Should feats only be a maximum of five years old

Started by Sr J-Bieb2 pages

Originally posted by Daemon Seed
Why?
Because you come on here off a 100+ account banned streak, and expect us to limit our comic usage to within five years just because a few characters have changed... in origins?

You erase feats, comparisons, and just general events just because.

There's a reason people specify different versions.

And a bunch of other shit that I didn't try to cover, but it's there, waiting.

No, it it's canon it still counts. I have seen a lot of posters take pot shots at certain characters feats if they are outdated due to further their own personal agenda.

If we took this poster at his word then might as well argue each writer's version of a character since each writer is completely different with regards to what they deem a character capable of.

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
Because you come on here off a 100+ account banned streak, and expect us to limit our comic usage to within five years just because a few characters have changed... in origins?

You erase feats, comparisons, and just general events just because.

There's a reason people specify different versions.

And a bunch of other shit that I didn't try to cover, but it's there, waiting.

You seem to have an issue with me :/ weird.