What kind of retard logic are you people using in here? Of course Iron Man kills the shit out of the Destroyer. What's the Destroyer going to do to a man who can fire on the move with perfect accuracy from 500 feet in the air and moving at 300 miles per hour? Nothing. What's the Destroyer going to do when it gets hit with a barrage of missiles that 1-shotted a tank? Die.
I don't think I have ever seen people in this forum go balls deep on characters from a movie this fast. From people going "omg Thor blew up a city!" in the vs. Hulk thread to this. Geeze.
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
What kind of retard logic are you people using in here? Of course Iron Man kills the shit out of the Destroyer. What's the Destroyer going to do to a man who can fire on the move with perfect accuracy from 500 feet in the air and moving at 300 miles per hour? Nothing. What's the Destroyer going to do when it gets hit with a barrage of missiles that 1-shotted a tank? Die.I don't think I have ever seen people in this forum go balls deep on characters from a movie this fast. From people going "omg Thor blew up a city!" in the vs. Hulk thread to this. Geeze.
So your saying Stark techology beats the shit out of a suit of armor that was made by a bunch of people from another realm
yeah keep on thinking that 😬
Originally posted by McNasty996
I don't believe that the Destroyers blast was a desintergration beam, more like a cyclops beam of concussive force based on how it reacted with what it hit. And if the Iron Man armor didn't have inertial dampeners Stark would have been turned to mush while he was being kicked around by the Monger and when he fell back onto the roof.
Everybody just ignored this surprisingly.
Originally posted by McNasty996
I don't believe that the Destroyers blast was a desintergration beam, more like a cyclops beam of concussive force based on how it reacted with what it hit. And if the Iron Man armor didn't have inertial dampeners Stark would have been turned to mush while he was being kicked around by the Monger and when he fell back onto the roof.
-I've seen Batman fall out of a building and land on a car with sore back.
Tony's durability feats were because of the armor pure and simple. Not once has he displayed having inertial dampeners. Or any kind of force field. He better have em in the Avengers movie.
-The Destroyer's beam disintergrated the Frost Giants in the beginning didnt it?
His beam carving up the street the way it did was because it's such a monstrous blast that it creates devastating force.
It's Odin's death machine. It's designed to take on beings far vaster than a third generation Ironman.
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
What kind of retard logic are you people using in here? Of course Iron Man kills the shit out of the Destroyer. What's the Destroyer going to do to a man who can fire on the move with perfect accuracy from 500 feet in the air and moving at 300 miles per hour? Nothing. What's the Destroyer going to do when it gets hit with a barrage of missiles that 1-shotted a tank? Die.I don't think I have ever seen people in this forum go balls deep on characters from a movie this fast. From people going "omg Thor blew up a city!" in the vs. Hulk thread to this. Geeze.
Missiles and lasers won't do crap to the Destoyer.
Thor took the armor down by using Mjolnir to absorb and redirect his beam back into its open visor.
Causing an overload and an explosion that shook the sky. Ironman can't do that.
Originally posted by the ninjak
[B]Missiles and lasers won't do crap to the Destoyer.
Causing an overload and an explosion that shook the sky. Ironman can't do that.
That is what destroyed the Destroyer. Assuming that that is what it would take to destroy the Destroyer, is illogical.
For all you or I know, an explosion half that size could have destroyed it.
Your argument is the equivalent of saying that because I killed a cat by shooting an RPG at it, you therefore need an RPG sized explosion to kill a cat.
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Proof?That is what destroyed the Destroyer. Assuming that that is what it would take to destroy the Destroyer, is illogical.
For all you or I know, an explosion half that size could have destroyed it.
Your argument is the equivalent of saying that because I killed a cat by shooting an RPG at it, you therefore need an RPG sized explosion to kill a cat.
Proof. Why don't you prove a repulsor beam will hurt the armor. 😂
The size of the explosion had nothing to do with Koing the Destroyer. Mjolnir absorbed and pushed the energy into the visor. Resulting in the helmut expanding with an overload of its OWN energy. The bands in the armor bent then BOOM.
The explosion I just threw in for shits and giggles. Wonderful cat analogy lol. utterly irrelevant to what I wrote.
Originally posted by Zack Fair
Bring on the pain Blax.For the record the destroyer didn't desintegrate the frost giants in the beginning. You could still see their corpses when Odin and co. walked in.
Tony is getting no respect what so ever.
Pain?
Thanks for the beam feat I thought the Frost giants turned into dust.
I love Ironman but this version is weaksauce No force fields, inertial dampeners. Average strength.
We can argue about missiles hurting the Destroyer armor but get real guys.
So at work today I watched the scene twice where the Frost Giants attempted to steal the artifact from Odin's armory.
The Destroyers beam is a Disintegration beam!
The first giant gets turned to dust so does the second. You don't see what happens to the third.
When Odin enters the room you see a frozen body of one of the Asgardian soldiers and what looks like a melted arm of a Frost Giant.
💃 Bring it on!
Originally posted by the ninjak
[B]Proof. Why don't you prove a repulsor beam will hurt the armor. 😂
Because I understand what burden or proof means and you obviously don't?
The size of the explosion had nothing to do with Koing the Destroyer. Mjolnir absorbed and pushed the energy into the visor. Resulting in the helmut expanding with an overload of its OWN energy. The bands in the armor bent then BOOM.
Why should I care? Are you saying that the Destroyer can only be killed by its own beam? Hitting it with 20 nuclear warheads wouldn't do anything to it? It can survive a planet exploding beneath it? Unless you have some statement from the movie that says the Destroyer can only be killed by its own beam, you are committing a limitless fallacy.
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Because I understand what burden or proof means and you obviously don't?
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Why should I care? Are you saying that the Destroyer can only be killed by its own beam? Hitting it with 20 nuclear warheads wouldn't do anything to it? It can survive a planet exploding beneath it? Unless you have some statement from the movie that says the Destroyer can only be killed by its own beam, you are committing a limitless fallacy.
With it's own beam power + Mjolnirs offensive absorbing power. That's right.
So where was it stated in the movies that the Destroyer can only be killed by its own beam?
Originally posted by the ninjak
but the Destroyer isn't the kind of combatant that will grab Tony by the throat and squeeze while Tony blasts inside his helmut. The Destroyer punches objects out of the way while blasting everything in site with his disintergration beam. So is that proof enough?
How is he going to hit a target that F-16's moving at mach 2 firing missiles and Gatling guns couldn't hit? Last time I checked, the Destroyer can't fly, and it was having trouble hitting people running along the ground at normal speeds.
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
So where was it stated in the movies that the Destroyer can only be killed by its own beam?
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
How is he going to hit a target that F-16's moving at mach 2 firing missiles and Gatling guns couldn't hit? Last time I checked, the Destroyer can't fly, and it was having trouble hitting people running along the ground at normal speeds.
The Destroyer is killing people. Blowing up houses. Tony is a man who will protect innocent people to his dying breath he is an Avenger.
The Destroyer doesn't have to move fast he is a juggernaut. Sooner or later Tony is gonna have to challenge the armor, test its abilities. Once he realises that his artillery has no effect either he unleashes his entire arsenal on it and retreats for reload or advice......... its BFR.
If he tries to get creative and tries to send a Unibeam into its visor, I can't see him getting the placement advantage. As stated above.
TAKE IT AS YOU WILL. THE DESTROYER ARMOR WAS COMPROMISED BY EITHER MJOLNIR OR THE DESTROYERS BEAM OR BOTH. THINGS TONY HAS NEITHER OF.
THOR HAD BOTH.