Not only is this thread aweful but the arguments in the thread are just as bad. So it goes like... we are going to make the hammer operate the the best of its abilities.. when that was never stated in the OP. Then they assume the hammer is A LOT smarter than Thor considering their answers. If the hammer could do all this stuff.. yet Thor never does.. so a sentient hammer has displayed vast more knowledge and skill than Thor over has or can hope to? Interesting the low-balling of Thor for the Hammers sake lol. What's worse, there are ZERO displays of such intelligence by the hammer alone which make me go WTF on how they are then making it exponentionally smarter than Thor. So Thor with the same hammer and him fighting with it gets wrecked by Thanos, which the people who are voting for the hammer have agreed with countless times. Yet, the hammer fighting alone is greater than thor wielding it? lol hilarious low-balling of Thor.. but I actually kinda like it.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi👆
Not only is this thread aweful but the arguments in the thread are just as bad. So it goes like... we are going to make the hammer operate the the best of its abilities.. when that was never stated in the OP. Then they assume the hammer is A LOT smarter than Thor considering their answers. If the hammer could do all this stuff.. yet Thor never does.. so a sentient hammer has displayed vast more knowledge and skill than Thor over has or can hope to? Interesting the low-balling of Thor for the Hammers sake lol. What's worse, there are ZERO displays of such intelligence by the hammer alone which make me go WTF on how they are then making it exponentionally smarter than Thor. So Thor with the same hammer and him fighting with it gets wrecked by Thanos, which the people who are voting for the hammer have agreed with countless times. Yet, the hammer fighting alone is greater than thor wielding it? lol hilarious low-balling of Thor.. but I actually kinda like it.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Not only is this thread aweful but the arguments in the thread are just as bad. So it goes like... we are going to make the hammer operate the the best of its abilities.. when that was never stated in the OP. Then they assume the hammer is A LOT smarter than Thor considering their answers. If the hammer could do all this stuff.. yet Thor never does.. so a sentient hammer has displayed vast more knowledge and skill than Thor over has or can hope to? Interesting the low-balling of Thor for the Hammers sake lol. What's worse, there are ZERO displays of such intelligence by the hammer alone which make me go WTF on how they are then making it exponentionally smarter than Thor. So Thor with the same hammer and him fighting with it gets wrecked by Thanos, which the people who are voting for the hammer have agreed with countless times. Yet, the hammer fighting alone is greater than thor wielding it? lol hilarious low-balling of Thor.. but I actually kinda like it.
Where is the OP did it state the hammer was working at max capacity in every area of this fight?
What are the showings of the hammer on its own to justify all these crazy these people are saying the hammer will do?
So, Thor with the hammer has NEVER beaten Thanos one v one. Yet, his hammer will find a way to win and operate at higher levels than the God of Thunder can have it operate at.. So in essence you guys are saying Thor is inferior to his own hammer and it's better off without him?
To answer your question... All thanos needs is mere gestures.. whether it be a force block, TK and stopping it dead in its tracks, BFR with another gesture, Raise shields which without the PG its never penetrated. Now answer my questions
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiWhen Thor had the hammer the weakness was him. He was the one that can be koed or killed by Thanos. With Thor koed the hammer becomes useless and thus Thanos wins. Well in this fight there is no Thor to ko to win the fight. Thanos must ko the hammer in order to win, which is a hell of a lot different I would say so. Anyway, all sentient beings CAN LEARN. So even if the hammer doesn't start off fighting like people are saying then I see no reason of why it can't eventually (even after a year of fighting). Also the hammer can phase through barriers and travel trough dimensions so it can't be trapped nor bfred.
Where is the OP did it state the hammer was working at max capacity in every area of this fight?What are the showings of the hammer on its own to justify all these crazy these people are saying the hammer will do?
So, Thor with the hammer has NEVER beaten Thanos one v one. Yet, his hammer will find a way to win and operate at higher levels than the God of Thunder can have it operate at.. So in essence you guys are saying Thor is inferior to his own hammer and it's better off without him?
