King Tut's DNA leaked to be 99.6% anglo/saxon celtic. WTF?

Started by Robtard5 pages

You dumped a 4year old thread to prove that you didn't source your material and plagiarized back then as well. Good job, Longpig.

Originally posted by Robtard
You dumped a 4year old thread to prove that you didn't source your material and plagiarized back then as well. Good job, Longpig.

Yes, my illegal Mexican friend. Your constant female nagging has paid off.

Originally posted by Robtard
White lies.

When all the white people are gone who will you blame?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
When all the white people are gone who will you blame?

White ghosts!

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
When all the white people are gone who will you blame?

Good job missing the context. It was a joke aimed at FoTN, as he was active here back then and would (and later actually did) have said something of that nature in a thread like this.

Ok but seriously who will you blame?

The Greeks?

Originally posted by Robtard
The Greeks?

Greeks are horrible.

😂

On topic, has this been proven false? Was tut a white guy?

Originally posted by long pig
On topic, has this been proven false? Was tut a white guy?

No he was from Guatemala but is caucasian.

Tut being so is very doubtful- he's one of the last members of a dynasty that married with a lot of other people in the area, and, well, we have art of how they painted his skin color, and it was *quite* tan.

But something I want to point out, there were 32 dynasties of Paraohs, minimum (there's at least one, maybe more, likely-to-have-existed-short-lived ones). As in, 32 entire different families. Several of which from other areas originally like Greece or Kush (A Kingdom that lasted for about 700 years in what is now Sudan), over a period of over three thousand years.

There are ones who were dark skinned, light skinned, in between, quite a variety. Lots of ethnicities.

People do underestimate just how *big* Egyptian history is.

He was prolly from Guatamala or Honduras.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
He was prolly from Guatamala or Honduras.

Nah, he was a Puerto Rican.

Originally posted by long pig
On topic, has this been proven false? Was tut a white guy?

Considering his bloodline's penchant for sexing and marrying their own relatives; especially siblings, he was probably a white guy from the South.

Originally posted by Robtard
Considering his bloodline's penchant for sexing and marrying their own relatives; especially siblings, he was probably a white guy from the South.

Sex, like money is best kept in the family.

Originally posted by Robtard
Considering his bloodline's penchant for sexing and marrying their own relatives; especially siblings, he was probably a white guy from the South.

Word. If he were a biggoted white guy who pretended to be cosmopolitan and feigned tolerance while refusing to associate with any other races I'd think he was probably from NY or Boston.

If he were high on his own smug and thought himself better than the rest of society I'd assume that he probably resided in Cali, though. Seems to be common with those people. 😄

Originally posted by Ascendancy
Word. If he were a biggoted white guy who pretended to be cosmopolitan and feigned tolerance while refusing to associate with any other races I'd think he was probably from NY or Boston.

If he were high on his own smug and thought himself better than the rest of society I'd assume that he probably resided in Cali, though. Seems to be common with those people. 😄

Would it have been so strange for ancient Egypt to have been one if not the first racial melting pots known to man? The climate is certainly ideal for most if not all, and why would interracial relationships shock so many? People are people after all, and time isn't going to change the idea that White, Black, Asian, Hispanic, Indian and every other ethnicity in between has people that are extremely attracted to people outside of their common circle. My great grand father on my mothers side was a very pale skinned Caucasoid from Scotland, but you'd never know this by looking at me. My grandmother from my fathers side is 100% Cherokee Indian and she married a Black man, my mother then married a Cherokee Indian Man. My point is that these types of things have been going on for a very long time.

Why would this somehow indicate that all Anglo Saxons were from Egypt, when all we need do is realize that interracial couplings are even more ancient than Egypt itself? Could this somehow play into Tut's DNA being what it is? A lot of people should actually go and get themselves tested. I'm almost certain that many will be surprised by the findings to say the least.

Originally posted by Stoic
Would it have been so strange for ancient Egypt to have been one if not the first racial melting pots known to man? The climate is certainly ideal for most if not all, and why would interracial relationships shock so many? People are people after all, and time isn't going to change the idea that White, Black, Asian, Hispanic, Indian and every other ethnicity in between has people that are extremely attracted to people outside of their common circle. My great grand father on my mothers side was a very pale skinned Caucasoid from Scotland, but you'd never know this by looking at me. My grandmother from my fathers side is 100% Cherokee Indian and she married a Black man, my mother then married a Cherokee Indian Man. My point is that these types of things have been going on for a very long time.

Why would this somehow indicate that all Anglo Saxons were from Egypt, when all we need do is realize that interracial couplings are even more ancient than Egypt itself? Could this somehow play into Tut's DNA being what it is? A lot of people should actually go and get themselves tested. I'm almost certain that many will be surprised by the findings to say the least.


I got tested. Apparently I'm 99% BOSS AS ****!! 1% Cherokee Indian.