Originally posted by cdtmYou mean a Thor using a amped god blast which isnt his regular thing, anyway Sue storm did virtually the same thing.
I guess Thor destroying Celestial armor means nothing, then? Same logic.
Superboy Prime was vulnerable to punches in a fight, too. Kon El even drew blood!And? Glads is regulary shown to be vulnerable to punches, Prime isnt so you point is meaningless.
Does that mean all his feats don't mean anything?Depends on this situation, here it comes down to hist the hardest/can take the most hits in combat...Glads is the weakest here at both.
Originally posted by Batman-Prime
So Glads can't move at 100 x speed of light during combat? Ok, good 😄.Don't worry, If your naked body isn't on those scans my eyes will handle them . 😉
No, he can't move at those speeds during combat. I never said that he could...*sigh*.
Lol... my necked body? One sign of my 6 pack would make everybody eyes burn out. As for the scans that I AM talking about... Glads destructive power would be to much for this thread.
Originally posted by Nihilist
You mean a Thor using a amped god blast which isnt his regular thing, anyway Sue storm did virtually the same thing.
The God Blast wasn't amped. The Belt of Strength reinforced Mjolnir's fortifications. Sue Storm exploited a flaw. Her powers came from hyperspace, and so on.
If you're going to attempt to clarify a point, make sure you actually know what you're talking about.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusSo the god blast was still aided then and Sue Storm still damaged the Celestial...which is what i said in the first place.
The God Blast wasn't amped. The Belt of Strength reinforced Mjolnir's fortifications. Sue Storm exploited a flaw. Her powers came from hyperspace, and so on.
If you're going to attempt to clarify a point, make sure you actually know what you're talking about.I did, if you wasnt such a moron that starts jumping all over Thor dick anytime someone says something about Thor you may just understnd that.
Originally posted by Nihilist
So the god blast was still aided then and Sue Storm still damaged the Celestial...which is what i said in the first place.
You said that Thor performed, and I quote, "an amped god blast which isnt his regular thing".
A pretty straightforward statement that implies the God Blast was amped. It wasn't. There was no outside interference increasing the raw power of the attack. He however did use the belt of strength to reinforce Mjolnir's fortifications:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/802/thor38820.jpg/
It's an important distinction worth noting.
Yes, Susan Storm did damage the Celestial, but as far as I can tell, you attempted to use that showing to somehow demean what Thor accomplished: "anyway Sue storm did virtually the same thing."
Fortunately, you remain true to self and fail in the attempt. She exploited a weakness. Thor used raw power. Two very different methods of approach.
In short, stop being so full of shit.
Originally posted by Nihilist
I did, if you wasnt such a moron that starts jumping all over Thor dick anytime someone says something about Thor you may just understnd that.
No, you really didn't. Either you knowingly attempted to mislead the poster or are just ignorant. It matters not, as in both scenarios you come off in an unfavorable light.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusSo tell me then Rage does Thor always use the belt of strength to aid the godblast?, no he doesnt so it wasnt his asual godblast. Who gives a shit if Sue storm exploited a weakness, she damaged the celestial,that was my whole point.
You said that Thor performed, and I quote, "an amped god blast which isnt his regular thing".A pretty straightforward statement that implies the God Blast was amped. It wasn't. There was no outside interference increasing the raw power of the attack. He however did use the belt of strength to reinforce Mjolnir's fortifications:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/802/thor38820.jpg/It's an important distinction worth noting.
Yes, Susan Storm did damage the Celestial, but as far as I can tell, you attempted to use that showing to somehow demean what Thor accomplished: "anyway Sue storm did virtually the same thing."
Unfortunately -at least from your stance- you fail in this regard. She exploited a weakness. Thor used raw power. Two very different methods of approach.
In short, stop being so full of shit.
No, you really didn't. Either you knowingly attempted to mislead the poster or are just ignorant. It matters not, as in both scenarios you come off in an unfavorable light.
If anything you come looking like the f*g you are crying over Thors dick the instant Mighty Thors feats arent hyped up, forcing you to jump in a make a massive issue aabout it.
Originally posted by Nihilist
So tell me then Rage does Thor always use the belt of strength to aid the godblast?, no he doesnt so it wasnt his asual godblast.
I thought my post was extremely clear. I don't give a shit whether he went to further extremes than usual, that wasn't the point of the discussion.
Was the God Blast's power amped?
Yes or No?
Originally posted by Nihilist
Who gives a shit if Sue storm exploited a weakness, she damaged the celestial,that was my whole point.
You attempted to demean Thor's feat. Unfortunately, you failed. Sue exploited a never before seen weakness. Thor used raw power. Now that it's clear, I'm done with this branch of the argument.
Originally posted by Nihilist
If anything you come looking like the f*g you are crying over Thors dick the instant Mighty Thors feats arent hyped up, forcing you to jump in a make a massive issue aabout it.
baka
I'm clearly very worked up about this.
Spoiler:
That was sarcasm.
I wouldn't have actually said anything if you weren't so full of it. In particular, I found it amusing that while attempting to clarify something, you twisted shit. Irony always makes me chuckle.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusYes, otherwise he wouldnt of had to reinforce Mjolnir's with the belt of strength to handle the extra power/energy he was getting and has never shown since.
I thought my post was extremely clear. I don't give a shit whether he went to further extremes than usual, that wasn't the point of the discussion.Was the God Blast's power amped?
[b]Yes or No?
You attempted to demean Thor's feat. Unfortunately, you failed. Sue exploited a never before seen weakness. Thor used raw power. Now that it's clear, I'm done with this branch of the argument.If you cant accept Sue did what Thor did, thats not my fault.
bakaThere is nothing to twist, the fact remains the feats arent as great as you make them out to be with the context you clearly ignore with your bias.I'm clearly very worked up about this.
Spoiler:
That was sarcasm.I wouldn't have actually said anything if you weren't so full of it. In particular, I found it amusing that while attempting to clarify something, you twisted shit. Irony always makes me chuckle.
