Originally posted by wildernesss
not zero feats...but a handful is pretty close to zero.
"A handful" against legendary warriors.
As well as generally shown to have the martial arts skills to fight top-tiers with pretty much any weapon and hold her own. Unarmed, staff, spear, whatever.
to wound logan she will have to strike his flesh; that would be dependent upon being a better swordsman, which she is not. even if she strike a mortal blow, he would continue to heal while any wound she sustained would not. she would eventually fall due to sustain damage. basically, she may win scenario 1. she loses scenario 2.
Nope. With her strength, Logan'll be thrown around by her blows, hard. She doesn't need to outfight him with the strength advantage. A nice hit to his ribcage won't do anything mortal thanks to his skeleton, but he'll sure as heck feel the shock and be knocked down.
Don't forget he holds the way to end the fight quickly- once a class 100 strike knocks the sword from his hand, she can use it too.
she was winning but didn't win; and she did "fine" against claw. why don't those two feats impress me when stacked against decades of logan's feats with a sword?
Because you're oddly focused on the weird idea that Logan stands a chance against her?
If you hold the advantage against two legendary figures, the fact that you don't have the quantity of feats doesn't change that the feats she does have portray her as someone very much able to match swords against Logan.