Superman with GL Ring vs Thanos

Started by Blight31 pages

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
I understand but that isn't how we judge everyday things, and it's not the most logical way to go about it PR. For example every boxer, MMA fighter, basketball team etc etc have BAD games. It could be because they just had an off night, mentally weren't there or confident, intimidated by the opposition. We don't go.. well we'll only judge Pac based on all his exceptional fights and forget about the style matchups that posed him problems. We don't judge The Lakers based upon all the awesome games or okay games.. we also look at their poor games and why they had those games.. matchups.. styles... etc etc. They are ALL taken into consideration when judging pretty much everything in life. Why is it different here. Just because somebody has a not so good showing.. it doesn't mean we should just exclude those as if they never happened or hide behind it was CIS or PIS. Sure in some cases, I do agree, but to discount them totally.. that just seems illogical as we don't judge most things in this way.
comic characters aren't mma fighters. Sometimes they are written inconsistently bad. This isn't because they were tired or because they had an off day, its because the writer wrote it the way they did... in the flip side, when somone shows a higher feat due to anger or some other plausible thing, it actually makes sense because it is possibly within the characters powerset, but the lack of adrenaline holds them back (or mental block, tip toeing, etc.)

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
I understand but that isn't how we judge everyday things, and it's not the most logical way to go about it PR. For example every boxer, MMA fighter, basketball team etc etc have BAD games. It could be because they just had an off night, mentally weren't there or confident, intimidated by the opposition. We don't go.. well we'll only judge Pac based on all his exceptional fights and forget about the style matchups that posed him problems. We don't judge The Lakers based upon all the awesome games or okay games.. we also look at their poor games and why they had those games.. matchups.. styles... etc etc. They are ALL taken into consideration when judging pretty much everything in life. Why is it different here. Just because somebody has a not so good showing.. it doesn't mean we should just exclude those as if they never happened or hide behind it was CIS or PIS. Sure in some cases, I do agree, but to discount them totally.. that just seems illogical as we don't judge most things in this way.

I'm not even sure if hes saying they're not allowed. I think it depends there are low showings then theres PIS.

Originally posted by Blight
This isn't because they were tired or because they had an off day,

Sometimes it is actually.

Originally posted by Deadline
I'm not even sure if hes saying they're not allowed. I think it depends there are low showings then theres PIS.

Sometimes it is actually.

yes but according to stipulations, superman has just witnessed the love of his life murdered by the man he needs to defeat.

There is case a case of a woman lifting a car to save her child. Sure this isn't within her powers normally but adrenaline has allowed it. Now you won't see this same person struggle to lift a sandwich, would you? No, because that would be a real life case of pis. I think this is what pr is getting at anyway.

Originally posted by Blight
yes but according to stipulations, superman has just witnessed the love if his life murdered by the man he needs to defeat.

There is case a case of a woman lifting a car to save her child. Sure this isn't within her powers normally but adrenaline has allowed it. Now you won't see this same person struggle to lift a sandwich, would you? No, because that would be a real life case of pis. I think this is what pr is getting at anyway.

Oh yea shit. Well since Batman survived an attack from Superman who thought he killed Lois Thanos wins. 👆

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
I understand but that isn't how we judge everyday things, and it's not the most logical way to go about it PR. For example every boxer, MMA fighter, basketball team etc etc have BAD games. It could be because they just had an off night, mentally weren't there or confident, intimidated by the opposition. We don't go.. well we'll only judge Pac based on all his exceptional fights and forget about the style matchups that posed him problems. We don't judge The Lakers based upon all the awesome games or okay games.. we also look at their poor games and why they had those games.. matchups.. styles... etc etc. They are ALL taken into consideration when judging pretty much everything in life. Why is it different here. Just because somebody has a not so good showing.. it doesn't mean we should just exclude those as if they never happened or hide behind it was CIS or PIS. Sure in some cases, I do agree, but to discount them totally.. that just seems illogical as we don't judge most things in this way.

that isn't the same thing.

blight puts it well:

Originally posted by Blight
comic characters aren't mma fighters. Sometimes they are written inconsistently bad. This isn't because they were tired or because they had an off day, its because the writer wrote it the way they did... in the flip side, when somone shows a higher feat due to anger or some other plausible thing, it actually makes sense because it is possibly within the characters powerset, but the lack of adrenaline holds them back (or mental block, tip toeing, etc.)

