Originally posted by h1a8
Ok what feats does Thanos have (could be any type of feats and not just lifting ones) that prove he is a lot more than just a little stronger than Thor?
You need to learn that lifting feats isn't everything that you make it out to be. Doomsday, Darkseid, Orion, Konvikt, Grundy, Shaggyman, the General, Titus, Black Adam, Captain Marvel... etc, etc, doesn't have a single lifting feat under their belts and each of these people have either taken Supes down physically or stalemated him in a physical fight.
Thanos doesn't need a lifting feat to prove that he is stronger than Thor... him stalemating Tyrant is proof enough, him lasting against Odin is proof enough, Maker, etc, etc...
Get over your lifting feat/combo to ko crap and understand CIS AND ranking.
Thanos is a villian, he has no reason to aid in moving a planet. What we do have is Thanos fighting Drax which lead to a planet exploding and we also have him and Champion fighting which lead to a planet exploding. That alone is enough proof.
Who is stronger... Doomsday or Colossus? Who is stronger, Orion or Spiderman?
Originally posted by Black bolt zBeating someone doesn't prove stronger. Spidey can beat many stronger foes, so can batman and CA. Zoom can beat stronger foes too. Also A can beat B with blasts, which doesn't show who is stronger.
I don't know...beating the crap outta thor?
It is how one beats someone and not just the fact they beat them.
Originally posted by carver9
You need to learn that lifting feats isn't everything that you make it out to be. Doomsday, Darkseid, Orion, Konvikt, Grundy, Shaggyman, the General, Titus, Black Adam, Captain Marvel... etc, etc, doesn't have a single lifting feat under their belts and each of these people have either taken Supes down physically or stalemated him in a physical fight.Thanos doesn't need a lifting feat to prove that he is stronger than Thor... him stalemating Tyrant is proof enough, him lasting against Odin is proof enough, Maker, etc, etc...
Get over your lifting feat/combo to ko crap and understand CIS AND ranking.
Thanos is a villian, he has no reason to aid in moving a planet. What we do have is Thanos fighting Drax which lead to a planet exploding and we also have him and Champion fighting which lead to a planet exploding. That alone is enough proof.
Who is stronger... Doomsday or Colossus? Who is stronger, Orion or Spiderman?
Learn to read Carver. I said, "no lifting feats". Just give reasons (any) of why Thanos is more than just a little stronger than Thor.
Tryant feat doesn't do it for Thanos was amped with cube and Tyrant himself hasn't shown superior physical strength over Thor.
The Odin and Maker fights had nothing to do with physical strength. Now you are getting dumber.
Originally posted by h1a8
Learn to read Carver. I said, "no lifting feats". Just give reasons (any) of why Thanos is more than just a little stronger than Thor.
Tryant feat doesn't do it for Thanos was amped with cube and Tyrant himself hasn't shown superior physical strength over Thor.
The Odin and Maker fights had nothing to do with physical strength. Now you are getting dumber.
Uuummm... you know that orb that Thanos was carrying around during his fight against Tyrant... the one that you are using as an amp, well, he added that power onto himself... it is a part of him now.
Again, Thanos doesn't need lifting feats, him taking Skyfathers is proof enough that he is above Thor... him physically destroying Thor is proof enough of this. Him defeating Captain Marv-el as easily as he did is proof enough. Tyrant ranked him above the combined forces of Gladiator, Bill, Surfer, Terrax, along with numerous of other Heralds and Tyrant stated that Thanos was above them which was easily proven when he stalemated him whereas the Heralds got pounded on with ease, Heralds that are in Thor tier. Then we have Thanos hanging in a fight against an amped Thor that was already in a Warrior Madness state but also empowered by the power gem.
Now answer my question... who is stronger... Colossus or Doomsday?
Originally posted by h1a8You make zero sense and argue based off of fights alone while ignoring character matchups which prove how these guys match up against each other.
Learn to read Carver. I said, "no lifting feats". Just give reasons (any) of why Thanos is more than just a little stronger than Thor.
Tryant feat doesn't do it for Thanos was amped with cube and Tyrant himself hasn't shown superior physical strength over Thor.
The Odin and Maker fights had nothing to do with physical strength. Now you are getting dumber.
Originally posted by carver9
You need to learn that lifting feats isn't everything that you make it out to be. Doomsday, Darkseid, Orion, Konvikt, Grundy, Shaggyman, the General, Titus, Black Adam, Captain Marvel... etc, etc, doesn't have a single lifting feat under their belts and each of these people have either taken Supes down physically or stalemated him in a physical fight.
