King Tut's DNA leaked to be 99.6% anglo/saxon celtic. WTF?

For nearly two thousand years, the anglo saxon race has maintainend a traditional belief that they were from the middle east. Mainly Egypt and Israel. This article may prove it. "Despite the refusal of Sec General of Egyptian Supreme Council on Antiquities, Zah Hawass, to release and DNA results which would prove the Race of King Tut, the information was accidentally leaked recently by The Discovery Chann show that, contrary to tradition and Hawass, the King's DNA came back 99.6 percent western anglo saxon. Not Arab as previously thought. After Finding out the info was leaked, Hawass cited the reason for the coverup was 'immediate and violatile consequences due to the verse in the quran which states all Pharoair were arab" "The specific DNA strain is only present in the anglo saxon celtic race, says hawass." This goes right along with Britishisraelite beliefs.

Correction: All pharaohs were Anglo-Saxon, and all pharaohs were from Egypt. Egypt was a satellite state of Atlantis. Ergo: All Anglo-Saxons are Atlantean.

I'm glad i'm a celt.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Correction: All pharaohs were Anglo-Saxon, and all pharaohs were from Egypt. Egypt was a satellite state of Atlantis. Ergo: All Anglo-Saxons are Atlantean.

[citation needed]

White lies.

http://white-history.com/hwr8.htm

Meh I think the Visi-goth were in North Africa for a bit but that was after the Egyptian Empire.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
[citation needed]

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
[citation needed]

I googled it for you, since he's a lazy ass.

http://www.eutimes.net/2010/06/king-tuts-dna-is-western-european/

Originally posted by Robtard
I googled it for you, since he's a lazy ass.

http://www.eutimes.net/2010/06/king-tuts-dna-is-western-european/

from this:

The DNA test results were inadvertently revealed on a Discovery Channel TV documentary

very well, we can all stop treating this as though it has any credible source

Don't tell Islam. blowup

Egyptian Pharaohs were of pure Greek ancestry.. Thus they had white skin, european features, could have blue eyes, fair hair...

And then came the Romans who went over to Briton and conquered it, and they were from the same part of the world as Pharaohs. And the Roman soldiers became citizens of Rome that lived in Briton, and began families.

Therefore what we consider today as "English Ancestry" is actually Roman and Greek Ancestry and as explained earlier, Pharaohs came from a Greek gene pool.

Tada!

Originally posted by siriuswriter
Egyptian Pharaohs were of pure Greek ancestry.. Thus they had white skin, european features, could have blue eyes, fair hair...

And then came the Romans who went over to Briton and conquered it, and they were from the same part of the world as Pharaohs. And the Roman soldiers became citizens of Rome that lived in Briton, and began families.

Therefore what we consider today as "English Ancestry" is actually Roman and Greek Ancestry and as explained earlier, Pharaohs came from a Greek gene pool.

Tada!

Certainly the Ptolmeic Pharaohs were Greek but before this I've never heard the suggestion that all of them were/

Originally posted by siriuswriter
Egyptian Pharaohs were of pure Greek ancestry.

Before Ptolemy, doutbful.

edit: beaten to the punch again.

Oh, yes. Because Cleopatra dying kind of ran that race... out.

*headdesk*

Originally posted by siriuswriter
Oh, yes. Because Cleopatra dying kind of ran that race... out.

*headdesk*

Ptolemy came before Cleopatra, we are talking about the same Cleopatra the last Pharoah of Egypt, no?

Correct - but Ptolemy was the only name that male heirs used. Girls could only be Cleopatra or Arsinoe.

And remember that there was a Ptolemy who was a Roman leader, who was murdered by Ptolemy who was one of Cleopatra's [THE Cleopatra's] younger brother. All of Cleopatra's siblings were killed or executed before her death, her younger-younger brother Ptolemy died from some sort of disease.

So which Ptolemy are we talking of?

Originally posted by siriuswriter
Correct - but Ptolemy was the only name that male heirs used. Girls could only be Cleopatra or Arsinoe.

And remember that there was a Ptolemy who was a Roman leader, who was murdered by Ptolemy who was one of Cleopatra's [THE Cleopatra's] younger brother. All of Cleopatra's siblings were killed or executed before her death, her younger-younger brother Ptolemy died from some sort of disease.

So which Ptolemy are we talking of?

Ptolemy I Soter, general of Alexander the Great and founder of the Ptolemaic or 32nd Dynasty of Egypt in the year 305 BC.

Egypt, however, has a history going back to 3000BC. I have never heard that Hotepsekhemwy was European. Or Tutankhamun. Or Ramses. Or Akenaten.

Originally posted by siriuswriter
Correct - but Ptolemy was the only name that male heirs used. Girls could only be Cleopatra or Arsinoe.

And remember that there was a Ptolemy who was a Roman leader, who was murdered by Ptolemy who was one of Cleopatra's [THE Cleopatra's] younger brother. All of Cleopatra's siblings were killed or executed before her death, her younger-younger brother Ptolemy died from some sort of disease.

So which Ptolemy are we talking of?

The first, the one that started the Greek Pharaoh Dynasty, which is what we're talking about, the Pharaohs and Greeks.

Before [around] 300BC, there's no indication that the Pharaohs were Greeks. There was also a length of time in Egypt that the Pharaohs were Black, after the Nubians from the South conquered Egypt and set up their own Dynasty. But Tut was around long before either the Greek and Nubian Dynasty.