Graviton vs Superman

Started by dmills6 pages
Originally posted by batdude123
Except that he isn't. Either going by feats, or direct comparisons/showings.

Direct comparisons? Such as?

Originally posted by Philosophía
Lawlz @ Graviton being anything more than a villain of the week for a guy who bathes in blackholes.

Superman is not Thor, he'd destroy Graviton in anything resembling a confrontation.

😂

Such as the canon to both companies crossover that we aren't allowed to use due to the butthurt uprising on the part of Thor fans.

Originally posted by batdude123
And as an attempt to seem more mature than his 12 years of existence on planet Earth would suggest, he also has a sig that includes Bob Dylan, The Beatles, and Simon and Garfunkle. As if he doesn't listen to Lady Gaga, Lil Wayne, and Wiz Khalifa.

What a sly little devil he is.

OK for one I love simon and garfunkel, the beatles and bob dylan.

I don't listen to lady gaga, and I don't even know who the other two are!

Originally posted by Philosophía
Even the worst Thor fans like rage don't think he is stronger, and give Superman a slight edge in strength.

But blackbolt z, with his high iq, surely sees something they don't.

I just personally see him as stronger.

I also see superman as more durable so it compensates.

Graviton still wins though as this thread isn't about thor.

Originally posted by batdude123
Such as the canon to both companies crossover that we aren't allowed to use due to the butthurt uprising on the part of Thor fans.
Damn. I never really got into the whole controversy over that crossover. So Marvel did in fact initially consider it Canon?

Originally posted by dmills
Damn. I never really got into the whole controversy over that crossover. So Marvel did in fact initially consider it Canon?

In reality I think that is exactly how a fight between Thor and Superman would go down. Just like in the crossover.

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
If Extremis Iron Man can run a train on Graviton, then Superman clearly can't.

Correct me if I'm wrong but wan't that turning his lobotomy time and not as powerful?

Originally posted by Black bolt z
I also see superman as more durable so it compensates.
That's like saying that you believe that Earth is the center of the Universe, but not that it's flat so it all evens out.
Originally posted by dmills
Damn. I never really got into the whole controversy over that crossover. So Marvel did in fact initially consider it Canon?
What initially? It's still canon. It has been referenced in handbooks, but Tom Brevoort has directly said that the reason they haven't had a story like DC continuing directly from JLA/Avengers, is because there wasn't one - as the main plot points, Krona/Cosmic egg and such, was all DC's property.

And you'd have to be an idiot to think Marvel's position is that it's an alternate universe in the first place. You think all the Thor fans are angry because Superman beat Earth 5454 Thor? Or you think all the continuous shit Kurt Busiek and Tom Brevoort get is because of the same reason? Don't be ignorant.

Originally posted by Hyperion Prime
In reality I think that is exactly how a fight between Thor and Superman would go down. Just like in the crossover.
I can dig it. Although I don't see Thor getting ktfo like that. Nothing in his history indicates that he'd get chumped like that from a single blow. While on one knee no less lmao!

Originally posted by Philosophía
That's like saying that you believe that Earth is the center of the Universe, but not that it's flat so it all evens out.
That is possibly the worst analogy I have ever heard.

It has absolutely nothing to do with anything...

Originally posted by Black bolt z
That is possibly the worst analogy I have ever heard.

It has absolutely nothing to do with anything...

snicker

Originally posted by Philosophía
That's like saying that you believe that Earth is the center of the Universe, but not that it's flat so it all evens out. What initially? It's still canon. It has been referenced in handbooks, but Tom Brevoort has directly said that the reason they haven't had a story like DC continuing directly from JLA/Avengers, is because there wasn't one - as the main plot points, Krona/Cosmic egg and such, was all DC's property.

And you'd have to be an idiot to think Marvel's position is that it's an alternate universe in the first place. You think all the Thor fans are angry because Superman beat Earth 5454 Thor? Or you think all the continuous shit Kurt Busiek and Tom Brevoort get is because of the same reason? Don't be ignorant.

You're being a bit over sensitive. I don't know about what stance who took on what. I only know that Busiek got a lot of shyte for the fight sequence itself, but as far as company stances regarding canon vis a vis JLA/Avengers I have/had no clue.

Please understand that my love of Marvel extends mainly to Nova, Iron Fist and what extends from them. I don't give a shyte about 99% of their other respective properties. So when I say I had no clue, I really mean it because frankly I don't give a damn enough about the issues at hand to research any of it.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
That is possibly the worst analogy I have ever heard.

It has absolutely nothing to do with anything...

Do you look up to Justin Bieber as your dream big brother?

Originally posted by Philosophía
Do you look up to Justin Bieber as your dream big brother?
durpalm

Either stop trolling or begone.

Is it safe to say say Venom > Superman then?

Originally posted by SamZED
Is it safe to say say Venom > Superman then?
Because everybody knows that story is in continuity and the writers are still aggresivly harrassed?

Originally posted by Philosophía
Because everybody knows that story is in continuity and the writers are still aggresivly harrassed?
Dude why are you even arguing this?

this is straight from the rules.

"Comic book crossovers are usually unusable as they ignore common sense most of the time (DC vs. Marvel is certainly unusable in some cases in our debates!).

This includes JLA/Avengers. Canon or not, people just aren't going to agree on it in most cases. Besides, there should be plenty of other comics with which to make your point."

Originally posted by SamZED
Is it safe to say say Venom > Superman then?

Why not?

I like how Thor came off looking better than Clark against Professor Hulk though. Pushing him to his very limits while attempting to destroy the surroundings and what not.

DC vs. Marvel is cannon. Referenced in the comics and even stated to be in continuity by the writers. 👆

Originally posted by PhilosophÃ_a
the writers are still aggresivly harrassed?

This is some hilariously shitty reasoning if you're trying to make the point that I think you are.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Why not?

I like how Thor came off looking better than Clark against Professor Hulk though. Pushing him to his very limits while attempting to destroy the surroundings and what not.

DC vs. Marvel is cannon. Referenced in the comics and even stated to be in continuity by the writers. 👆

This is some hilariously shitty reasoning if you're trying to make the point that I think you are.

Clearly Philo is of the opinion that JLA/Avengers is not only canon, but unequivocally so. What's your angle on jla/avengers?

Edit: Double post