Originally posted by King Kandy
So why are you even trying to argue here anymore? We showed an obvious problem in your ideas. And you don't even have a clue how to rationalize it. So you basically don't care whether what you're saying is right or not or even makes sense.
That isn't true. I responded to the question of "why God doesn't come down in a fiery chariot". I never made the claim that I knew why He doesn't perform things like that today.
Though, I think that He doesn't pull burning bush stunts today because it would prove that he exists. Which, according to Pascal, would be an infringement on "free will" in a sense.
According to Pascal, God gives us enough evidence so that those who really seek Him will find Him, and a sufficient lack of evidence so that those who do not want anything to do with Him have the option of doing just that. God doesn't want to force us to believe in Him.
EDIT: Ah, sorry. Left out an important part. God doesn't part the red sea today because with news and current technology it would spread to the whole world and everyone would be forced to believe. In old times, it was only a select people who ever truely witnessed it. That, and the above stuff.