Originally posted by quanchi112Its right there in what I posted. But says "as a general rule"...
Where is this stated in the rules ?I can when I cite proof. It's not on every poster to post scans in every debate. You don't know enough either way.
Tech is where his abilities are just like Iron Man besides his natural powers.
So show it. I know he has tanked surfer blasts. Show him tanking hits from thor.
Tech is tech.Abilities are innate.
Originally posted by Black bolt zThat's a pm.
Its right there in what I posted. But says "as a general rule"...So show it. I know he has tanked surfer blasts. Show him tanking hits from thor.
Tech is tech.Abilities are innate.
I don't post scans for you you argue against them anyways so it's a waste of energy.
So ironman has no abilities ? LOL.
Originally posted by quanchi112Of me asking a mod a question about the rules and him answering.
That's a pm.I don't post scans for you you argue against them anyways so it's a waste of energy.
So ironman has no abilities ? LOL.
If you show thanos tanking a hit from thor what is there to argue against? You can't dispute on-panel proof.
The iron man armor is tech. All his powers are tech.
Originally posted by Black bolt zIt wasn't a rule he just gave a vague answer back. if he shows up says it's a rule then I will concede the point.
Of me asking a mod a question about the rules and him answering.If you show thanos tanking a hit from thor what is there to argue against? You can't dispute on-panel proof.
The iron man armor is tech. All his powers are tech.
You already have when I posted proof before.
That means it's one of his abilities.
Originally posted by Black bolt z
Its right there in what I posted. But says "as a general rule"...So show it. I know he has tanked surfer blasts. Show him tanking hits from thor.
Tech is tech.Abilities are innate.
Sure
Thor's thunder blast hurts Mangog here: http://img141.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc24&image=90efd_thormangog.jpg
Thor uses the same attack on Thanos here and Thanos is virtually unphased and doesn't even flinch: http://img103.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc24&image=ae3c9_thor.jpg
*edit: Thor is even repeatedly shooting THanos and even comments that Thanos isn't even phased "By the thousand threats of Ragnarok--he falleth not!"
Originally posted by vince_sliceThats what I said hammers. Thats why I said thanos has never tanked thor hammer.
SureThor's thunder blast hurts Mangog here: http://img141.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc24&image=90efd_thormangog.jpg
Thor uses the same attack on Thanos here and Thanos is virtually unphased and doesn't even flinch: http://img103.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc24&image=ae3c9_thor.jpg
*edit: Thor is even repeatedly shooting THanos and even comments that Thanos isn't even phased "By the thousand threats of Ragnarok--he falleth not!"
Originally posted by Black bolt z
Thats what I said hammers. Thats why I said thanos has never tanked thor hammer.
If Thor's blasts don't even phase Thanos we can infer that his hammer shots are unlikely to phase him either, otherwise he would of used melee instead of run.
Not every attack on Thanos has to be shown on panel to prove he can resist it. It goes down a slippery slope, next thing you know you'll demand me showing scans of Thanos resisting sharp objects, then fire, then ice, then magical attacks, then punches, then punches with fire and magical lightning ice, and etc.
Show me a scan of Odin being unphased by Wolverine's adamantium claws? Probably hasn't been shown on panel, but it doesn't need to cause we know Odin wouldn't be hurt because he can tank shots from herald's like nothing.
Originally posted by vince_sliceBut we've also seen thor's physical attacks stagger thanos. Not saying it will do much damage but thanos is not tanking his physical attacks. Energy blasts is what thanos specializes in.
If Thor's blasts don't even phase Thanos we can infer that his hammer shots are unlikely to phase him either, otherwise he would of used melee instead of run.Not every attack on Thanos has to be shown on panel to prove he can resist it. It goes down a slippery slope, next thing you know you'll demand me showing scans of Thanos resisting sharp objects, then fire, then ice, then magical attacks, then punches, then punches with fire and magical lightning ice, and etc.
Show me a scan of Odin being unphased by Wolverine's adamantium claws? Probably hasn't been shown on panel, but it doesn't need to cause we know Odin wouldn't be hurt because he can tank shots from herald's like nothing.
Originally posted by vince_slice
If Thor's blasts don't even phase Thanos we can infer that his hammer shots are unlikely to phase him either, otherwise he would of used melee instead of run.Not every attack on Thanos has to be shown on panel to prove he can resist it. It goes down a slippery slope, next thing you know you'll demand me showing scans of Thanos resisting sharp objects, then fire, then ice, then magical attacks, then punches, then punches with fire and magical lightning ice, and etc.
