Originally posted by Kazenji
Then prove us wrong then, Instead of agreeing with people who are moaning and groaning over about things that folks actually think this or that gonna win.
Other people already have. The pro Destroyer argument basically boils down to: "only Thor/Mjolnir can destroy the Destroyer because Thor/Mjolnir destroyed it.' Which is a nonsense argument.
Originally posted by the ninjak
I didn't say that just Mjolnir can do the same feat.Just not Ironman.
Destroyer was taken down by having its own blast turned against it, right? This we all agree on?
Iron Man has attacks that are arguably equal or more powerful than the Destroyer's blast. That mini-rocket that obliterated a tank could likely do it.
Originally posted by Robtard
Destroyer was taken down by having its own blast turned against it, right? This we all agree on?Iron Man has attacks that are arguably equal or more powerful than the Destroyer's blast. That mini-rocket that obliterated a tank could likely do it.
Same as an IonCannon. But as I wrote above.
- Ironman's little missile ain't gonna get through the beam. It'll melt.
- Ironman's IonCannon won't be able to get a good position to get into the visor. If he floats in front of the Destroyer he'll get melted.
And besides from the scene the Destroyer just kept shooting his beam. Thor used Mjolnir to absorb the blast and keep pouring it in. Overloading and compromising the armor.
Arguably just shooting a bomb at the Destroyers head won't do crap. Especially while the visor is down.
And that's ignoring the fact that this ultimate weapon made by Odin himself to fight insane beings could actually be damaged by such things. But there is no proof of that just logical conclusion. Unfortunately we never see Destroyer received damage other than from what many would think was the perfect item to take it down. So it's really a pointless argument.
Originally posted by the ninjak
[B]Same as an IonCannon. But as I wrote above.- Ironman's little missile ain't gonna get through the beam. It'll melt.
The Destroyer can't hit full sized humans moving at regular human speed with its beam, yet it's going to hit a missile the size of your dick fired by a guy who is literally flying at the speed of sound?
Ironman's IonCannon won't be able to get a good position to get into the visor. If he floats in front of the Destroyer he'll get melted.
Even though he can move at the speed of sound?
And besides from the scene the Destroyer just kept shooting his beam. Thor used Mjolnir to absorb the blast and keep pouring it in. Overloading and compromising the armor.
Or this
Argue what you want about it not being destroyed, her spear went through it like a knife through butter, and the only force she put behind the strike was the force of gravity. And yet, while it didn't destroy the Destroyer it did do enough damage to temporarily shut it down. A single beam from one of his hands will tear right through it. From that point it just comes down to unloading on it from 30,000 feet up.
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
The Destroyer can't hit full sized humans moving at regular human speed with its beam, yet it's going to hit a missile the size of your dick fired by a guy who is literally flying at the speed of sound?
Even though he can move at the speed of sound?
Argue what you want about it not being destroyed, her spear went through it like a knife through butter, and the only force she put behind the strike was the force of gravity. And yet, while it didn't destroy the Destroyer it did do enough damage to temporarily shut it down. A single beam from one of his hands will tear right through it. From that point it just comes down to unloading on it from 30,000 feet up.
1.The spear of Asgardian design went through the lines between the metal bands in the armor. You know the metal bands that rotated around. He was toying with her obviously. The Destroyer had a sense of humor. He faked out twice in that battle. Maybe because he was passively being controlled by Loki.
2.When did you see my dick? Perv!
3. He ain't using the Ion Cannon while flying at the speed of sound LO fricken L.
4. The Destroyer was fine when the spear was in him. Using beams as a comparable offense is not a good comparison.
Originally posted by the ninjak
Same as an IonCannon. But as I wrote above.- Ironman's little missile ain't gonna get through the beam. It'll melt.
- Ironman's IonCannon won't be able to get a good position to get into the visor. If he floats in front of the Destroyer he'll get melted.And besides from the scene the Destroyer just kept shooting his beam. Thor used Mjolnir to absorb the blast and keep pouring it in. Overloading and compromising the armor.
Arguably just shooting a bomb at the Destroyers head won't do crap. Especially while the visor is down.
And that's ignoring the fact that this ultimate weapon made by Odin himself to fight insane beings could actually be damaged by such things. But there is no proof of that just logical conclusion. Unfortunately we never see Destroyer received damage other than from what many would think was the perfect item to take it down. So it's really a pointless argument.
