the proof.
answer my questions first. I explained he was clearly raising the bar of his attacks and provide examples of such. You have provided nothing. So answer my questions and provide proof or I'll except your concession as you just asking another stupid question.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
answer my questions first. I explained he was clearly raising the bar of his attacks and provide examples of such. You have provided nothing. So answer my questions and provide proof or I'll except your concession as you just asking another stupid question.
You're the one that made the claim, Which means the burden is on you.
Originally posted by Silent Master
You're the one that made the claim, Which means the burden is on you.
concession accepted then. Regardless of what you think I have or haven't done.. doesn't it bother you that you can never answer questions and look like a coward?
I already provided proof.. you aren't the foremost proof judge. Because you say I haven't provide enough means very little. The thing is, I provide proof for my case.. you haven't proved proof for your case. I know you're too scared to do so.. imagine a trial.. where one side provides proof and then the other side goes.. he didn't provide proof and then rest his case and doesn't offer any of his own.. How do you think that would go for that side? That is exactly what you're doing and always do. Yet you think you actually prove something.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
concession accepted then. Regardless of what you think I have or haven't done.. doesn't it bother you that you can never answer questions and look like a coward?I already provided proof.. you aren't the foremost proof judge. Because you say I haven't provide enough means very little. The thing is, I provide proof for my case.. you haven't proved proof for your case. I know you're too scared to do so.. imagine a trial.. where one side provides proof and then the other side goes.. he didn't provide proof and then rest his case and doesn't offer any of his own.. How do you think that would go for that side? That is exactly what you're doing and always do. Yet you think you actually prove something.
No, you provided speculation, that isn't the same thing as proof.
Do you have any actual proof?
Originally posted by Black bolt zThere's no such rule you are making this up. I won't show you anything ever you don't even know when a guy strangles another guy on panel and still want to argue it. You don't comprehend scans imo.
Show him as he uses it. And then we still have the 3 time rule.Thanos has never stopped thors hammer while thor is holding it and its coming down at it. Thor smashes it then smashes him.
Smash,Lasso,smash.Simple.
Thanos stopped a hammer toss with the wave of his hand. Hammer tosses do far more damage than hammer bashes.
Shields.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
In fact, as soon as he calls on it.. he says.. your doom is assured.
These are the kind of LIES that Thanosi and Quan regularly tell in their attempts to make Thanos appear to better than what he truly is; they know exactly what happened in the comic, but make a small alteration like this when talking about it in their attempts to "support" their boyfriend...
He has pulled this kind of crap several times before and I have no doubt that he will again; he's got a history of it...
Oh, and just for the sake of proving you wrong Thanosi, he make that comment several pages before summoning Gungnir to his hand...
Owned.
💃
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderMeaning he pulled it out despite his previous attempts at killing him failed so he increased his attacks with gungir.
These are the kind of LIES that Thanosi and Quan regularly tell in their attempts to make Thanos appear to better than what he truly is; they know exactly what happened in the comic, but make a small alteration like this when talking about it in their attempts to "support" their boyfriend...He has pulled this kind of crap several times before and I have no doubt that he will again; he's got a history of it...
Oh, and just for the sake of proving you wrong Thanosi, he make that comment several pages before summoning Gungnir to his hand...
Owned.
💃
Originally posted by quanchi112
Meaning he pulled it out despite his previous attempts at killing him failed so he increased his attacks with gungir.
Quan logic:
Judge: Let me get this straight. You want me to believe that Odin was trying to kill Thanos, yet (for seven panels) he made no action against him after bringing him to his knees, and allowed Thanos to get back to his feet!??
Quanchi: Yes your honor..that is exactly what I am saying.
Judge: Case dismissed!! Get this fool out of my courtroom before I have him arrested for with the charge being rampant stupidity!!
Owned.
💃
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderBecause at this point he earned his respect as an opponent and due to this he gave him a chance to yield. All right in the comic.
