Originally posted by zopzop
Here are the scans :
Look at the difference in power and scope of the attacks. Necrom was an awesome wielder of the PF. Keep in mind she had waaaaay more of it than he did, he was only channeling a sliver of the power and he could only access it when she called upon the Phoenix and yet he was owning her.
In theory she could do everything that he could and then some, but in practice she's never even come close. She's an idiot.
So back on topic : Maxima's feats > Rachel's feats. Maxima's foes > Rachel's foes. Maxima 10/10.
it doesn't MATTER that necrom seemed more proficient. you keep bringing it up but i don't know why. we're talking about rachel.
we'll agree to disagree then. as i said--one blast equal to what she did to the beyonder would kill max in less than a blink. the damage necrom did would have killed max early in that fight and rachel was still fighting him evenly, if not using the same level of attacks. in that battle alone she showed durability FAR beyond anything max has EVER shown. if you disagree, feel free to show some of her durability feats. feel free to show max as being capable of doing more damage than necrom could as well, because using her at her best, that's what it would take to ko her and rachel would end it WELL before that could happen. and there is NO WAY max could take out rachel with tp. seriously? you have some kind of hate for rachel......
i would HOPE a lot less than galactus or beyonder beat her. 😐
rachel's problem was pretty simple--she was cast as a team member. it was like when ss was a defender. even thor as an avenger suffered from it at times. an uber power-being on a team is ALWAYS written below where they should be. at her best showings, rachel slaughters max 100/10. her potential and overall power>>>>max. her showings ARE inconsistent. assuming both at their best rachel kills her.
