Originally posted by dmills
I believe so. But even still in the MU you have to be going insanely fast to begin with to enter hyper space. Iirc of course.
The difference is though, is that I THINK he can't go that fast in normal space. I always pictured it kind of like Babylon 5, where you're going fast in hyperspace, but not as fast as if you were in our dimension.
Originally posted by dmillsYou have to go ftl. In the early days, Surfer was constantly entering hyperspace when travelling at those speeds.
I believe so. But even still in the MU you have to be going insanely fast to begin with to enter hyper space. Iirc of course.
It's not portrayed consistently, as all things comics.
Originally posted by PillarofOsiris
That sounds more like hyperbole to me.
Possibly.
But think about this. Gladiator has one of the fastest speed quotes in comic history... we are not talking about distance here because comic logic is screwed. Just look at the flash incident... he cleared an entire city... 500000 people before a nuke fully exploded. That feat alone puts him at 1000's if not millions of times the speed of light but the writer stated that he was ging under light.
What we depict as something else, writers see it different. So like I said before, quoting the distance means nothing since I think the writer is seeing all of these instances as a light speed feat.
Originally posted by NewYoker545
So if he heard the distress call due to tech, then of course he certainly flew to the other side of the universe because of tech too. The Sh'iar all can't fly trillions of miles per second, and yet they all manage to get around the universe pretty convincingly and easily.
Huh?
Why in the world would you bring up tech on a guy that has flown 100 times the speed of light? Tech had nothing to do with that.
Originally posted by PillarofOsiris
I'm absolutely speechless. I'm tempted to post an Ares vs Superman thread here and see how many people actually believe that.
qft, you know what im referring to, by no means is Ares on supes level...however, as being a "god" he has certaiin attributes that dwarf Clarks as its inherent in his nature, its not that hard a concept to grasp
Originally posted by carver9
The difference between Rogue and Parasite is that when Rogue touch you, she not only receive his powers, she also receive a person memory and skill at using that power. She has shown this on NUMEROUS of occasions. Parasite doesn't have that ability.
yes he does. he's even more consistent than rogue with it.
good god man... facepalm
Originally posted by Sin I AM
qft, you know what im referring to, by no means is Ares on supes level...however, as being a "god" he has certaiin attributes that dwarf Clarks as its inherent in his nature, its not that hard a concept to grasp
but what qualities do you mean?
Originally posted by -Pr-but what qualities do you mean?
well for one handsome, tearing thru space, handling the twilight sword, etc...things you'd expect a "god" should do, by right of his mystical nature. Im not in anyway saying he's greater than supes, im just sayin in that aspect he should be more difficult to drain than him IMO
Originally posted by Sin I AM
well for one handsome, tearing thru space, handling the twilight sword, etc...things you'd expect a "god" should do, by right of his mystical nature. Im not in anyway saying he's greater than supes, im just sayin in that aspect he should be more difficult to drain than him IMO
Ah. You could make that argument.
As gay as it sounds, though: Handsome? Really? Fan of excessive body hair, are we?
Originally posted by -Pr-
yes he does. he's even more consistent than rogue with it.good god man... facepalm
but what qualities do you mean?
Lol...Good god man? Is it like that Pr? This is the beginning of our debate, am I already driving you over the edge?
As for your comment. If she gets his knowledge and experience along with a percentage of his power (usually when she grab hold of a person, it auto paralyze them... don't know how he is getting free of her grip), what's to stop her from continuously getting more of his power until he is depleted... especially with her new found speed, durablity, and strength.
Originally posted by carver9
Lol...Good god man? Is it like that Pr? This is the beginning of our debate, am I already driving you over the edge?As for your comment. If she gets his knowledge and experience along with a percentage of his power (usually when she grab hold of a person, it auto paralyze them... don't know how he is getting free of her grip), what's to stop her from continuously getting more of his power until he is depleted... especially with her new found speed, durablity, and strength.
Your lack of knowledge about the people you're debating isn't exactly a good start.
auto-paralysis? you'd have to prove that worked on him.
she can't deplete him, because the sun will keep recharging him.
You're also forgetting about basic knowledge.
Originally posted by Sin I AM
i am fond on all things masculine, i am the anti-bieber if u will lmao
So you think Superman isn't masculine then. Gotcha.
Originally posted by -Pr-
Your lack of knowledge about the people you're debating isn't exactly a good start.auto-paralysis? you'd have to prove that worked on him.
she can't deplete him, because the sun will keep recharging him.
So you think Superman isn't masculine then. Gotcha.
Why wouldn't it ko him though when her touch did a number on people like Thor? The only argument that we have here is if Rogue could absorb faster than Superman can pull in solar energy.
Originally posted by carver9
Why wouldn't it ko him though when her touch did a number on people like Thor? The only argument that we have here is if Rogue could absorb faster than Superman can pull in solar energy.
a) Thor isn't Superman.
b) Superman is just going to let her grab him and absorb his powers when he knows what abilities she has?
Originally posted by PillarofOsiris
Superman has wielded a sword that's about a million times more powerful than the Twilight Sword. Also, Superman is not just a normal Kryptonian, he's also descended from a god.
meh...i thought that rao crap was retconned, and sword are u referencing?
Originally posted by -Pr-So you think Superman isn't masculine then. Gotcha.
masculine.......in a boyish charm sorta way i suppose but he still comes off as a puss sometimes, but i need a real man...id take teth over clark anyday
Originally posted by Sin I AM
meh...i thought that rao crap was retconned,
When?
I think it makes perfect sense though. There needs to be some explanation why he is constantly beating other kryptonians.
Originally posted by Sin I AMand sword are u referencing?
The Sword of Superman.
http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/3/34565/1355602-899052_pc6os3_super_super.gif
Originally posted by Sin I AM
meh...i thought that rao crap was retconned, and sword are u referencing?masculine.......in a boyish charm sorta way i suppose but he still comes off as a puss sometimes, but i need a real man...id take teth over clark anyday
being good =/= being a puss.
no offence, but he was real enough for catwoman, wonder woman, lois, lana, maxima, lori lemariss, cat grant, the leader of metropolis scu (who basically threw herself at him), and so on and so forth.
boyish charm... it worked for james bond.
Originally posted by -Pr-its not charm, its that they're good looking
being good =/= being a puss.no offence, but he was real enough for catwoman, wonder woman, lois, lana, maxima, lori lemariss, cat grant, the leader of metropolis scu (who basically threw herself at him), and so on and so forth.
boyish charm... it worked for james bond.
if superman or james bond were short balding guys, they wouldn't get those girls