Quan logic:Judge: Let me get this straight. You want me to believe that Odin was trying to kill Thanos, yet (for seven panels) he made no action against him after bringing him to his knees, and allowed Thanos to get back to his feet!??
Quanchi: Yes your honor..that is exactly what I am saying.
Judge: Case dismissed!! Get this fool out of my courtroom before I have him arrested for with the charge being rampant stupidity!!
Owned.
💃
Originally posted by Silent Master
No, you provided speculation, that isn't the same thing as proof.Do you have any actual proof?
You proved nothing.. speculation.. nothing.. because you have nothing on your side that supports your points of view. If you do, please provide any proof that Odin wasn't raising the stakes... or how about you answer me these questions..
1. Why did Odin's first blast not even budge Thanos at all or do a thing to him... yet subsequent blasts backed up Thanos or straight knocked him down? Why is that if Odin never amped his blast or raised the stakes? Why would one not move him at all.. yet others send him flying? I know the answer which IS PROOF and COMMON SENSE. Odin was raising the stakes. You see little guy.. the writer doesn't come out after each blast and have the characters go... that blast was move powerful than the last one.. or that blast was weaker than the last one.. He doesn't think people are as slow as you and use common sense. So then, please answer the question..why would that be?
2. Why would Odin bring out his spear if he wasn't raising the stakes at all or if it didn't help him inflict more damage. Why would he do that if it does nothing for him? I know.. because it actually does.. again this is common sense.. something you clearly lack.
Owned yet again Silent Disaster. Maybe next time you've stop asking me stupid questions.
Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Quan logic:Judge: Let me get this straight. You want me to believe that Odin was trying to kill Thanos, yet (for seven panels) he made no action against him after bringing him to his knees, and allowed Thanos to get back to his feet!??
Quanchi: Yes your honor..that is exactly what I am saying.
Judge: Case dismissed!! Get this fool out of my courtroom before I have him arrested for with the charge being rampant stupidity!!
Owned.
💃
Thanos was on his knees for 7 panels... scans please. Ooo wait you're full of shit as usual.. Lord of Blunder.
OWNED
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
You proved nothing.. speculation.. nothing.. because you have nothing on your side that supports your points of view. If you do, please provide any proof that Odin wasn't raising the stakes... or how about you answer me these questions..1. Why did Odin's first blast not even budge Thanos at all or do a thing to him... yet subsequent blasts backed up Thanos or straight knocked him down? Why is that if Odin never amped his blast or raised the stakes? Why would one not move him at all.. yet others send him flying? I know the answer which IS PROOF and COMMON SENSE. Odin was raising the stakes. You see little guy.. the writer doesn't come out after each blast and have the characters go... that blast was move powerful than the last one.. or that blast was weaker than the last one.. He doesn't think people are as slow as you and use common sense. So then, please answer the question..why would that be?
2. Why would Odin bring out his spear if he wasn't raising the stakes at all or if it didn't help him inflict more damage. Why would he do that if it does nothing for him? I know.. because it actually does.. again this is common sense.. something you clearly lack.
Owned yet again Silent Disaster. Maybe next time you've stop asking me stupid questions.
You made the claim, that means you have to prove it and so far you haven't posted any proof.
Your justification is BS and you know it...
It makes no sense for Odin to spend the entire comicbook trying to kill Thanos, and when he finally gets him into a position to kill Thanos (during those 7 panels of just standing close by Thanos, he could have driven Gungnir through the back of Thanos's neck and killed him), relent and allow him to live...
It makes no sense and it shows the level of your fanboyism to even suggest something so stupid...
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderThat's speculation he could have killed him there and this is exactly how it went. You can't accept it that's on you.
Your justification is BS and you know it...It makes no sense for Odin to spend the entire comicbook trying to kill Thanos, and when he finally gets him into a position to kill Thanos (during those 7 panels of just standing close by Thanos, he could have driven Gungnir through the back of Thanos's neck and killed him), relent and allow him to live...
It makes no sense and it shows the level of your fanboyism to even suggest something so stupid...