*sigh* You know, Carver, I'm just trying to help you stop embarrassing yourself all the time. Hulk's abomination punch was nowhere near as impressive. Abomination was substantially less impressive than DS' underling Mantis, and arguably even Kalibak. But you can never admit this because it would go against your premise, which is also your conclusion, that Hulk is the strongest one there is. Everybody else's showings are then read in order to make that basic assumption true. Hulk is stronger than Abomination, and must be stronger than character X, therefore Abomination must be as strong as or stronger than character X. It is not logical, but it is how you think, whether you know it or not. If you look at someone like Quan, you will notice the same pattern, where everything is modified in relation to his axiomatic position on Thanos.
As for superman, Superman and Marvel were destroying building after building in their fight. See also the Doomsday fights, the Mongul fight, etc.
But you know, the truth is that I'm not even really invested in the strength levels. You see, I like the characters because of the characters; for instance, I don't want to see Surfer, one of my favorite characters, suddenly become so powerful that he can just trounce Thanos. It would be cheap and stupid, much like his loss of pacificism. Hulk (at least savage hulk) is a great character -- a true classic. Try to appreciate the character for what he is rather than how powerful you want him to be.