Show me a scan of Odin being unphased by Wolverine's adamantium claws? Probably hasn't been shown on panel, but it doesn't need to cause we know Odin wouldn't be hurt because he can tank shots from herald's like nothing.
Using that logic, anyone that Cyclops can hurt with his blasts, he can hurt with his fists.
Originally posted by Black bolt z
But we've also seen thor's physical attacks stagger thanos. Not saying it will do much damage but thanos is not tanking his physical attacks. Energy blasts is what thanos specializes in.
The problem with that is it assumes the premise of Thanos being specialized in tanking only energy attacks. It also assumes there's a huge difference between the damage that energy attacks do and physical attacks do. They are different, but is the difference big enough to make a difference? I highly doubt that.
Regardless, Thanos has tanked Thor's physical hits before, in fact he's tanked warrior madness Thor with the power gem, and at best got a nose bleed.
I don't think anyone will argue that regular Thor's physical attacks > warrior madness Thor with the power gem.
Originally posted by vince_slicehmm.. i was with you for a while till you made the piercing and Blunt damage, energy damage equal when in comics that is hardly if ever the case.
If Thor's blasts don't even phase Thanos we can infer that his hammer shots are unlikely to phase him either, otherwise he would of used melee instead of run.Not every attack on Thanos has to be shown on panel to prove he can resist it. It goes down a slippery slope, next thing you know you'll demand me showing scans of Thanos resisting sharp objects, then fire, then ice, then magical attacks, then punches, then punches with fire and magical lightning ice, and etc.
Show me a scan of Odin being unphased by Wolverine's adamantium claws? Probably hasn't been shown on panel, but it doesn't need to cause we know Odin wouldn't be hurt because he can tank shots from herald's like nothing.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Using that logic, anyone that Cyclops can hurt with his blasts, he can hurt with his fists.
No the difference is we know Cyclop's energy blasts are much greater than his physical traits.
Thor on the other hand is formidable both in energy attacks and physical attacks, so it's much harder to compare it.
Originally posted by King Castle
hmm.. i was with you for a while till you made the piercing and Blunt damage, energy damage equal when in comics that is hardly if ever the case.
I don't think they're equal, they're different. But I don't think they're different enough to make that much of a difference against Thanos. Also I didn't mean for it to look like I thought blunt and piercing are similar. I used the wolverine example just to show that we don't need a scan of Odin tanking his claws to know he won't be affected by it. Piercing and blunt are different of course. What I'm arguing is energy or concussive blasts and physical attacks aren't as different.
Originally posted by vince_slice
No the difference is we know Cyclop's energy blasts are much greater than his physical traits.Thor on the other hand is formidable both in energy attacks and physical attacks, so it's much harder to compare it.
You mean, like we know that Thor's physical attacks can stagger Thanos when some of his energy attacks didn't?
Originally posted by Silent Master
You mean, like we know that Thor's physical attacks can stagger Thanos when some of his energy attacks didn't?
I already mentioned Thanos tanking shots from warrior madness Thor with the power gem and only getting a nose bleed. This is an example of Thanos tanking a much more powerful Thor physically.
Do you think regular Thor is physically stronger than warrior madness Thor with the power gem?
Originally posted by Silent Master
He didn't tank them, he got busted open and then ran for a weapon.BTW, it wasn't real warrior madness.
Busted open? He had a small droplet of blood coming from his nose, after exchanging multiple blows with Thor. That's not busted open.
Ran? He said "I tire of this" and casually walked away, not ran. Seriously is your vision that skewed?
Not real warrior madness? That's a bold claim, please prove it. Are you also going to argue the power gem makes no difference either?
Originally posted by Silent Master
Odin himself said it wasn't true warrior madnes in the story, it was a mental breakdown caused by Odin tampering with Thor's mind.I may have used a little hyperbole, but yes, Thor made Thanos bleed and rather than continue he went and got a weapon to contain Thor.
Can you post me the scan? Can you also show me that him being in this supposedly "fake" warrior madness doesn't make him stronger in any way?
lol, a little hyperbole? You exaggerated quite a lot. Doesn't matter if he went to get a weapon. Thanos still demonstrated that he can tank a much stronger Thor's physical attacks.
Answer me this: Do you think regular Thor is as strong as warrior madness Thor with the power gem?
