Theoretical feats contest

Started by Philosophía11 pages

Theoretical feats contest

What feats would a character have to do, at bare minimum, baring direct comparisons (and also, assume they're from different companies, so ABC comparisons don't exist either), in order to think him as:

a). Being stronger than Thor.
b). Being stronger than Thanos.
c). Being fast enough to speedblitz Silver Surfer to a knockout, before Silver Surfer'd be able to mount any kind of counter-attack/defense.
d). Being fast enough to speedblitz Thor to a knockout, before Thor'd be able to mount any kind of counter-attack/defense.
e). Being fast enough to speedblitz Thanos to a knockout, before Thanos'd be able to mount any kind of counter-attack/defense.

Re: Theoretical feats contest

Originally posted by Philosophía
What feats would a character have to do, at bare minimum, baring direct comparisons (and also, assume they're from different companies, so ABC comparisons don't exist either), in order to think him as:

a). Being stronger than Thor.
b). Being stronger than Thanos.
c). Being fast enough to speedblitz Silver Surfer to a knockout, before Silver Surfer'd be able to mount any kind of counter-attack/defense.
d). Being fast enough to speedblitz Thor to a knockout, before Thor'd be able to mount any kind of counter-attack/defense.
e). Being fast enough to speedblitz Thanos to a knockout, before Thanos'd be able to mount any kind of counter-attack/defense.


a. Any being Superman's level or close is Stronger than Thor.
b. Thanos has no strength feats I can think of. He's likely twice as strong as Hulk.
c. No one is fast enough to blitz Surfer to a KO under trans. Flash maybe if he does a whole lot of imps.
d. Thor isn't that fast. Anyone who can approach light speed and combat maneuver will be able to KO thor if they are at least as strong as the Base Hulk.
e. No one but Zoom.

Re: Re: Theoretical feats contest

Originally posted by She-Ra-La

b. Thanos has no strength feats I can think of. He's likely twice as strong as Hulk.
That doesn't mean anything.

I'd rather you not use characters, but instead use quantifiable feats, otherwise this thread will derail into Marvel vs DC.

For the speed part, assume the character has adequate strength - as in he'd be able to knock Surfer/Thor/Thanos out in under 10-15 attacks - and the question is soley speed related.

Originally posted by Philosophía
otherwise this thread will derail into Marvel vs DC.
Doesn't it always?

Originally posted by Philosophía
What feats would a character have to do, at bare minimum, baring direct comparisons (and also, assume they're from different companies, so ABC comparisons don't exist either), in order to think him as:

a). Being stronger than Thor.
b). Being stronger than Thanos.
c). Being fast enough to speedblitz Silver Surfer to a knockout, before Silver Surfer'd be able to mount any kind of counter-attack/defense.
d). Being fast enough to speedblitz Thor to a knockout, before Thor'd be able to mount any kind of counter-attack/defense.
e). Being fast enough to speedblitz Thanos to a knockout, before Thanos'd be able to mount any kind of counter-attack/defense.

Simply put: the character in question would need to have Superman-level feats.

Re: Theoretical feats contest

Originally posted by Philosophía
What feats would a character have to do, at bare minimum, baring direct comparisons (and also, assume they're from different companies, so ABC comparisons don't exist either), in order to think him as:

a). Being stronger than Thor.
b). Being stronger than Thanos.
c). Being fast enough to speedblitz Silver Surfer to a knockout, before Silver Surfer'd be able to mount any kind of counter-attack/defense.
d). Being fast enough to speedblitz Thor to a knockout, before Thor'd be able to mount any kind of counter-attack/defense.
e). Being fast enough to speedblitz Thanos to a knockout, before Thanos'd be able to mount any kind of counter-attack/defense.

from what I've seen on these forums, there is nowhere near a general consensus on any of the powers you have listed there.

iirc, there have been dozens of pages of debate about, for instance, Thor's strength

Re: Re: Theoretical feats contest

Originally posted by inimalist

iirc, there have been dozens of pages of debate about, for instance, Thor's strength

just dozens?

Re: Re: Theoretical feats contest

Originally posted by She-Ra-La
a. Any being Superman's level or close is Stronger than Thor.
b. Thanos has no strength feats I can think of. He's likely twice as strong as Hulk.
c. No one is fast enough to blitz Surfer to a KO under trans. Flash maybe if he does a whole lot of imps.
d. Thor isn't that fast. Anyone who can approach light speed and combat maneuver will be able to KO thor if they are at least as strong as the Base Hulk.
e. No one but Zoom.

I agree with this

Re: Re: Re: Theoretical feats contest

Originally posted by PillarofOsiris
just dozens?

well, that I've bothered to spend time reading 😉

Originally posted by Galan007
Simply put: the character in question would need to have Superman-level feats.
superman prime, you mean

Re: Re: Re: Theoretical feats contest

Originally posted by PillarofOsiris
just dozens?
Thousands of dozens.

Originally posted by inimalist
from what I've seen on these forums, there is nowhere near a general consensus on any of the powers you have listed there.

iirc, there have been dozens of pages of debate about, for instance, Thor's strength

I don't care for you to debate it, I'm asking for personal opinions, not consesus, on quantifiable feats that, in your opinion, would make that character capable of what I've enumerated.

Originally posted by Galan007
Simply put: the character in question would need to have Superman-level feats.
*insert epic explosion pic*

ha-som
Look at what your presence is attracting twoards Gotham:

Originally posted by 753
superman prime, you mean

Originally posted by Silent Master
You mean feats equal to a Superman w/GL ring, power gem, Norn-stones and a personality.

💃

Seriously people, focus on what the thread is asking.

Originally posted by Galan007
Simply put: the character in question would need to have Superman-level feats.

You mean feats equal to a Superman w/GL ring, power gem, Norn-stones and a personality.

💃

Re: Re: Theoretical feats contest

Originally posted by She-Ra-La
a. Any being Superman's level or close is Stronger than Thor.

The strength ones are iffy and the speed even moreso considering comics have very inconsistent ways of dealing with speed.

But barring direct comparisons I'd say moving or one shotting a planet of Earth mass or greater with strength alone would certainly put you above Thor.

a). Being stronger than Thor.

Pushing a planet? Cause I'm pretty sure Thor fans would come up with the midgard snake feat. My opinion would be different though cause that's not Thor's "avarage" showing but there the problems start.

Originally posted by Parmaniac
a). Being stronger than Thor.

Pushing a planet? Cause I'm pretty sure Thor fans would come up with the midgard snake feat. My opinion would be different though cause that's not Thor's "avarage" showing but there the problems start.


Wasn't the Serpent stated as "only" being 1/2 the mass of Earth?

Why would one shotting or moving a planet put you above Thor?

There is no quantifiable feat that a character can do that would place them above Thor strength wise in of itself. Same goes for Hulk, Superman and every other elite top tier strength wise because if need be, a writer can have said characters doing high end unquantifiable feats.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Wasn't the Serpent stated as "only" being 1/2 the mass of Earth?
IDK, then you can argue it was wrapping itself around the planet, usimg muscles etc. etc..