Umm, several of those actually do have lifting feats.
If you actually read the comics, you'd know that. 😬
I'm amazed Carver. You used to ***** and ***** and ***** about how match-ups weren't valid when comparing strength, and now you've done a complete 180.
Originally posted by -Pr-
Umm, several of those actually do have lifting feats.If you actually read the comics, you'd know that. 😬
I'm amazed Carver. You used to ***** and ***** and ***** about how match-ups weren't valid when comparing strength, and now you've done a complete 180.
KMC is slowly changing me. 😈
Majority of them don't have lifting feats.
Carver, to say Thanos "takes Skyfathers" or "stalemated" Tyrant is hokum.
Thor is physically inferior to both Doomsday and the General. Without his other powers, it is questionable whether Thanos could put Doomsday down, and it is simply impossible for him to put the General down. I am perplexed that this is not obvious (though I respect the fact that Quan disagrees on account of his religion).
Originally posted by Simbon
Carver, to say Thanos "takes Skyfathers" or "stalemated" Tyrant is hokum.Thor is physically inferior to both Doomsday and the General. Without his other powers, it is questionable whether Thanos could put Doomsday down, and it is simply impossible for him to put the General down. I am perplexed that this is not obvious (though I respect the fact that Quan disagrees on account of his religion).
They dnt possess the power to put Thanos down whereas the same can't be said for them. Thanos is above anyone they faced. By the end of the fight, they WILL be wrecked and wrecked seriously. Hulk>General. Hulk is FAR more powerful physically than the general and I would give Thanos almost even odds against Hulk in a fist fight.
Originally posted by carver9Why do you continue to talk about lifting feats? We don't have to use them. Ill accept punching and grappling feats. To prove you are not bias then just tell me why you think Thanos is more than just a little stronger. You can say, "because the sky is blue." as a reason.
Uuummm... you know that orb that Thanos was carrying around during his fight against Tyrant... the one that you are using as an amp, well, he added that power onto himself... it is a part of him now.Again, Thanos doesn't need lifting feats, him taking Skyfathers is proof enough that he is above Thor... him physically destroying Thor is proof enough of this. Him defeating Captain Marv-el as easily as he did is proof enough. Tyrant ranked him above the combined forces of Gladiator, Bill, Surfer, Terrax, along with numerous of other Heralds and Tyrant stated that Thanos was above them which was easily proven when he stalemated him whereas the Heralds got pounded on with ease, Heralds that are in Thor tier. Then we have Thanos hanging in a fight against an amped Thor that was already in a Warrior Madness state but also empowered by the power gem.
Now answer my question... who is stronger... Colossus or Doomsday?
With that said, taking anyone doesn't translate to being physically stronger. Blasts and durability against blasts doesn't translate to being stronger than X character. This is common sense. Tyrant never physically overpowered anyone. He used blasts, especially to stun Glads and then he became physical. Even Thor is strong enough to seriously damage Glads with strikes provided that Glads gets stunned first. Hulk himself can serious mess Glads up provided Glads is stunned first too.
Thor was never in WM, as the comic stated. The PG wasn't proven to even add more than 2x Thor's strength. Each specific physical thing that Thor did, a pissed off Thor could do.
And DD alone would wreck Thanos in at most a couple of pages. Fact!
Originally posted by carver9
They dnt possess the power to put Thanos down whereas the same can't be said for them. Thanos is above anyone they faced. By the end of the fight, they WILL be wrecked and wrecked seriously. Hulk>General. Hulk is FAR more powerful physically than the general and I would give Thanos almost even odds against Hulk in a fist fight.
I suggest you re-read the JLA arc with the General.
Originally posted by carver9
They dnt possess the power to put Thanos down whereas the same can't be said for them. Thanos is above anyone they faced. By the end of the fight, they WILL be wrecked and wrecked seriously. Hulk>General. Hulk is FAR more powerful physically than the general and I would give Thanos almost even odds against Hulk in a fist fight.
You think Hulk could manhandle supes and orion at the same time?
Originally posted by carver9
The Superman that fought HP Doomsday is weaker than current Supes. I would give current Supes the edge in a fight against HP Doomsday. HP Doomsday fought a much weaker JLA.He would not last against Thanos just like General wouldn't. I would give Supes a 7 or 8/10 against Doomsday and since I thing Thanos is >Superman... you get the point.
Eilings get punched to sleep as well and using his showings against a weaker JLA isn't going to help your case.
.........