-

Originally posted by Deadline
Oh yea shit. Well since Batman survived an attack from Superman who thought he killed Lois Thanos wins. 👆

except that Superman was fighting the mental control the entire time, which the writer backed up.

Originally posted by Blight
comic characters aren't mma fighters. Sometimes they are written inconsistently bad. This isn't because they were tired or because they had an off day, its because the writer wrote it the way they did... in the flip side, when somone shows a higher feat due to anger or some other plausible thing, it actually makes sense because it is possibly within the characters powerset, but the lack of adrenaline holds them back (or mental block, tip toeing, etc.)

That isn't logical at all... So higher feats are OKAY because they decided to let loose or something really motivated them... Yet, they can't choose the wrong strat and get beat? They can't get intimidated by a foe and not fight the way they could. You can't have it both ways and I hope you realize you're being hypocritical in your explanation.

Originally posted by -Pr-

except that Superman was fighting the mental control the entire time, which the writer backed up.

I was joking anyway.

Originally posted by -Pr-
that isn't the same thing.

blight puts it well:

-

except that Superman was fighting the mental control the entire time, which the writer backed up.

Actually he didn't friend.. read my post. He is using a horrible double standard. If high end feats are acceptable to show a characters upper limits when motivated. Low feats can show a characters bad choices in tactics... confidence.. blindly angry and fought dumb (personality flaw) To say one is acceptable and one isn't.. is a blatant double standard.

Originally posted by -Pr-

blight puts it well:

Umm did you see what written after that?

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Actually he didn't friend.. read my post. He is using a horrible double standard. If high end feats are acceptable to show a characters upper limits when motivated. Low feats can show a characters bad choices in tactics... confidence.. blindly angry and fought dumb (personality flaw) To say one is acceptable and one isn't.. is a blatant double standard.

maybe we're getting our wires crossed here.

When I'm talking about low showings, I'm talking about things that given a character's history/powers/intelligence, shouldn't happen at all. A gas station explosion hurting Superman, Surfer getting armbarred. Stuff like that.

Originally posted by Deadline
Umm did you see what written after that?

Yes, i did.

Originally posted by -Pr-

Yes, i did.

Yea great. Anyway you are actually both in agreement.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
That isn't logical at all... So higher feats are OKAY because they decided to let loose or something really motivated them... Yet, they can't choose the wrong strat and get beat? They can't get intimidated by a foe and not fight the way they could. You can't have it both ways and I hope you realize you're being hypocritical in your explanation.

You get so hostile over comic books, dude... I was trying to explain what pr was getting at. And I also agree with him.

So at least the people on this page are in agreement that Superman would probably merk Thanos. 😄

Thanos wins.

Muahahahaha.

Originally posted by -Pr-
maybe we're getting our wires crossed here.

gross, take it to PM guys

Originally posted by Mindset
Thanos wins.

Muahahahaha.

YouTube video

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
So at least the people on this page are in agreement that Superman would probably merk Thanos. 😄

Actually the majority feel like Thanos would crush Supes.

I dunno about merk but since Lois has been killed he could win the majority cos hes going to be a high level Superman. In other words this is Superman thats going to do high level feats.

Originally posted by Deadline
I dunno about merk but since Lois has been killed he could win the majority cos hes going to be a high level Superman. In other words this is Superman thats going to do high level feats.
What high level feats trump Thanos' average feats ?

With the ring, Superman traps Thanos in a bubble and Speedblitzs throwing his ass in the sun before Thanos gets a chance to teleport out.