Thor's hammer vs Thanos

Originally posted by quanchi112
When has it ever crushed someone's head by falling on top of it let alone someone of Thanos' magnitude. Do you ever think before you post?

Thanos magnitude is garbage level if you ask me. I think he has lower physical blunt durability than Superman. I would say him and Thor is about tied in that aspect. His body is more softer and can't resist hard attacks (attacks from hardened materials) as well some others.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thanos magnitude is garbage level if you ask me. I think he has lower physical blunt durability than Superman. I would say him and Thor is about tied in that aspect. His body is more softer and can't resist hard attacks (attacks from hardened materials) as well some others.

Originally posted by h1a8
if you ask me.

Originally posted by h1a8
It was a joke. The hammer wouldn't crush anyone's head as the head is not a hand. The enchantment only works if someone is trying to lift it on purpose (specifically, but not exclusive, with their hands).

Thanos magnitude is garbage level if you ask me. I think he has lower physical blunt durability than Superman. I would say him and Thor is about tied in that aspect. His body is more softer and can't resist hard attacks (attacks from hardened materials) as well some others.

Instead you see a few scans here or there and without reading an actual story get a false idea on how these characters are consistently portrayed all the while cruising respect threads without ever knowing the context behind anything because you don;'t read comics.

Originally posted by quanchi112
But you don't read comics and most of your points are just thought out scenarios in your head. You also claimed Thor is more durable than Odin and don't even possess a basic knowledge of any of these characters or have a clue in the slightest in how they are portrayed.

Instead you see a few scans here or there and without reading an actual story get a false idea on how these characters are consistently portrayed all the while cruising respect threads without ever knowing the context behind anything because you don;'t read comics.

Well I tell you this. I have read over 50 Thor comics (I physically have more than 20 paper versions), and many others. Of course I don't read every comic (who does?). That is why we have scans and respect threads. They are there for a reason.

From everything I read on Thanos he never seemed 100% bulletproof.
That means until the Thanos Imperative I believed that Thanos could be penetrated by high calibur bullets (like from military fighter jets).
Even after I accepted that he is bulletproof but barely. Now against wider attacks (like fists) his durability goes up, almost like WW and Thor.

So thanos still wins with ease... good.

Originally posted by h1a8
Well I tell you this. I have read over 50 Thor comics (I physically have more than 20 paper versions), and many others. Of course I don't read every comic (who does?). That is why we have scans and respect threads. They are there for a reason.

From everything I read on Thanos he never seemed 100% bulletproof.
That means until the Thanos Imperative I believed that Thanos could be penetrated by high calibur bullets (like from military fighter jets).
Even after I accepted that he is bulletproof but barely. Now against wider attacks (like fists) his durability goes up, almost like WW and Thor.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you finally admit you really don't have a good fix on either character and for us to disregard your opinion on the matter. You admit current Thanos is bulletproof so you concede your entire point. Thanos wins. The whole bullet proof thing doesn't even apply to a thread in which it's Thor's hammer vs. Thanos anyways.

I said, "barely bulletproof" which implies there are levels. Superman is bulletproof on the highest level. Hulk is bulletproof on a mid level.
Thanos is bulletproof on a mid level.

It does apply to this thread because one's bulletproof level is an indication of how much blunt force they can take. But it doesn't go the other way around.

wow to this thread and some of the arguments here

Originally posted by h1a8
I believe I know the characters fairly well to debate. After all, the scans show the feats. Everything else is just talk and plot.

I said, "barely bulletproof" which implies there are levels. Superman is bulletproof on the highest level. Hulk is bulletproof on a mid level.
Thanos is bulletproof on a mid level.

It does apply to this thread because one's bulletproof level is an indication of how much blunt force they can take. But it doesn't go the other way around.

Originally posted by quanchi112
How is Thanos bulletproof on a mid level ? You need to cite evidence to at least explain your rankings here you just don't debate by citing opinions alone. You new here ?

I gotta stop clicking h1's posts...

Originally posted by h1a8
Bulletproof on a high level suggests that the most powerful bullets (from aircraft mostly) bounce off (ricochet) at full speed. But if the bullets hits and slightly dents in the person's chest while merely falling to the ground afterwards (not ricocheting at full speed) then the person is barely bulletproof (on a mid-level if they can withstand the strongest bullets in this way).

Originally posted by h1a8
Bulletproof on a high level suggests that the most powerful bullets (from aircraft mostly) bounce off (ricochet) at full speed. But if the bullets hits and slightly dents in the person's chest while merely falling to the ground afterwards (not ricocheting at full speed) then the person is barely bulletproof (on a mid-level if they can withstand the strongest bullets in this way).

I was under the impression that you are either bulletproof or your not I didn't know they were levels.You learn something everyday.

Originally posted by SuperiorTech
I was under the impression that you are either bulletproof or your not I didn't know they were levels.You learn something everyday.

Originally posted by SuperiorTech
I was under the impression that you are either bulletproof or your not I didn't know they were levels.You learn something everyday.

Originally posted by h1a8
Kevlar is bulletproof but on a low level as high caliber bullets can still penetrate. Tank armor is bulletproof but on a higher level (almost mid level). So yes there are levels of bulletproof.

I never thought there would be a day I would agree with anything hia8 said... But I get his point...

Luke cage has bulletproof armor level skin But I'm willing to bet a bullet fired at the speed of light would still pierce him...

Comments are relative...

It's like wolverine stating es the best there is at what he does... When all he does is simply suck... 😖hifty:

Originally posted by h1a8
Bulletproof on a high level suggests that the most powerful bullets (from aircraft mostly) bounce off (ricochet) at full speed. But if the bullets hits and slightly dents in the person's chest while merely falling to the ground afterwards (not ricocheting at full speed) then the person is barely bulletproof (on a mid-level if they can withstand the strongest bullets in this way).

That' didn't make any sense at all.

Originally posted by h1a8
Kevlar is bulletproof but on a low level as high caliber bullets can still penetrate. Tank armor is bulletproof but on a higher level (almost mid level). So yes there are levels of bulletproof.

What's the point of contention? That there are different levels of artillery resistance? That's obvious. Certain characters can only withstand small caliber weapons while others can withstand everything up to tank shells. Hell, Thor had it backwards. The higher the caliber, the higher his resistance back in the day. He would strap on a Nuke in one issue and flee from bullets in the next.