"Female paedophile" should the term even exist?

Originally posted by StarCraft2
well I know the story of Sarah Jane Salazar. (googled)

She was a 19 year old prostitute who had sex with a 16 year old boy. While she was working as a prostitute, she got infected with HIV and also infecting that 16 year old boy. She was charged for child sexual abuse. She also had a child with that 16 year old boy. Sarah Jane died in 2000 at age 25. her child/children have no HIV symptoms since Sarah Jane was on antivirals.

I would count this as female paedophile

And I would not on the grounds you being factually wrong.

Originally posted by dadudemon
And I would not on the grounds you being factually wrong.

i didnt understand

thank you

Paranutz.

Originally posted by StarCraft2
paraphrase please

i didnt understand

thank you

What?

crylaugh

paraphrase your sentence please, because I didnt understand what you mean. Thank you

Originally posted by StarCraft2
paraphrase your sentence please, because I didnt understand what you mean. Thank you

It is not pedophilia: you are wrong.

well by law its pedophilia since having sex with a minor is considered pedophilia...If i am wrong then...

is it 13 below? 12?

Originally posted by StarCraft2
well by law its pedophilia since having sex with a minor is considered pedophilia...If i am wrong then...

is it 13 below? 12?

No, that would be statutory rape, not pedophilia. I read, no where, in the US, in which statutory rape is classified as pedophilia.

Also, in some states, 4 or less years difference in age is no prosecutable. In other states, if one is 16 and the other is less than 21, it's not a crime. WHat you meant to say was: "I do not like the fact that there was a 3 or 4 year difference in age between the two people."

In all instances, it's not pedophilia, at all: neither that man nor that woman were prepubescent. You should know this, as a nurse.

There are actually separate laws that address pedophilia. Usually below 14, but some under 12. It is not sex with a minor/statitory rape, at that point. It is carnal knowledge of a child, child molestation, and things like that.

Yah, it would be Ephebophilia, not pedophilia. Also its status as statuatory rape is only applicable in certain states/countries.

well I dont know much about laws and its technicalities. I dont have criminology.

I am a health care provider I just push meds to them patients and let doctor know whats going on with the pt.
My criminology and my vocabulary on criminal stuff is limited to almost equivalent to ignorance as you can see on my post above. So im getting lessons from you people.

I just learned something new, yeah?

Originally posted by Nephthys
Yah, it would be Ephebophilia, not pedophilia. Also its status as statuatory rape is only applicable in certain states/countries.

No it wouldn't. Ephebophilia requires that they have started puberty and not finished. That's the 10-13 range for the most part. This is why the age of consent is sometimes at 16 instead of just 18. Not all laws are dumb.

Originally posted by dadudemon
What?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
crylaugh

Originally posted by dadudemon
No it wouldn't. Ephebophilia requires that they have started puberty and not finished. That's the 10-13 range for the most part. This is why the age of consent is sometimes at 16 instead of just 18. Not all laws are dumb.

I don't think you finish puberty at 13, it's more like 18. Puberty in males takes like 5 or 6 years mostly.

When I was young about 13 or so, I fancied one of the teaching assistants. She was gorgeous and wore short skirts often.
First thing I did each day after getting home from school was masturbate having lots of fantasies about her.
I wish I had got to make sexy time with her, but no such luck sadly