Originally posted by Rez
The reigning happened in an alternate timeline,it did not happen in 616
🙂
It happened in 616 until King Thor went back in time and told his present self not to abandon his humanity, creating the divergent time line.
Regardless, King Thor specifically refers to that Thor from that arc. 🙂
Originally posted by JakeTheBank
It happened in 616 until King Thor went back in time and told his present self not to abandon his humanity, creating the divergent time line.Regardless, King Thor specifically refers to that Thor from that arc. 🙂
King Thor from earth 3515 travelled back in time to prevent the killing of jake olson that caused Lord Thors fall from grace.But 616 thor removed asgard from earth preventing those events happening in that timeline.
Originally posted by JakeTheBank
It happened in 616 until King Thor went back in time and told his present self not to abandon his humanity, creating the divergent time line.Regardless, King Thor specifically refers to that Thor from that arc. 🙂
here is the funny part the prologue for The Reigning starts at issue 68
the story is set in the year 2020.yet if we back up a bit to Thor issue 59 "Missing" see,s Thor fighting on the day of ragnarok he is then separated from his hammer for more than 60 seconds,Next thing you know its the year 2026 and Thor in his Human form trying to convince people he is not a crazy old man,issue 59 kinda contradicts the validity of your claim. 📖 issue 60 "spiral part 1" starts in yet another timeline.we have 3 timelines conflicting here,and i have not even mentioned how it contradicts other characters future timelines. 📖
Originally posted by TheHulkRecently? Because the alternative is that you knew that King Thor does not need to use his fists to fight and still for some reason think he does...
I did read Up In King Thpr thank you very much....ahhh whats the point its IMPOSSIBLE to reason with you.
and I wasnt aware of any attempts by your part to reason. The totality of your posts on here equaled= hulk wins, I dont know why or how but he does.
Originally posted by DamborgsonWhatever you say Damborgy He does have powerful eye beams that only melted Capt America and Wolverine(expect his hair) anyone else I'm missing???
Recently? Because the alternative is that you knew that King Thor does not need to use his fists to fight and still for some reason think he does...and I wasnt aware of any attempts by your part to reason. The totality of your posts on here equaled= hulk wins, I dont know why or how but he does.
Originally posted by TheHulkYou got the eyebeams down. There are 2 more showings but they dont really matter. What i'm saying is that that is only a fraction of what KT is capable of without Mjolnir. Go to page 2. Theres some stuff on him there.
Please name a few I don't care about his eye beams so I remember only a few things about it...
Originally posted by DamborgsonFine but let's take it onto a fist fight,Okay WWH can go either way but King Thor has the favor in the fight,but WB Hulk he would win...
You got the eyebeams down. There are 2 more showings but they dont really matter. What i'm saying is that that is only a fraction of what KT is capable of without Mjolnir. Go to page 2. Theres some stuff on him there.
Originally posted by DamborgsonI know the OP I'm just saying...you know what forget and yes Zeus i remember....their are so many reasons sons why Zeus thrash hulk that I won't even bother spilling...I think Rex can do that for me...
Read the OP. I didnt say fist fight. And theres a certain skyfather who beat the hell out of hulk a while back with his fists.