Why does it have to get though the beam. IM's not going to fire it at the beam, he's a genius, not a moron. IM is flying, is loads faster and agile. He can fire it from most angles. Same goes for his hand-beams. Tank-killing rocket likely blow it apart.
IM will get melted? WTF? It's a concussive beam from the looks of it. IM's suit withstood a lot of dmg, it's arguable if the Destroyer's blast will take him out.
Cos Thor charged it head-on, the style of fighting he does, little thinking; lots of bashing. Stark is far more mobile and intelligent.
Why won't shooting the head "do crap", what durability feats did the visor show?
Translation: The Destroyer was fairly unimpressive and it doesn't have many screen-feats, so you're arguing that it wins cos you're still high off the Thor fix.
Concession accepted.
Originally posted by Robtard
Concession accepted.
Yawwwn. When did this happen?
And Thor fought the Destroyer far more intelligently then his comic counterpart. He knew his hammer could absorb the beam.
Tony get torn apart in both of his films. 😆 😆
A someone saying that Tony can shoot Repulsors 30,000 ft in away is pretty phucking funny.
I said 2 or 3 posts back that we covered really everything and lack of feats make this a silly forum fight. But if you guys wanna repeat yourselves over and over help yourselves.
Originally posted by the ninjak
Yawwwn. When did this happen?And Thor fought the Destroyer far more intelligently then his comic counterpart. He knew his hammer could absorb the beam.
Tony get torn apart in both of his films. 😆 😆A someone saying that Tony can shoot Repulsors 30,000 ft in away is pretty phucking funny.
I said 2 or 3 posts back that we covered really everything and lack of feats make this a silly forum fight. But if you guys wanna repeat yourselves over and over help yourselves.
Right above when you accepted that the Destroyer in the film wasn't all that.
Not really. In the first film, he was fighting Monger at a very weakened state, he's not weak here. In IM2, when did he get "torn apart", when he was in the briefcase-suit? That's a weaker suit.
Who said "30,000" feet? Don't recall IM having that range. He does have good range though.
Lack of feats means Destroyer is going down, as it wasn't that impressive. You're swinging from its nuts though.
Then this thread is over Destroyer can take destroyed from anything more powerful than a bullet. Nah!
Destroyer faked out the spear attack....obviously.
And the only weapon Tony has shown defying Thor's feat is the Ion Cannon.
Which Tony WILL NOT be able to use on the Destroyer like Thor used Mjolnir.
Thor kept the Destroyer in place in a powerful hurricane. Even aduring the final blast the Destroyer was held in place. Thor had complete control.
Ironman shoots the Destroyer with an Ion Cannon Destroyer falls backwards.
Ironman loses 80% of power and the fight continues. Logic. The hammer fell him. So will an Ion Cannon. 🙂
Originally posted by McNasty996
Did anyone mention that Stark's lasers may be able to cut the Destroyer up in four separate pieces, thus immediately ending the match?
Sif's spear arguably just slid through the bands in the armor. The same bands that rotated his form to face backwards.
Thor's Hammer smacking the armor was blunt force trauma and didn't compromise it. It just knocked it down.
Thor's overloading of the armor was Mjolnir absorbing the constant beam and sending it back into the visor + any power output the hammer could dish out. All while holding the armor perfectly in place with the winds.
So the only thing Ironman has in his arsenal that can do that is the Ion Cannon which would simply Blast the Destroyer along the ground like the hammer did. Tony can't hold the armor in place while he pours in the juice.
The cutting beams are arguably no different than the Ion Cannon. Just more focused.
Makes no difference. Tony's "Super Lasers" failed to cut through the hull of the flying beasts in Avengers.
And his mini bomb won't do anything to the Destroyer.
It was nice seeing what people had to offer in regards to Ironman's feats vs Thor's feats in regards to the Destroyer battle.
Thor comes out on top as he should...and the Destroyer disintegrates Ironman the second he tries to fight in melee combat. Which he will considering his energy weapons wont hurt it.
Or in a straight fist fight Tony gets crushed worse than his armor did against Thor.
Movie Ironman has a long ways to go before he can take down movie Destroyer.