How does evolution explain males and females?

Started by Shakyamunison17 pages
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Evolution is a sad, pathetic lie from the wicked one.

This is just silly.

There is not one shred of proof for evolution.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
There is not one shred of proof for evolution.

You don't even know what evolution is. Explain it to me in your own words and prove me wrong.

There are some animals that have evolved to reproduce sexually AND asexually, to take advantage of what each type has to offer.

Just saying...

Originally posted by Bardock42
There are some animals that have evolved to reproduce sexually AND asexually, to take advantage of what each type has to offer.

Just saying...

Macroevolution has never been observed.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Evolution is impossible, do your research.

What is evolution to you?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
What is evolution to you?

Proof that macroevolution is not possible.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Proof that macroevolution is not possible.

There is no such thing.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
There is no such thing.

No life has ever been synthesized in a laboratory with intelligent, highly-educated scientists--much less in a non-controlled environment through random, chance unintelligence.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
No life has ever been synthesized in a laboratory with intelligent, highly-educated scientists--much less in a non-controlled environment through random, chance unintelligence.

OK, I answered this already. It took hundreds of millions of years for life to come into existence? Why would humans be able to do that in a human life time.

Ignorance in not evidence.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
OK, I answered this already. It took hundreds of millions of years for life to come into existence? Why would humans be able to do that in a human life time.

Ignorance in not evidence.

If it takes so long why are they still trying to do it?

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
If takes so long why are they still trying to do it?

You would have to ask them. I would guess the pursuit of knowledge.

JIA, this was already asked and answered. Stop trolling because the answer doesn't conform to your narrow religious viewpoint.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
There is not one shred of proof for evolution.

but there is for heaven and hell? or have you answered that, somewhere?

Originally posted by -Pr-
but there is for heaven and hell? or have you answered that, somewhere?

The Bible, of course. Definitive proof of anything, so long as it agrees with thousands of year old morality.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
The Bible, of course. Definitive proof of anything, so long as it agrees with thousands of year old morality.

😂

I was afraid that would be the answer.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Macroevolution has never been observed.

Macroevolution and microevolution are not things. There's just evolution, and that has been observed. If you however refer to macroevolution as the point where two ancestors unable to breed with each other, that has been observed.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Macroevolution and microevolution are not things. There's just evolution, and that has been observed. If you however refer to macroevolution as the point where two ancestors unable to breed with each other, that has been observed.

No, macroevolution refers to speciation (which has never been observed).

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
No, macroevolution refers to speciation (which has never been observed).

No, I'm telling you, it has. Two new species, unable to interbreed.

Originally posted by Bardock42
No, I'm telling you, it has. Two new species, unable to interbreed.

You have never observed speciation in your life.

It is not possible.