Link & Sora vs Sonic and Ventus

Dissidia is not canon.
It is in fact a direct sequel to FF1, but Square themselves said that it was non canon.

I DID read, but simply reading your words doesn't make them true.
Your explanation makes no sense, and it contradicts itself, so it's moot.

Originally posted by MadMel
Dissidia is not canon.
It is in fact a direct sequel to FF1, but Square themselves said that it was non canon.

I DID read, but simply reading your words doesn't make them true.
Your explanation makes no sense, and it contradicts itself, so it's moot.

Its got to be Canon since its a FF game and they all return to there worlds.

the contradictory part was that you said that SCII has a story, wheras ssb is just a beatemup.
sc2 is 'just' a fighter.
and ssb also has a story, albeit a story akin to that of a silent movie.

That part that doesn't make sense is when you said sc2 link is canon just because he has a story. so?
Canon is based on what games the character's are in, not how the characters are presented in those games.

And no. If Square say Dissidia is not canon, it's not canon.
If it were canon, it would bring up quite a few plot holes and retcon a good portion of the original FF1.

Originally posted by MadMel
the contradictory part was that you said that SCII has a story, wheras ssb is just a beatemup.
sc2 is 'just' a fighter.
and ssb also has a story, albeit a story akin to that of a silent movie.

That part that doesn't make sense is when you said sc2 link is canon just because he has a story. so?
Canon is based on what games the character's are in, not how the characters are presented in those games.

And no. If Square say Dissidia is not canon, it's not canon.
If it were canon, it would bring up quite a few plot holes and retcon a good portion of the original FF1.

Wouldn't Dissidia be classed as a canon because i thought the timeline on all of the final fantasy's was:

FFI - Dissidia FF
FFII - Dissidia FF
FFIII - Dissidia FF
FFIV - Dissidia FF - FFIV:TAY
FFV - Dissidia FF - FF:LotC
FFVI - Dissidia FF
BCFFVII - CCFFVII - FFVII - FFT - Dissidia FF - Novellas - FFACC
FFVIII - Dissidia FF
FFIX - Dissidia FF
FFX - Dissidia FF - FFX-2

It's like saying AC and FFV is non-canon because its a movie not a game. All well I still considered them as my personal canons except for SSB.

Star Wars Expanded Universe and how their canon works - they'll count anything as canon!

That said, acording to Wookipedia it is actually listed as non-canonical - but, there was a comic produces that tied into the game that was presented under the Infinities banner, which covers alternate universe takes on Star Wars (like Marvel comics old What If? series), so it's actually canonically non-canonical, if that makes sense.

Just because it's silent doesn't mean it doesn't have a story.

I for one liked the change of pace from the usual talking.
And it made plenty of sense.

Originally posted by MadMel
And no. If Square say Dissidia is not canon, it's not canon.

Originally posted by MadMel
Just because it's silent doesn't mean it doesn't have a story.

I for one liked the change of pace from the usual talking.
And it made plenty of sense.

DBGT more so because -
1. Akira had very little to do with its creation.
2. Dragon Ball Online (the story of which was written by Toriyama and IS canon) retcons everything from DBGT. 😛

Originally posted by MadMel
DBGT more so because -
1. Akira had very little to do with its creation.
2. Dragon Ball Online (the story of which was written by Toriyama and IS canon) retcons everything from DBGT. 😛

Another reason I call it a canon because its actually Link who travel's to Earth then he returns to Hyrule, that's another reason why it makes sense cause it instead of just mentioning there background story like on KH when you go on the database it tell's you of what film or game there from, it is actually for real. Same goes for Dissidia and the reason for FF1 because you have to create your character and has no default so it makes me think the warrior of light is default and the only hero because on the intro it shows him aswell on the psone version. Doesn't really say how many heroe's there meant to be even though you can create up to 4 and customize there class. I have no idea this makes sense or not, because I'm so tired.

Originally posted by MadMel
Canon is based on what games the character's are in, not how the characters are presented in those games.

Originally posted by MadMel

Originally posted by Remi8193
But with other games and media they count as other crossovers as canon's such as Star Wars (anything is Canon for them)

Originally posted by Remi8193
Tekken (Heihachi was in SC2), Lloyd Irving from Tales of Symphonia(SC:L), Spawn, GOW (Kratos is in MK9 and SCIV😛SP)

Originally posted by Remi8193
they also said its possible for Link to be Canon even though its Canon for the SC2. Actually I think SC is the only game that counts Guests as Canon's even if its a exclusive.

Originally posted by Remi8193
It says it non-canon on dragonball.wikia.com

soulcalibur.wikia.com/wiki/Soulcalibur_Wiki
www.soulpedia.net
aselia.wikia.com/
tekken.wikia.com
www.tekkenpedia.net
Mortalkombat.wikia.com
Godofwar.wikia.com
That's all the pages I went to

Oh look, more websites that can be edited by anyone! 🙄

For all I know you could have changed those websites yourself so that they display that information. It wouldn't surprise me. I've known people to make multiple accounts and edit wiki articles just to insult people.

Originally posted by MadMel
Oh look, more websites that can be edited by anyone! 🙄

For all I know you could have changed those websites yourself so that they display that information. It wouldn't surprise me. I've known people to make multiple accounts and edit wiki articles just to insult people.

Meh, it doesn't really matter. If Link is cannon in SC2, it isn't cannon for the game he originally came from. Miyamoto never sent OoT Link to another game... unless u count MM 😐