"Female paedophile" should the term even exist?

Started by Rogue Jedi5 pages

Something happen to you, or someone you know?

No. I just really don't like it.

Neither do I, but you REALLY don't like it.

RJ trying to glean stories so he can masturbate, again.

Obviously.

It makes me physically ill. My guy clenches up and I start to shake. It distresses me more than anything I've ever experienced.

I guess i'm kind of odd. 0_0

Does it make your butt-hole pucker? Cos that's a solid indicator.

Oh yes. Like a vice. I could cut lemons in half when that thing gets going.

Every time I watch Zed plowing into Marcellus Wallace I shudder.

In ecstasy?

Originally posted by Mairuzu
lulz to this one

Ugh. That made me a bit sick. 😘 😘 😘 😘 😘

Originally posted by Nephthys
😐

The whole point of pedophilia is that you cannot want it. You are too young to give complete consent to it. You are too young to understand the implications of it. You are too young to handle to the responsibilities that may arise because of it and you are much too young to handle the psychological impact from it.

I hope you are joking because pedophilia [b]is rape and it would be truely sickening to seriously advocate it. If you are joking then more power too you, keep up the lulz.

😐 [/B]

I consider that not to be true for half of the "kids" out there. There are lots of young people that don't really know but I certainly knew and wanted it from a hot chick from a young age. I don't really know any better now than I did then. The difference is I have much better self control.

That entire statement is retarded as a blanket statement, A 17 year old girl having sex with a 20 year old man is considered rape. Anyone with a brain can realize that the mindset of a 17 year old girl and an 18 year old is not radically different. I would even argue that that applies to all people ranging from ages 16-20. It's not like there's some kind of "on" switch that mentally switches when you turn 18, making you responsible and smart.

technically 16 is the average mental age of most adults.. so it wouldnt be that big of a deal or at least shouldnt if we are trying to argue mental competence as a reason to consider some one of rape statutory speaking f course.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Then it's not rape. lulz

http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&safe=off&q=female+pedophiles&bav=on.2,or.&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&biw=960&bih=503


Laura Prepon. She could rape me.
I wouldnt give two ****s.

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
In ecstasy?
Nah, quite the opposite.

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
That entire statement is retarded as a blanket statement, A 17 year old girl having sex with a 20 year old man is considered rape. Anyone with a brain can realize that the mindset of a 17 year old girl and an 18 year old is not radically different. I would even argue that that applies to all people ranging from ages 16-20. It's not like there's some kind of "on" switch that mentally switches when you turn 18, making you responsible and smart.

lol.

Funny you should mention it. There was a dude that made a similar complaint about insurance rates. He said stuff like, "Do I magically get better at driving when I get married or turn 25?"

But, yeah, I agree. I would say that a female at 15 is more socially developed than a male at 21. If I'm not mistaken, the science backs me up. I believe it takes a man until 24-25 to reach the same "level" as a 15-16 year old girl.

I don't feel like looking up shit as it would take forever but if I'm off, I'm only off by a year.

My point is, there's no magic switch. Everyone is an individual. There's not blanket statements that can work. You would not a mentally retarded girl at 25 having sex with a normal 18-year old dude, probably...ever?

You look up at shit?

Originally posted by mikeydude
I'm fine if a woman over the age of 18 rapes me.
It's almost happened once. True story.

When I was in high school there was this chick who was known for being a complete nympho. So apparently she 'raped' some guy when he was ridiculously stoned. He wanted to save himself or whatever.

Don't remember the exact story, probably is only half true anyway, if that.

First off I was a fully willing victim of this as a youth. The details are not important. At the time I thought nothing was wrong with it. Today I have a different opinion. I will ask the question a different way. If it was done to your son would it be wrong?

If you say no then you are not even close to being mature enough to be a parent.

At last someone with an actual brain.

Originally posted by Slay
When I was in high school there was this chick who was known for being a complete nympho. So apparently she 'raped' some guy when he was ridiculously stoned. He wanted to save himself or whatever.

Don't remember the exact story, probably is only half true anyway, if that.

**** off dickface. That is rape. She completely took advantage of him in every sense of the word.

That entire statement is retarded as a blanket statement, A 17 year old girl having sex with a 20 year old man is considered rape. Anyone with a brain can realize that the mindset of a 17 year old girl and an 18 year old is not radically different. I would even argue that that applies to all people ranging from ages 16-20. It's not like there's some kind of "on" switch that mentally switches when you turn 18, making you responsible and smart.

Well no shit Blax. Obviously people don't mature at the exact same rate. I assumed that was so retardedly obvious that I didn't have to mention it. I also thought it was retardedly obvious that that doesn't matter. We cannot deal with every criminal case on an individual basis. The age of consent is the average age the country or state believes that a person is ready and mature enough to actually give consent. That is how the law works. We cannot say, 'well he is under the age of consent, but he's a really smart kid, so we'll just sweep this one under the rug, lol', or 'well she's techically underage, bt only by a few months, so whatevs!.' That would be stupid. That is why legally it is classified as rape, and will always be classified as rape, regardless of whether you think it's 'fair' or not. Now obviously there is some leeway involved, as with any crime, which is why we have different senteces etc, but if that 20 year old guy slept with her knowing that she was underage then he willingly broke the law. He gets what he deserves.