To answer your question... All thanos needs is mere gestures.. whether it be a force block, TK and stopping it dead in its tracks, BFR with another gesture, Raise shields which without the PG its never penetrated. Now answer my questions
Also Thanos seems to be able to block stuff when he sees it coming (Thor telegraphed the throw and Thanos was expecting it). But the hammer could simply manuever around Thanos far faster than he can turn around. It can bust through Thanos shields (even after multiple blows to do it). Thor throwing the hammer, it becomes a projectile which is easy to stop (like catching a baseball). But a continuous force along with the great initial velocity and I don't see Thanos stopping the hammer, even if he sees it coming. For stopping a projectile is nowhere near the same as stopping a rocket. The rocket continues to press with the same force while a projectile doesn't.
So eventually the hammer wins.
Please show me these instances of the Hammer adapting to an opponent on its own?
Next please show me any showing where the hammer was using all the exotic abilities and powers on its own?
Lastly, you act like Thor's hammer has never been stopped by Thanos with EASE.. it has 2 times onpanel.. with mere gestures. You act like it hasn't been broken and is idestructable.. which it is not in fact.
As much as you guys love lowballing Thor.. I won't... The hammer with Thor is better than without...
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiEh Powergem Thor took out thanos sheilds Mjolnir moving at full speed will do the same. The Thrad itself is Mjolnir at its best You asking to show the Hammer adapter on it owns it a poor debating since this Thread is IF MJOLNIR ACTED on its own 🙄
Please show me these instances of the Hammer adapting to an opponent on its own?Next please show me any showing where the hammer was using all the exotic abilities and powers on its own?
Lastly, you act like Thor's hammer has never been stopped by Thanos with EASE.. it has 2 times onpanel.. with mere gestures. You act like it hasn't been broken and is idestructable.. which it is not in fact.
As much as you guys love lowballing Thor.. I won't... The hammer with Thor is better than without...
Please point out where it says Mjolnir at full capacity using all its abilities bloodlusted. I saw NO such thing ANYWHERE. Furthermore, you just stated the KEY difference there... Thor was in a quasi MW state AND had a significant amp via the PG. A huge huge difference from normal powered Thor or Mjolnir.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Please show me these instances of the Hammer adapting to an opponent on its own?Next please show me any showing where the hammer was using all the exotic abilities and powers on its own?
Lastly, you act like Thor's hammer has never been stopped by Thanos with EASE.. it has 2 times onpanel.. with mere gestures. You act like it hasn't been broken and is idestructable.. which it is not in fact.
As much as you guys love lowballing Thor.. I won't... The hammer with Thor is better than without...
The mere fact that sentient beings can learn shows that it will adapt.
Otherwise it wouldn't be a sentient being by definition.
And stopping a projectile is not the same as stopping a rocket.
A projectile has 0 force acting on it but only momentum and kinetic energy in the thrown direction. But a rocket/missile has force has not only momentum and kinetic energy but it has FORCE.
Thanos managed to stop a 0 force object 1 foot from hitting him. It took him 1 foot of distance to stop it. Now imagine the hammer going even faster and now applying a force. Thanos wouldn't be able to stop it then.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiTHE WM was only driving Thor to be blood lust as for the power Gem it amping was only a small portion at the time but growing either way i Though see how Thor with does amps would hit as hard as Mjolnir going FTL
Please point out where it says Mjolnir at full capacity using all its abilities bloodlusted. I saw NO such thing ANYWHERE. Furthermore, you just stated the KEY difference there... Thor was in a quasi MW state AND had a significant amp via the PG. A huge huge difference from normal powered Thor or Mjolnir.
Originally posted by h1a8
The mere fact that sentient beings can learn shows that it will adapt.
Otherwise it wouldn't be a sentient being by definition.And stopping a projectile is not the same as stopping a rocket.
A projectile has 0 force acting on it but only momentum and kinetic energy in the thrown direction. But a rocket/missile has force has not only momentum and kinetic energy but it has FORCE.
Thanos managed to stop a 0 force object 1 foot from hitting him. It took him 1 foot of distance to stop it. Now imagine the hammer going even faster and now applying a force. Thanos wouldn't be able to stop it then.
So all that and you could even point me to ANY situation where the Hammer did anything like what you're talking about? Thought so.
Originally posted by DarkOdin
THE WM was only driving Thor to be blood lust as for the power Gem it amping was only a small portion at the time but growing either way i Though see how Thor with does amps would hit as hard as Mjolnir going FTL
Really? You fail to see how a Quasi WM Bloodlusted Thor wielding an object of infinite power hits hard then a hammer just flying at FTL.. I don't see how that is hard to see at all, in fact, it's common sense.