Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Composite Link isn't.
Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Except for the fact that Dingo actually said the feats would transfer. >_>
Originally posted by ScreamPaste
No, I'm not attacking you persoanlyl, I'm calling you on your shit.
TOmato, TomAto.
****ing PROVE Link's not a lightning timer in the face of all th evidence, maybe?
I have. You're just too stubborn to admit it.
You can't, you've tried, but all it always comes back to is denial. "That's not lightning"
The majority agrees with my stance and logic and you were unable to respond to my arguments, resulting to you rage quitting.
or "It's arching to the blade!" shit,
It is arching to the blade. That is literally what is happening. Now if you would like to argue that point then go ahead, but something tells me you neither have the chops nor the balls to do so.
the sheer consistency with which Link does this alone is enough for a case to be made,
The case has been made. It was defeated.
but we have official art
Disproven.
and mandatory canon instances.
Never fully proven and otherwise disproven.
You look at the canon and call PIS rather than simply accepting the feat.
I could lie and pretend that Link is a lightning-timer if you want. He still wont be but if you want him to be one soooooo badly that you'd prefer a fabrication to the truth then go right ahead.
Alright, let's do it your way. Zack didn't cartwheel through bullet,s they're nerf darts.
'Nerf darts'?
Composite Link. TP Link > GG's.
He must have some feats that I'm not aware of. Is it the Ganon swordlock?
Besides, Link still has nothing taht helps him against Seph porting behind him and cutting his head off.
I have. You're just too stubborn to admit it.No, you've used conjecture and denial to plug your ears and cover your eyes in the face of canon and art. 😐
The majority agrees with my stance
resulting to you rage quitting.No, the stubborn bias of the opposition leads to me rage quitting. When everyone's ****ing blindly saying and doing ANYTHING to deny another character feats against logic and canon I have every right to become annoyed, don't you think?
It is arching to the blade. That is literally what is happening. Now if you would like to argue that point then go ahead, but something tells me you neither have the chops nor the balls to do so.So Aganihm AIMED his attack at Link's sword? Yeah....
The case has been made. It was defeated.Stop claiming this without ever actually ****ign doing it, hm? Are you /trying/ to get on my nerves with your fallacious, erroneous and consistent condescension? You, nor anyone else has EVER proven that Ganon would intentionally use slower lightning than is necessary to stop someone who is trying to kill him. We have official art of Link intercepting lightning, we have multiple canon instances of him doing exactly that, against multiple foes, we have so many enemies in the ****ing games that can wield lightning that at some point it's like gravity, you just accept it because it's there. But FOR SOME REASON, (bias) everyone's willing to turn a blind eye to the fact that Link can, has, and does ****ing do this.
I could lie and pretend that Link is a lightning-timer if you want. He still wont be but if you want him to be one soooooo badly that you'd prefer and fabrication to the truth then go right ahead.
How about you actually attempt to debunk the ****ing feat for once? You keep claiming you've done it. POST IT. Show me your evidence, and why you draw the erroneous conclusion that you do? You. Have. Nothing. And this is why I get upset. Because in SPITE of that face that you have **** ALL. You continually claim in the face of art, videos, canon, that you're correct, I'm wrong, and get condescending and deny feats of a character you seem to FOLLOW AROUND with the legitimate INTENT to annoy me.
'Nerf darts'?Yes, if you can argue lightning isn't lighting I can argue bullets aren't bullets just as easily.
He must have some feats that I'm not aware of. Is it the Ganon swordlock?Besides, Link still has nothing taht helps him against Seph porting behind him and cutting his head off.
Link has:
-Lightning reaction time
-Durability surpassing Sephiroth's ability to hurt him
-Mortal draw, Seph coming close is an easy win.
No, you've used conjecture and denial to plug your ears and cover your eyes in the face of canon and art.
If by 'conjecture' you mean logic and 'cover[ing] your eyes' you mean told the truth, then yes, thats exactly what I've done.
Appeal to majority. Justin Bieber's good, then? /Strawman.
Justin Bieber is not thought to be good by the majority of the worlds populace.
No, the stubborn bias of the opposition leads to me rage quitting. When everyone's ****ing blindly saying and doing ANYTHING to deny another character feats against logic and canon I have every right to become annoyed, don't you think?
No, when everyone else is telling you that you're wrong I would think that it would be more reasonable to actually reconsider your position, to tell the truth, especially when they have multiply valid arguments as to why thats teh case.
So Aganihm AIMED his attack at Link's sword? Yeah....
The bolt is curving into the ****ing blade. If his sword wasn't there it still wouldn't hit him. You cannot deny this, it is right there.
My theory is that the blade is acting as a rudimentary lightning rod. If you have any other explanation that actually makes sense, then I would be glad to hear it.
Stop claiming this without ever actually ****ign doing it, hm?
I did do it. Last thread you brought up the same arguement about consistency and it was defeated.
Are you /trying/ to get on my nerves with your fallacious, erroneous and consistent condescension?
Yes. I want you to actually debate me instead of raging about how horribly 'biased' I am. You think I'm biased? Tough ****ing luck. If I'm really so biased then it should be easy to beat me.
You, nor anyone else has EVER proven that Ganon would intentionally use slower lightning than is necessary to stop someone who is trying to kill him.
There have been several valid explanations for why that could be the case. Though it hardly needs one given that we SEE IT BEING SLOWER THAN LIGHTNING!
We have official art of Link intercepting lightning,
No, you don't.
we have multiple canon instances of him doing exactly that, against multiple foes, we have so many enemies in the ****ing games that can wield lightning that at some point it's like gravity,
Guess what? People can fight dudes with guns without being bullet-timers. Guess what else? People can fight dudes with lightning without being lightning-timers.
How about you actually attempt to debunk the ****ing feat for once? You keep claiming you've done it. POST IT.
I don't need to post it. You were there and you were unable to beat my last arguement when I asked you to use something other than gameplay mechanics to prove that its lightning. Then you gave up and left. Forgive me for assuming that I won that argument.
You. Have. Nothing.
Yes, if you can argue lightning isn't lighting I can argue bullets aren't bullets just as easily.
And your evidence is?
-Lightning reaction time
Yah, right. 🙄
-Durability surpassing Sephiroth's ability to hurt him
Seph was slicing up meter-thick metal and skyscrapers like they were butter. He'll need some fricking good durability feats.
-Mortal draw, Seph coming close is an easy win.
Mortal Draw is no faster than Links ordinary attacks. And he'll need alot faster to stand a chance of hitting Sephiroth.
Gameplay mechanic.
Either: Animations are not mechanics.
OR
If they are: the 'sparks' indicating it to be lightning is also a gameplay mechanic, therefore you cannot prove it to be lightning at all.
My argument is unbeatable.
The same as your evidence it's not lightning. smile DOESN'T LOOK LIKE IT TO ME.
Really, why would that be? Is there something indicating that they are not bullets or are you merely behaving like a petulant child?
Link <Seph < Lightning.
Fixed.